Back to @ChaseDaniel's profile

Chase Daniel engagement report

@ChaseDaniel - 182K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.181%
of 182K followers
Per impression
1.22%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
14.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
328
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.5/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 328 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.181%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 35x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #miz, #mnf.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #miz, #mnf.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chase Daniel's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.181%, Chase Daniel sits above the 50th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.67%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,465 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202635x their median

    Who is the 24-team CFP for? https://t.co/5crnwAGdvv

    10K966251131851K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202616x their median

    I’m telling you right now…only certain people in the world can make this throw. Caleb Williams & Bears are so much further along than last year already https://t.co/Wion6k9N4T

    4.9K3178231457K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202614x their median

    Jacoby Brissett is outplaying Justin Herbert & it’s not really close right now. What’s happening in LA?

    4.2K10225437173K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202611x their median

    It’s time for Caleb Williams to come back

    3.5K17778969K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20269.7x their median

    🚨JP POLL: Week 7 Edition🚨 Teams listed in order of neutral-field favorably. Not a ranking. https://t.co/u3u4jEPkYk

    2.3K5770690518K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20268.4x their median

    Updating my midseason rankings for the 2027 NFL Draft. Drew Mestemaker is QB1 🏈 https://t.co/7irbQj7N4R

    2.4K20079112334K viewsView on X
  • Mar 16, 20263.3x their median

    "It's going to be completely revamped offense. ... I think this offense is going to be specifically designed around Jaxson Dart's strengths." —@ChaseDaniel on the Giants' offense after their additions in free agency 👀 https://t.co/hrEpYI3l9F

    1.7K1493711417K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.1x their median

    Who would’ve thought Patrick Mahomes could have less than 70 yards passing and the Chiefs would STILL be up 14 on one of the best defenses in football?! Kenneth Walker is the REAL DEAL. 👀

    1.3K4223591K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.9x their median

    Josh Allen is the best player in the game right now & it’s not even close…5 total TD’s https://t.co/LgpjuMXPXm

    1.1K691531561K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.8x their median

    This dude never misses…@CoachDrinkwitz https://t.co/V4ZxhwGsde

    879208149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#miz#mnf

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 328 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.181%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 35x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #miz, #mnf.

What is Chase Daniel's engagement rate on X?
Chase Daniel (@ChaseDaniel) has an engagement rate of 0.181%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 182,029 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.181%, Chase Daniel sits above the 50th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChaseDaniel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChaseDaniel post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going