Charles Leclerc engagement report
@Charles_Leclerc - 4.2M followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 29K interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.697%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 321K times each, and 9.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 260K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #apmmonaco.
Compared with accounts its own size
Charles Leclerc's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.697%, Charles Leclerc sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 2, 202612x their median
28/02/2026 - Civil Wedding 🤍 https://t.co/mCXtmHlCVY
- Mar 2, 20269.7x their median
A day we’ll forever remember. 🤍 Part one is done and part 2 will be next year with all of our close ones. https://t.co/kVZqmo3OdN
- Jul 5, 20266.9x their median
Tough time never lasttttttttt, only tough people lasttttttttt 😘 BOLOBOLOBKBKNGHCD https://t.co/M44uVUpEwI
- Jul 13, 20263.5x their median
All the pictures were taken by Alexandra, but I took the last one 🧚 https://t.co/8ptYDg94sz
- Jun 3, 20263.4x their median
Here to stay ❤️ @ScuderiaFerrari https://t.co/kOkveV33wp
- Oct 11, 20262.2x their median
Good points this weekend. Wasn’t quite enough today, but we’ll try again in two weeks in Austin. Thank you very much for the big support here in Singapore ❤️ https://t.co/ZJPHWuitf9
- Oct 19, 20262.1x their median
beautiful birthday in tuscany and the first practice with the stroller went well 🤍 https://t.co/ncIgF5wfPZ
- Mar 29, 20262.1x their median
Another podium here in Japan. Pushed to the very max until the end. Now time to go back to Maranello and use the break to develop as much as possible the car. Happy to see Ollie okay after the nasty crash. https://t.co/1qeGuLUHzo
- Jul 19, 20262.1x their median
P2 🙂 Happy to be on the podium, got a bit lucky with the VSC that helped us to get in contention for the win but Kimi was just too quick, next stop: Budapest😘 https://t.co/NUT6OSjiR0
- Sep 8, 20262.0x their median
Not how I wanted the weekend to go. Thanks for all the messages. Physically, that was a big one but I’m okay. Emotionally, it hurts even more for something like this to happen here at home, in front of all of you, the tifosi. Thank you for the incredible welcome and support all weekend. Monza with you is always something so special. ❤️
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 29K interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.697%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 321K times each, and 9.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 260K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
- What is Charles Leclerc's engagement rate on X?
- Charles Leclerc (@Charles_Leclerc) has an engagement rate of 0.697%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,191,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.697%, Charles Leclerc sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Charles_Leclerc have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Charles_Leclerc post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.