Back to @Chain_GPT's profile

ChainGPT engagement report

@Chain_GPT - 787K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 787K followers
Per impression
0.844%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
4.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
308
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 787K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.844% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ChainGPT's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, ChainGPT sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Dec 16, 202511x their median

    Introducing AI Hub V2, the Intelligence Engine powering the next era of Web3. Designed to help you research like an analyst, trade like a pro, and understand the market like never before. Let’s dive in ā¤µļø https://t.co/6IlSUt4J16

    1.1K1.7K45864258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.5x their median

    ChainGPT is now ranked #1 in the AI category on CertiK's Skynet leaderboard. Skynet Score 93.30, AAA rated. CertiK's audit came back with zero findings at every severity, and 81,000+ user ratings average 9.16. Security scores are the one leaderboard in AI x crypto you can't market your way onto. Glad it's the one we top. https://t.co/Ii37tQyk8D

    25241177238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    "Registered with the SEC" is on the banner, and it can mean four different things. Broker-dealer registration covers the firm handling your order. Investment adviser registration is about who manages the money, and transfer agent registration is about who keeps the ownership records. Those three describe a company. A securities offering registration is the one that says something about the token or share you are actually buying. ChainGPT's Crypto Compliance Assistant is an AI that reads a claim like that and tells you which registration it refers to, with sources across 100+ jurisdictions. → https://t.co/kFImSJakco

    24632164033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    The audit badge in the bio covered the code as it stood last spring. The contract has been upgraded twice since. Every audit report opens with a scope section that names the exact contracts, the version and the date. Anything deployed after that date is unaudited code wearing the badge. Run the current code through ChainGPT's Smart Contract Auditor for a scored vulnerability report. → https://t.co/56qupSAJ3E

    19535195133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    bullish gm ā˜€ļø

    26332125048K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Plenty of launchpads hand out token slots to whoever refreshes fastest, so the sale becomes a click race. @ChainGPT_Pad decides how much of a new token you can buy based on how much $CGPT you have locked up, and you can see your number before the sale page even opens. You show up already knowing your size, before any refreshing starts.

    24431124037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    Claude can spend from a wallet it cannot drain. In our Developer Kit for Claude Code, anything that moves funds comes back as an unsigned transaction and you sign it yourself. The agent's own wallet is capped by a policy file the model has no tool to rewrite, so it can't raise its own limit. Parental controls, for the thing holding the card. → Install the plugin: https://t.co/h7WXDfqVks

    17326192050K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    An AI model's knowledge froze the day its training ended. Your wallet balance changed this morning. That gap is why plain chatbots invent on-chain numbers - they can't look anything up. Tools fix it: functions the model calls to fetch live data. The ChainGPT Developer Kit gives Claude Code 154 of them, and the on-chain tools need no API key. → https://t.co/5IS6lnWrsw

    21222155033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Gas is a code review you pay for forever. A wasteful storage slot bills every user on every call, and the cheapest moment to change it is before the contract exists. ChainGPT's Smart Contract Generator turns a written spec into Solidity, 3 free runs a day. Tighten the spec, generate again, read both files while neither one is on-chain yet. If you've ever shipped a contract and spotted the waste a week later, you know which read matters. → https://t.co/CoCSpJUGMR

    23231118023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Privacy is the next fight in AI, and we've picked our side. We've always built on three Web3 principles: free access to knowledge, decentralization, and privacy. What we're launching next comes straight from that. Turn notifications on for @Chain_GPT šŸ”” Untold, launching soon.

    208401303645K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 787K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.844% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is ChainGPT's engagement rate on X?
ChainGPT (@Chain_GPT) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 786,612 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, ChainGPT sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chain_GPT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chain_GPT post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going