Back to @ChainGPT_Pad's profile

ChainGPT Pad engagement report

@ChainGPT_Pad - 466K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.037%
of 466K followers
Per impression
1.06%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
175
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 175 interactions against 466K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ChainGPT Pad's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, ChainGPT Pad sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link46% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 46% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 202617x their median

    INTERSTELLAR IS NOW LIVE. The only way to enter the DAC Mainnet is with your Launch Code. If you have one, head to: https://t.co/zuuezllHGW Your first steps inside โ†“ https://t.co/776f11LoXV

    1.3K2811.1K35988K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.8x their median

    Join our AMA with @davide___costa and Artur from @dac_chain to unpack the quantum threat facing Web3, and what it takes to build a chain that is ready for it. Plus, what DAC is bringing to market ahead of its Buzzdrop on ChainGPT Pad. ๐Ÿ—“ Wednesday, September 2 ๐Ÿ•1:00pm UTC ๐Ÿ“Œ https://t.co/OMrRyFZOX0

    6341731762839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.3x their median

    The @dac_chain Buzzdrop is live on ChainGPT Pad. $DACT has allocated $100,000 in rewards for Buzzers. Complete quests, share your Buzz Links, drive real outcomes, climb the leaderboard. Join here ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/gUQmWzgXKZ https://t.co/clkyKTA7HW

    5539921257117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.5x their median

    10,000+ people are already splitting the $100,000 $DACT pool in the @dac_chain Buzzdrop. The pool didn't get bigger. โ†’ Reward pool: $100,000 in $DACT โ†’ Ends: September 14, 12 PM UTC โ†’ Network: Ethereum โ†’ Vesting: 25% at TGE, 3 months Rank decides your cut of the pot. Start Buzzing ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/zxIp3xwT9I

    349661741625K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.2x their median

    $100,000 in $DACT sits in one fixed pool, with 5,000+ people already climbing the board. The @dac_chain Buzzdrop runs on ChainGPT Pad until September 14, 12 PM UTC. You earn points for social tasks, and where you land on the leaderboard sets how much of that $100,000 you take home. Every new climber pushes the ranks around, so the board keeps moving until the clock runs out. DAC is an EVM L1 building for the day quantum breaks everyone else's crypto, with DWF Labs and Da Vinci on market making. Start Buzzing ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/zxIp3xxqZg

    34348162426K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.1x their median

    DAC Public Sale is coming to ChainGPT Pad. @dac_chain is an EVM-compatible L1 that treats quantum computing as a security problem for today, not a patch for later. 10.3M testnet wallets and counting, and a ChainGPT Labs Residency graduate. Dates and sale page drop shortly. Get your KYC done ๐Ÿ‘€

    329431561780K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.7x their median

    8,700+ Buzzers have joined the @dac_chain Buzzdrop. If you haven't yet: register, grab your Buzz Links, share them where your audience already is. Rewards follow qualified clicks and verified conversions, not follower count. There is still time before the September 14 snapshot. Start Buzzing ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/zxIp3xwT9I

    238351802811K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.7x their median

    1 week left on the @pheasantnetwork Buzzdrop. 8,500+ Buzzers are already in for the $200,000 in $PNT. โ†’ Network: Ethereum โ†’ Vesting: 20% at TGE, 8 months โ†’ Ends on September 13, 12PM UTC. The pool is fixed and rank decides your slice, so there's still runway to climb. Start Buzzing ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/115eOt9dH5

    234391841819K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.6x their median

    1,250+ Buzzers are in the @dac_chain Buzzdrop on ChainGPT Pad. $100,000 in $DACT is live until September 14, 12 PM UTC. DAC is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 built for quantum security, with DWF Labs and Da Vinci on market making. Rank decides your slice, so grab your Buzz Links early. Start Buzzing ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/zxIp3xxqZg

    26345148725K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.6x their median

    The $DACT Public Sale is coming to ChainGPT Pad. @dac_chain is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 built on one premise: quantum computing is a security requirement for today, not a patch for later. Quantum entropy sits in the network architecture, with Proof of Quantum Work in development at the protocol level. The dual-token economy separates ecosystem value from network cost. $DACT governs access, participation and node activation. DACC powers transactions, keeping network fees predictable as the ecosystem grows. 10.3M testnet wallets. Interstellar Mainnet deployed. A ChainGPT Labs Residency graduate. Terms below ๐Ÿงต

    254351521159K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 175 interactions against 466K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is ChainGPT Pad's engagement rate on X?
ChainGPT Pad (@ChainGPT_Pad) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 466,242 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, ChainGPT Pad sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChainGPT_Pad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChainGPT_Pad post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going