CertiK engagement report
@CertiK - 558K followers on X
Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.612% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 756 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #certikinsight, #kbw2026, #certikinsights.
Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tags: #certikinsight, #kbw2026, #certikinsights.
Compared with accounts its own size
CertiK's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.01%, CertiK sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 81% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 31% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 301 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 8, 202614x their median
🎙️ Cregis MicUp Vol. 19: Risk & Control in Digital Asset Operations 🗓️ September 9, 2026 | 5:00 PM GMT+8 | Live X Space 🔗 Set your reminder: https://t.co/pEO4I0DYu1 Digital asset security remains a serious operational challenge. In the first half of 2026 alone, CertiK recorded more than $1.31 billion in losses across the industry. Behind these incidents is a broader question for enterprises: where can risk enter the process of managing and moving digital assets, and how can it be identified before it results in a loss? Risk may originate within the technology, emerge through on-chain interactions or develop from the way people and systems handle transactions. AI introduces further uncertainty as it becomes more widely used across enterprise operations and takes on a greater role in analyzing information, supporting decisions and interacting with financial systems. Join Cregis for a practical discussion on what recent incidents reveal about enterprise risk, how potential threats can be identified across digital asset operations, and how security controls should evolve as AI becomes more deeply involved. 🎤 Meet Our Expert Panel: Jonathan Riss, OSINT & Blockchain Intelligence Analyst @CertiK Tony Tan, Hong Kong Community Lead @SlowMist_Team 🎙️ Moderated by Bovey Li, Deputy Marketing Director at Cregis 📋 What We’ll Explore: 🔸 Analysis of Representative Security Incidents A closer look at notable incidents, how the attacks unfolded, where the risks entered and what enterprises can learn from the controls that failed or limited the impact. 🔸 Identifying Risk Across Digital Asset Operations How can enterprises identify vulnerabilities and warning signs across their technology, on-chain activities and operating processes before they develop into security incidents? 🔸 Structuring Security for Real Operations How should code audits, infrastructure security, wallet controls, approval policies, monitoring and incident response work together in daily operations? 🔸 How AI Changes Enterprise Security Risk As enterprises use AI across more systems and workflows, where could new risks emerge around information, permissions, decisions and transaction execution? How do these risks differ from traditional security threats, and what strategies can enterprises adopt in response? Why This Matters: For anyone responsible for managing digital assets, security cannot be assessed through code audits or wallet protection alone. Losses can result from weaknesses across connected systems, transaction decisions and everyday operating processes, even when individual components appear secure. This session will help businesses understand how incidents develop across the full flow of digital asset operations, identify gaps in their existing controls, and consider how security responsibilities should evolve as AI gains greater access to enterprise systems and financial activities. 📌 Join us 5 minutes early to secure your spot! #DigitalAssetSecurity #BlockchainSecurity #EnterpriseSecurity #CryptoSecurity #RiskManagement #AIAgents #CertiK #SlowMist #CregisMicUp
- Aug 20, 202613x their median
CertiK 🤝 @MidnightNtwrk We’re excited to announce a new ecosystem partnership with Midnight, a blockchain designed to enable data protection and privacy-preserving applications. Together, we’ll explore opportunities to support the security and continued growth of the Midnight ecosystem as it expands. We look forward to working alongside the Midnight team and contributing to a more secure Web3.
- Sep 15, 202611x their median
Onchain security is everyone’s problem and nobody’s job. ETHSecurity Initiatives is how we are changing that. Propose the work. Fund the work. Build the work. https://t.co/3uj1FmFLNb https://t.co/ZRcX6nrRWW
- Aug 30, 20266.2x their median
We are aware of an incident affecting Tectonic and our team is actively investigating. As a precaution, please do not interact with the protocol until we confirm it is safe to do so. We will post a verified update here as soon as we have one.
- Oct 2, 20264.2x their median
.@Lighter_xyz has surpassed $1.7T in trading volume. Behind that growth, security remains essential. We’ve worked closely with their team to help strengthen their proving infrastructure, and it’s been a pleasure collaborating with people who share our commitment to security. https://t.co/Y5yZm8IViB
- Jul 30, 20263.7x their median
Security doesn't end with an audit. We're excited to join @txEcosystem as a validator, expanding our commitment from securing smart contracts to helping secure the network itself. By operating a validator, we're proud to support the resilience, reliability, and long-term security of the tx ecosystem. Looking forward to contributing to the next chapter of tx.
- Sep 15, 20263.4x their median
Finding vulnerabilities pays. Literally. 💰 Congratulations to @desm_de_crypto on earning a $30,000 bug bounty payout for helping uncover vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. Good finds deserve meaningful rewards. https://t.co/L2ufVpdKPP
- Aug 3, 20263.2x their median
The @DepoCoin bug bounty program is now live on CertiK Hunt! CoinDepo is a digital asset platform offering interest-bearing accounts and crypto-backed loans. Invited researchers can start submitting reports today. Rewards up to $20,000 USD. Programs and researcher invites continue to roll out over the coming weeks. Check out the program: https://t.co/FoXVknNOrj
- Aug 18, 20263.1x their median
🇧🇷 Brazil’s digital asset market is entering a new regulatory era. At @blockchain_rio, CertiK CBO Jason Jiang joined Nagel Lisânias Paulino, Head of Division at the Central Bank of Brazil, for a fireside chat moderated by Marcos Rocha, Partner at Veirano Advogados and Vice Chairman of ABTOKEN. The discussion explored Brazil’s evolving VASP framework, the role of security and compliance, and why both are critical to institutional adoption. Watch the recap 👇
- Aug 10, 20263.0x their median
🇧🇷 Brazil's crypto market is entering a new era. With the October 30, 2026 authorization deadline approaching, VASPs face a fundamental shift: compliance is no longer about promises—it's about proving security, governance, and operational readiness. Our latest Intel3D report explores: • Brazil's new PSAV framework • The rise of independent assurance • What the new rules mean for VASPs and institutions Read the full report👇 https://t.co/j8y7XVlkC6
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.612% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 756 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #certikinsight, #kbw2026, #certikinsights.
- What is CertiK's engagement rate on X?
- CertiK (@CertiK) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 558,271 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.01%, CertiK sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CertiK have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CertiK post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.