Back to @Cerra__'s profile

π˜Ύπ™šπ™§π™§π™– engagement report

@Cerra__ - 169K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.024%
of 169K followers
Per impression
1.66%
2.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
41
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 85x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

π˜Ύπ™šπ™§π™§π™–'s engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.024%, π˜Ύπ™šπ™§π™§π™– sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video32% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 109 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 7, 202485x their median

    Will the US ever elect a woman as President?!

    1.0K643.1K169469K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202681x their median

    People that do this will do awful work and also ask for promotions all the time. Just the worst kind of employee you should definitely avoid. https://t.co/BnkDpXX5h0

    2.7K5254547998K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202617x their median

    Last week I launched the first autonomous CEO Grok Bot It's made me $1,800 so far, and hundreds of others their first online dollar I get texts/DMs like the one below literally every hour telling me the bot template I launched made people money If you haven't set up your autonomous business yet, you NEED to be doing this It's the most fun/satisfying project you'll start this week All you need to do is install the Grok Bot template I created, answer a few questions, and the Bot starts the business If you haven't yet, click the link below If you have already, link your autonomous business in the replies below so I can support it! https://t.co/9bceSJsOjP

    545301031377K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202615x their median

    I'm not an Apple simp but this phone looks too good. Who is getting the new iPhone duo https://t.co/LImzZ3Uf9e

    346142301622K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202615x their median

    50 well-funded tech startups hiring content roles: https://t.co/X3qjrA5zXE

    498363428142K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202611x their median

    Say hello and I'll say it back! https://t.co/61ktOh9Jg6

    318311424.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.6x their median

    Scientists accidentally were able to scan a brain during the moments leading up to death and for a few seconds after and found our life will really flash before our eyes and that seems oddly comforting to me. Like I'll see your face before I die. I kind of like knowing that.

    304172927.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20268.5x their median

    wish you were here πŸ–€

    29984027.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20266.8x their median

    you just got blocked by someone you’ve never interacted with… keep up the good work πŸ–€

    24982214.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20265.8x their median

    monday could’ve been an email πŸ–€

    20672426.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 85x its own typical post.

What is π˜Ύπ™šπ™§π™§π™–'s engagement rate on X?
π˜Ύπ™šπ™§π™§π™– (@Cerra__) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,016 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.024%, π˜Ύπ™šπ™§π™§π™– sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cerra__ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cerra__ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going