Back to @Cecilia97N's profile

Cecile engagement report

@Cecilia97N - 71K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 71K followers
Per impression
1.82%
1.9K views on a typical post
Reach
2.73%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
35
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 126x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cecile's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Cecile sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 105 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026126x their median

    And I don't want to hear of court cases. I want to hear of a Coronation date.

    3.2K42968870258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202665x their median

    Gadaffi renovated it for the kingdom or for the queen mother!? https://t.co/AEkBIdPESM

    2.0K11812916111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202646x their median

    These two will go down in history as the most reliable friends this generation has ever witnessed; standing by a friend both in life and after death is truly rare today.πŸ₯Ί https://t.co/cm815vvYsW

    1.4K10367515K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202631x their median

    Bunyoro-Kitara Kingdom Chief Prince Fred Mugenyi Ruchunya has revealed that His Royal Majesty Dr. Rukirabasaija Agutamba Iguru Solomon Gafabusa is currently in poor health. Details: https://t.co/W4bZgkAHbf https://t.co/TJqsRIAjMD

    1.0K4111227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202622x their median

    Man of the day!! Thank you Omusuuga for standing with African culture. Your ancestors must be very proud of you. https://t.co/g1rWB85lJ7

    6687029211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202616x their median

    Ku Ground bilalamu. Abantu bona basiimye the new King of Tooro!! You may continue ranting!! https://t.co/iT4XDxoQ7f

    474355216.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202615x their median

    My King and our Luo Bebe will look so lovely on the Crowning day. The Luo Babiito dynasty is about to return 😘😘 https://t.co/5HtRuQMp3t

    4771830225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.8x their median

    Fro the time he was announced King, I knew that that it was his calling. Long live King Kijanangoma.πŸ™πŸ½ https://t.co/GxtoIwrezV

    178716224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.8x their median

    The Omusuuga’s sons realized that none of them can be next in line to be King as long as their father is alive and decided to go against him in favor of what would bring them more bread on the table πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚. Its a bread war!! Nobody even cares who is the next KingπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    1208413.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.1x their median

    The other guys should also be like packing their stuff to leave the palace. The Bread eating line has changed!!

    8971214.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 126x its own typical post.

What is Cecile's engagement rate on X?
Cecile (@Cecilia97N) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 70,712 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Cecile sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cecilia97N have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cecilia97N post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going