Back to @Cc_ETHH's profile

Cc酱 engagement report

@Cc_ETHH - 207K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 207K followers
Per impression
0.277%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
9.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
52
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.277% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 154 interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cc酱's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Cc酱 sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 275 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 20263.0x their median

    U卡最近gg不少,但也会出现好用的,最近Gatecard看不少人安利。 所以也是申请 Gate Card,能直接绑 Apple Pay 和 Google Pay。 消费不用先换法币,账户里的 USDT、BTC、ETH、GT、GUSD、USDC 直接扣,六种支付随便选。最高能拿 8% 返现,按卡片等级走,先发积分,自己选兑成 USDT 或者 GT 都行。 虚拟卡申请也简单,一般 3-5 分钟就审核通过,开完就能用。流程大概是:打开申请页选卡 → 完成二级实名传资料 → 等审核 → 激活直接刷。(看我图片申请,懂得都懂easy) 有两点提前说清楚: 一是卡片充值进去会有一定手续费,同时也支持提现回交易帐户。 二是返现是积分制,不会自动变成币躺账户,得自己去兑一下。 U卡凉了就凉了,换这个至少能把刚需续上。 需要办的戳这里: https://t.co/kat5aXsWIr​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​r

    370117015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.4x their median

    🌕过去十年,英伟达 跑出了难以置信的行情 这张13类资产回报对比看得很直观,+14572% 的累计回报,甩开比特币、AMD、一众科技巨头,大幅跑赢标普500、黄金。 AI浪潮到来之前,很少有人预判到这颗GPU芯片会成长为时代的核心资产。 时代红利叠加企业产品硬实力,造就了这一轮史诗级上涨。 但回看历史收益只代表过去,十倍百倍的涨幅已经写在后视镜里。 未来能不能继续复制十年神话,依旧充满变数。 敬畏市场,不要拿过去的收益率推演未来。

    170108019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.4x their median

    不少从加密市场转入美股的交易者,忽视了交易时长演变背后的趋势。 美股持续拓宽交易窗口,迈向全天候交易是长期方向: 🔹1985年:仅常规时段交易,无盘前盘后 🔹1991年:纳斯达克上线盘后交易,争夺跨时区流动性 🔹2000年后:重大消息常在休市时段释放,交易所不断延长交易时间,留住资金 🔹2024年:美股夜盘上线,靠近24小时交易 🔹2026年:不间断交易模式逐步普及 底层逻辑:加密、外汇早已实现7×24小时交易。资金天然追逐更自由的市场,所有交易规则迭代,都是资本投票的结果。

    26097012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.3x their median

    现在能找到高年化还稳的机会真的不多,这次Gate GUSD池好像比单纯冲APR更有性价比。 质押 $GUSD / $USDT / $DOS,直接瓜分 1,410,000 $DOS,DOS池APR高达1891.80%,收益每小时自动到账,不用等。 时间窗口: 8月10日19:00 – 8月24日19:00(UTC+8),现在正进行中,还剩差不多两周。 我个人看法: 高APR看着诱人,但实际收益取决于全网质押量,越晚进可能被稀释得越厉害。 不过这次多了个亮点——质押 $GUSD 还能额外吃到 3.8% 的美债活期收益,而且0费率赎回,相当于一边挖矿一边拿稳定收益,比锁U感觉更赚一点。 想冲的直接去: 👉 https://t.co/plqB96p6c2 详情看官方公告: https://t.co/MM5bq9awVY

    28091011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    以前想玩美股期权,流程特别麻烦,要开户、换汇、境外入金,门槛很高。现在直接在Gate就能操作,纯USDT结算,不用折腾任何境外账户,对币圈玩家太友好了。 而且这次是0平台费、0期权佣金,成本直接拉很低。首期上线的都是NVDA、TSLA、AAPL这些热门科技龙头,都是大家平时最常关注的标的,可玩性非常高 自己实操下来最大的感受: 期权比现货更灵活,既能做风险对冲,也能小资金博取行情收益,非常适合喜欢做短线、抓波段的人。但它属于高阶交易产品,节奏快、波动大,新手一定不要乱重仓 刚好现在上线福利力度很大: 首单交易指定期权可以免费领美股正股、四周持续抽奖瓜分奖金、交易量冲榜还有高额奖励 想体验美股市场、想丰富自己交易体系的,这次真的可以试试 只用一个加密账户,就能打通币圈+美股期权,这种联动玩法真的越来越成熟了 🔗 立即报名:https://t.co/QIT15GroER

    24093023K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20262.3x their median

    黄金震荡磨了这么久,已经到变盘临界点 很快就要走出一波大行情,观望等方向。 https://t.co/j1SQbQWE1B

    33084012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.2x their median

    $Mu 美光 1小时级别,底部完成一轮磨底抬升,现在正在向上试探上方关键压力位909附近。 前面低位区间承接很扎实,低点不断抬高,多头力量在慢慢回归。接下来重点看能否有效突破这道关口,如果站稳,上方空间才能彻底打开。 但也要注意,压力位附近很容易出现反复冲高回落,不要盲目追高,突破确认之后再看持续性。

    13010309.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.2x their median

    黄金这波涨得有多疯,砸下来就有多狠。 前面一路猛拉,好多人看着涨就冲进去做多,结果一根大阴线直接干下来,不少人直接被套在山顶。 看资金指标,大资金已经在跑路,多头现在没劲儿了,MACD也转头往下,空头现在占主导。 之前的支撑位现在变成压力,想再冲回去,难度不小。 我的看法:现在别脑子一热就去抄底。 下跌行情里,抄底很容易接飞刀,以为跌到位了,结果还能继续跌。 现在就盯着下方那道关键支撑,撑得住才有反弹机会;要是撑不住,那还得往下走。

    1419809.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.1x their median

    重要进展:提现时间将不晚于9月26日04:00(UTC)对外公布,感谢各位用户的耐心等待。 根据最新的链上追踪及交易分类结果,约合3.875亿美元的资产已被转移至多个网络上攻击者控制的地址。 此次数据调整反映的是对事件期间转账情况更完整的核算,新增纳入了此前未计入初步估算范围的 Zcash 及 TRON 链上受影响资产,并不代表出现了新的未经授权转账。该事件持续处于受控状态,不会再发生新的未经授权转账。 此次事件涉及以太坊(Ethereum)及多个 EVM 网络、XRP Ledger、Zcash 及 TRON 上的资产。 截至目前已识别的主要攻击者控制的收款地址如下: →EVM:0x770b10b273fc44fe9197d6bf20f145c2e98463ee →XRP:rwNhefsz1UQEusxhCvHip3RANinWi4CTck →ZEC:t1WgMdtND8NF7NDUuYmq8MpMj1NTCXkMDVG →TRON:TBWNguTTgezw9dVorX441C6nDrZpRxYwKD 已确认受影响的资产包括 XRP、ETH、USDT、ZEC、USDC、USDT0、XAUt、BNB、AVAX 及 TRX。 我们的调查与追踪工作仍在持续进行。上述数据反映的是本文发布时已确认的信息,随着更多交易被分类和追踪,相关数据可能会更新。 该事件持续处于受控状态,自事件得到控制以来未再发生新的未经授权转账,与 Mandiant 及慢雾(SlowMist)的联合调查仍在持续进行。 提现功能仍处于暂时暂停状态,我们正在进行进一步的安全核查与修复工作。 Bitget 将持续通过官方渠道,就调查进展、资产追回、提现恢复以及用户保护基金相关事宜发布经核实的最新信息。 以上内容仅供参考。

    57244873K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.1x their median

    币圈用户真实使用率最高的,永远就是币安、OKX、Gate这几家,榜单数据和真实用户习惯完全匹配 几组硬核数据,直观看清底盘实力 • 净资产质量高 Gate当前可查资产约52.6亿美元,剔除平台币后仍有45亿+,真实资产占比高达86%。 不靠平台币虚撑账面,用户本金占主体,资产水分极低。 • 资金回流明显 近7天资金净流入1.12亿美元,单周回流直接超过整月总量,市场回流趋势肉眼可见。 • 现货、合约双活跃 合约持仓突破百亿规模,现货日均成交接近6.8亿。 不是单一业务撑场面,双线流动性都很健康。 • 储备透明可自查 整体储备证明117%,BTC、ETH核心币种储备超120%。 所有数据公开可核验,把资产验证权交给用户,比营销话术更有说服力。 真正的核心:穿越十年周期的存活能力 币圈一年一轮大洗牌,能从2013年活到现在的交易所寥寥无几 经历过ICO狂热、长期熊市、DeFi Summer、2021超级大牛、FTX暴雷行业清盘。 短期数据可以刷,十年周期的存活实力刷不了 如今头部交易所的竞争,早已不是拼手续费、拼交易量,而是拼全生态资产入口能力。 Gate覆盖4800+加密资产,囊括Meme、AI、DePIN、RWA、Pre-IPO全赛道,早期优质资产覆盖面极广,非常适配深耕一级、挖掘新机会的用户 最后客观说句实话 没有绝对零风险的交易所,数据仅作参考 但真正决定平台底盘的,永远是: 资产规模、用户沉淀、流动性深度、储备透明度、长期合规与全球化布局 Gate能稳居华语前四,靠的是所有维度可公开查证的硬实力,而非短期营销造势。 数据来源:https://t.co/1NybJSeEZR

    33177013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.277% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 154 interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.

What is Cc酱's engagement rate on X?
Cc酱 (@Cc_ETHH) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 206,614 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Cc酱 sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cc_ETHH have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cc_ETHH post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going