Back to @CblocHD's profile

Cordelle engagement report

@CblocHD - 190K followers on X

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 190K followers
Per impression
0.168%
894 views on a typical post
Reach
0.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 190K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 894 times each, and 0.168% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.471% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 286 interactions, about 143x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #nowhiring, #upvoteclub.

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #ad, #nowhiring, #upvoteclub.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cordelle's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Cordelle sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link36% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 28, 2024143x their median

    Need promo for your fashion, tech, cryptocurrency, music, link or video? Book me on #Fiverr 📲📧: https://t.co/nRw1LN9ZZ0

    18384181289K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20268.0x their median

    Subscribe to my official Linktree https://t.co/d6oHRpRNKn For exclusive access to my e-books, career services, social media platforms, business resources, promotions, shopping picks, and more. https://t.co/Doc25w0pwA

    1060010K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20265.5x their median

    ☑️ https://t.co/cbtp0nFdMH Subscribe to my official Linktree for exclusive access to my e-books, career services, social media platforms, business resources, promotions, shopping picks, and more. 📚 Learn 💼 Build your career 📈 Grow your brand 💰 Explore income opportunities 📱 Stay connected

    6050387 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20265.0x their median

    Nobody is coming to save you. Get up, get focused, and go get what’s yours.

    72013.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20264.0x their median

    Stay down long enough to build it, then come back up with something nobody can ignore.

    62001.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.5x their median

    The struggle is temporary, but the mindset you build in the trenches will last forever.

    52002.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.5x their median

    Don't give up on your life goals.

    6100988 viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.5x their median

    Built from the struggle, powered by the vision, and paid by the discipline.

    52001.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.0x their median

    Move in silence, build in public, and let the numbers do the talking.

    41101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.0x their median

    They laughed at the meme. Then they laughed at the community. Now they’re watching us from the sidelines. 👀🍿 Doginme isn’t just a token; it’s a full-scale movement. Low cap, zero taxes, and a community that refuses to sleep.🚀 Available to trade on Coinbase. Join the movement before the normies find out: https://t.co/q6z1GRgNr4 CA: 0x6921b130d297cc43754afba22e5eac0fbf8db75b #Memecoin $Doginme #Crypto #Coinbase

    4011464 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad#nowhiring#upvoteclub

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 190K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 894 times each, and 0.168% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.471% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 286 interactions, about 143x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #nowhiring, #upvoteclub.

What is Cordelle's engagement rate on X?
Cordelle (@CblocHD) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 189,725 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Cordelle sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CblocHD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CblocHD post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going