Cathie Wood engagement report
@CathieDWood - 2.9M followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 141 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 194K times each, and 0.073% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 185K interactions, about 1309x its own typical post.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Cathie Wood's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Cathie Wood sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.431% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 51K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 71K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 93K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 96K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 229K |
| Monday | 0% | 284K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 273K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 250K |
| Thursday | -2% | 243K |
| Friday | -3% | 251K |
| Saturday | +3% | 226K |
Best tweets
- Jun 28, 20261309x their median
Happy birthday to my wonderful son. @elonmusk has given me 55 years of joy. It’s so much fun to celebrate with family and friends. His cake is a rocket and a moon base 🎂🎂🎉 https://t.co/IAvuuNhAv7
- Jul 21, 2026188x their median
10M! New day, new usage reset for paid users of Codex and ChatGPT Work. Lands in the next hour. Enjoy. https://t.co/VUJ4S3vKDG
- Jul 16, 2026153x their median
Watch Starship's thirteenth flight test https://t.co/wYoNPiNMz8
- Aug 29, 202672x their median
Tesla Cybercabs have officially gone Unsupervised in Austin, TX! Cybercabs are now driving around the city without anyone in the vehicle. No steering wheel, no pedals. LETS GO! https://t.co/YoG2QiVa8c
- Jul 27, 202640x their median
I used a photo from my Vanityfair Spain editorial and @grok to add movement. @XFashion A reminder that my new book is coming out mid September. Pre-order: TIMELESS- The Art of Reinvention and Resilience at Any Age 📕 https://t.co/ZW0fxaYeMa #ItsGreatToBe78 https://t.co/y4Zmit3moX
- Jun 24, 202638x their median
To conclude that thought, if the US economy continues to pick up momentum—even booms—while inflation slips to 0-1% or below during the next few years, as we believe is likely, Kevin Warsh’s Fed will not stand in the way. The Fed is shifting from fighting growth to encouraging it.
- Jun 8, 202634x their median
You may have heard our research on Tesla Robotaxis... @CathieDWood just rode one through Austin. No driver. No safety monitor. Ride along with Cathie as she shares her thoughts from the passenger seat, including a newly discovered line item for our model. https://t.co/7IfMmDBtOW
- Jul 4, 202618x their median
Gratitude 🇺🇸
- Aug 28, 202613x their median
This week in “data centers raise your bill:” - Georgia Power: Residential savings go from $102/yr to $180/yr by 2029 - PG&E: 4th rate cut in 2 years, down 11% since 2024 - Indiana Michigan asks regulators for a rate reduction All cite data center growth as the reason. https://t.co/DbjPsqlupu
- Jul 8, 202611x their median
Grok 4.5 is looking like a success with help from Cursor data but underneath the surface we expect future Grok/Cursor model training is likely to speed up in the coming months. We've spent several months getting up to speed on the SpaceXAI business, especially the tech underneath it. The C rewrite was under appreciated by the investor community so we dug in to quantify its impact. including building a physics first model that functions as a stopwatch for the SpaceXAI model factory. Bottomline: C-rewrite gets SpaceXAI faster model cycles, leveraging 33% more tokens/second/GPU against SOTA competition resulting in the potential to shipping new models every ~3.5 weeks. two core learnings from this modeling exercise: 1: the training cycle speed up is primarily coming from RL (not pretraining) where the increased tokens/second/GPU advantage can shave up 2+ weeks off full model training cycle. 2: the rewrite itself should compound the time savings as model sizes grow. at ~2T shaving off 2-3 weeks, ~8 weeks at 6T, and 15 weeks at 10T. Note: a 20T parameter model likely runs into a data bottleneck prior to a training speed bottleneck but the directional advantage stands. Also we assume tokens/second/gpu advantage will melt over time as competitors try to match it. when you do the math, in true SpaceX and Elon fashion, it looks like they are attempting to build a SOTA model factory that can pump out bigger models faster than anyone else. Full analysis here for the public: https://t.co/sq3U7Y6X13
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 141 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 194K times each, and 0.073% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 185K interactions, about 1309x its own typical post.
- What is Cathie Wood's engagement rate on X?
- Cathie Wood (@CathieDWood) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,909,628 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Cathie Wood sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CathieDWood have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CathieDWood post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.