Back to @CatalinaLauf's profile

Catalina Lauf engagement report

@CatalinaLauf - 229K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 229K followers
Per impression
1.45%
6.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
92
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.53/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 158K interactions, about 1712x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Catalina Lauf's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Catalina Lauf sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 475 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 9, 20251712x their median

    The President’s wife is an immigrant.
The VP’s wife’s family are immigrants.
My mother is an immigrant.
My husband is an immigrant. We’re not anti-immigrant: we’re anti-ILLEGAL immigration. Yes, you can be Republican and pro-legal immigration. 🇺🇸

    136K17K3.6K6812.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202639x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces $500 refunds will be going out to Americans who were OVER-CHARGED by the disastrous Obamacare law to the tune of $500 million This comes just the morning after 47 pledged a $5K dividend if the GOP wins the midterms Trump is ALL-IN on giving back to the people right now: "Our administration has discovered that under Sleepy Joe Biden, American households buying health insurance through the Obamacare Exchange...were massively overcharged to put it mildly. They were forced to pay excessive fees, soldering at least $500 million." "Our administration is doing the right thing and giving the money back to the people who were wrongly ripped off. Nearly one million hardworking Americans in 30 states will soon be getting refunds of $500 each, with a check sent to their home address." Those refunds are going out in "just a few weeks," per POTUS Looks like Trump is narrowing in on EVERY affordability measure he can with the midterms less than 2 months away. The $500 can be done easily and unilaterally, while the $5K will require a NEW measure passed by Congress later this year Trump is also calling for his "Great Healthcare Plan" to give money DIRECTLY to the people, not big insurance! 🇺🇸 That's common sense.

    2.5K77523045151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202629x their median

    Trumps economic numbers are genuinely astounding. GDP 5.1% Real incomes highest ever. Poverty rate lowest ever. Food inflation below 20 year average. Housing prices falling fast. And yet his economic approval is underwater by double digits! It's weird.

    1.9K5621302443K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202625x their median

    So the government has been taking more than $5,000 from our hard earn money for years… spending it on gay Elmo in Afghanistan, and all of the sudden the President wants to give $$$ back to us and we’re up in arms about it? Sounds more like DIVIDEND, not a SUBSIDY if you ask me.

    1.8K3561421298K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202622x their median

    David Ellison reportedly eyes Elon Musk for Paramount equity investment - sparking fears at CNN: 'Really scary' https://t.co/rMv9nBRpz5 https://t.co/s6Amwp56vK

    1.7K20610837127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202618x their median

    JUST IN: Former President Obama says US government is "much less corrupt" than ever before

    1.4K8612145192K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202613x their median

    Watching POTUS UN speech: I’m just so proud we finally have a leader who is strong and putting us FIRST. We Americans have been so sick of limp Presidents APOLOGIZING for who we are, and catering to globalists. President Trump is PROUD of WHO WE ARE. AMERICA IS BACK!

    1.0K1374347.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20266.7x their median

    I’ve never believed politics should belong to the same people, the same institutions, and the same tired way of thinking forever. The next generation deserves representation that looks at the world with fresh eyes, has the courage to challenge what isn’t working, and isn’t afraid to bring a little common sense back into the conversation. That’s why I ran for Congress and wrote, Time to Choose. I sat down with the gorgeous @brittanymartinez25 Evie to talk about the road that brought me here — politics, building a company from a kitchen table, the lessons that bruised me along the way, and why I still believe ordinary people have far more power to change this country than we realize. There are a lot of women and men out there like me. And there are a lot of young Americans wondering whether there is still a place for them in public life. There is. This is for them. And a special message for my ladies…Why do we have to choose? Why can’t a woman want marriage and motherhood — and still want to build, lead, create, speak out, and make a difference? I’ve never believed ambition and family have to compete. I want both. Just a few little excerpts here … and read the full article on the link here https://t.co/l7hJ3XC9Mc!🤍🤍

    5424326415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.6x their median

    WE ARE THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD… ON OUR WORST DAY!

    48132517.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.4x their median

    Sunny Hostin's shocking reveal on 'The View' that she was holdout juror in NYC killer cannibal case https://t.co/rJyOCumIfx https://t.co/gJmWzknsoT

    16248911241K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 158K interactions, about 1712x its own typical post.

What is Catalina Lauf's engagement rate on X?
Catalina Lauf (@CatalinaLauf) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 229,481 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Catalina Lauf sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CatalinaLauf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CatalinaLauf post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going