PlayerSells
Back to @Castro1021's profile

Castro1021 engagement report

@Castro1021 - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.115%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.986%
158K views on a typical post
Reach
11.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.23/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Posts are seen about 158K times each, and 0.986% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 336K interactions, about 215x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, Castro1021 sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.046% to 0.318%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link20% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%8.9K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 2022215x their median

    My mom beat cancer. 🙏💜 https://t.co/cOktzPQtW5

    318K15K2.5K586View on X
  • Jul 15, 202696x their median

    I agree that Tuchel was at fault. But whatever tf Bellingham said to Messi here was also a factor…. 😂 https://t.co/gmdrYgA1PB

    137K10K1.6K1.6K10M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202670x their median

    The eyes don’t lie man. This brudda is addicted to these moments. Possessed. 👽 https://t.co/WHiI1rPuNj

    103K5.4K2221982.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202646x their median

    One thing is for certain….. Nothing will top the 2022 World Cup final. https://t.co/CxT0EEJjTm

    67K3.9K1792341.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202621x their median

    Nahhhhh man I know my English friends love some good banter. This has to be up there lmao. “Gordon…….fuck you 🤪🤪🤪” https://t.co/uxVa51jdND

    32K6998437811K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202619x their median

    Imagine playing like ass for 80 min. Entire world is watching & hating. Social media mocking you as you are down 2-0 in the World Cup. Instead of cracking under all that pressure, you lock the fuck in and win it 3-2 with a goal and an assist. ALL AT 39 YEARS OF AGE BTW…….. https://t.co/q6abV6YI3s

    27K2.2K23942492K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20266.3x their median

    Listen…..whether this is a foul or not isn’t the question. The question is, does this get called if it’s the other way around????? 🤔 https://t.co/k9t103uy6H

    8.7K37459292577K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20266.3x their median

    Thomas Tuchel thought Argentina were Mexico. 😂

    9.4K285515261K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20265.0x their median

    There goes the Alien. Once again….. Lionel Andrés Messi.

    7.5K344403143K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20264.9x their median

    what a picture I just took. 😳 https://t.co/RGsYdOtXHP

    7.5K122413120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Posts are seen about 158K times each, and 0.986% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 336K interactions, about 215x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Castro1021's engagement rate on X?
Castro1021 (@Castro1021) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,361,151 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, Castro1021 sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Castro1021 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Castro1021 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going