Back to @CarolineLucas's profile

Caroline Lucas engagement report

@CarolineLucas - 575K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.197%
of 575K followers
Per impression
2.87%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
6.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 575K followers, an engagement rate of 0.197%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 2.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #climate, #c4news, #hiroshima.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #climate, #c4news, #hiroshima.

Compared with accounts its own size

Caroline Lucas's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.197%, Caroline Lucas sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 20267.0x their median

    🚨 NEW: Zack Polanski has called for Andy Burnham to make fossil fuel companies pay for the cost of wildfires

    6.8K339641154833K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.6x their median

    Shocked to discover designating AI data centres as “National Critical Infrastructure” means water companies are prohibited from restricting water to them even in times of drought. Households will lose water first. Hear more on my @RestIsPolitics series👇 https://t.co/7PbrQlyw60

    2.3K1.5K866953K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.4x their median

    Is that it? If this is all that’s come from COBR, it’s pitifully inadequate. As crisis deepens, it beggars belief that there aren’t plans to increase resources for the fire service, max workplace temperature, community cool spaces & ban on new fossil fuels https://t.co/lZlBzWP1Kn

    2.6K8932845555K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.8x their median

    As the UN Secretary General says, every new fossil fuel project approved today makes tomorrow’s heatwaves more dangerous & our world less secure. I hope Andy Burnham is listening. Caving in to the fossil fuel lobby as Europe burns would be unforgivable https://t.co/NKJsx2cX4V

    1.9K7374856480K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.8x their median

    Glad to add my name to letter from 50 green groups urging PM to be clear that #climate breakdown is cause of the current extreme heat crisis. The public deserves leadership on the nature of the challenges the country faces & a robust plan to tackle them https://t.co/5wfTr4FZgR

    1.8K5826675072K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Two-thirds of UK news articles about wildfires this summer haven’t mentioned climate change - but sadly ignoring it doesn’t make it go away, it just makes averting the worst of it even harder https://t.co/xEUXAVP5Ls via @TheMediaLeader

    7662701611522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    #C4News showing food inflation between 2021 and 2026 Fish and Chips - £6.95 to £11.43 Burger - £5.87 to £8.63 Coffee - £2.50 to £3.43 https://t.co/UANqpgzIlK

    693258752750K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    Today is the 81st anniversary of the nuclear bombing of #Hiroshima. Yet despite the gut wrenching horror, the 9 nuclear states have *already* amassed the equivalent firepower of 145.000 Hiroshima bombs & still want more. This is madness. #NoMoreHiroshimas @CNDuk

    71919920723K viewsView on X
  • Feb 8, 2025

    It’s real! Excited that the paperback of #AnotherEngland is out on 20 Feb - with a new chapter on how Labour Govt needs to offer real change & tell a more inspiring, compelling story, if it’s to see off the threat posed by the increasingly populist Right https://t.co/kDbvpTscHl… https://t.co/M12PUr5WuH

    45528718612176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    What a damning reflection of the pitifully low priority currently given to climate adaptation - yet building local & national resilience to increasingly damaging impacts is vital to keeping people safe & building support for more ambitious emission cuts https://t.co/pQMn1TGtpe

    36713712429K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#climate#c4news#hiroshima#nomorehiroshimas#taxthebanks

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 575K followers, an engagement rate of 0.197%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 2.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #climate, #c4news, #hiroshima.

What is Caroline Lucas's engagement rate on X?
Caroline Lucas (@CarolineLucas) has an engagement rate of 0.197%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 575,099 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.197%, Caroline Lucas sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CarolineLucas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CarolineLucas post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going