Carl Higbie engagement report
@CarlHigbie - 263K followers on X
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 965 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.372%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 8.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 42x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jessicamauro, #johnjordan, #whitetaillandscapes.
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #jessicamauro, #johnjordan, #whitetaillandscapes.
Compared with accounts its own size
Carl Higbie's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.372%, Carl Higbie sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 77% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 215 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 7, 202642x their median
These are the people importing your daughters’ rapists. https://t.co/irVqwFes7X
- Aug 31, 202616x their median
Blahahahah. Bessent just b**** slapped Canada "At war with Canada? What are they gonna do, take their 2 submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sick 'em on us!?" https://t.co/6NaM9I2mnk
- Sep 23, 202616x their median
You think gas prices are high? Go ahead and vote for democrats that are TELLING you they are gonna shut down oil drilling…. See how you like those gas prices.
- Sep 22, 202611x their median
The world is weaponizing diesel prices to try to swing the midterms for democrats... https://t.co/7F8e0S7Am3
- Aug 31, 20269.9x their median
🚨 BREAKING — TRUMP WINS AT SCOTUS: The Supreme Court 5-4 has just GREENLIT White House ballroom military complex construction INDEFINITELY, with Chief Justice ROBERTS joining the liberals LET'S GO! 🔥 SCOTUS says the group who sued likely DOES NOT HAVE STANDING, exactly what Trump has been arguing Roberts made a HORRIBLE move siding against Trump. This suit was fallacious from the start! The "National Trust for Historic Preservation" can shove it. Construction is FULL steam ahead.
- Sep 18, 20269.5x their median
So we’re finding all this fraud… When do we get a tax refund?
- Sep 15, 20267.0x their median
This is the SAME thing republicans criticized democrats for doing with Diane Feinstein… Just resign Mitch and let someone else take it. https://t.co/O9A87qaUm8
- Apr 15, 20267.0x their median
“Pay your taxes… millions on welfare depend on it”😂😂😂 https://t.co/kQm1buABGe
- Sep 17, 20265.5x their median
Gotta be fair… this would be a pretty accurate republican ad for more than half of congress https://t.co/xFS4HjDOnn
- Sep 24, 20265.3x their median
If you think Trump kicking CNN out of the White House is bad… wait till you hear that Hillary wanted to drone strike Julian Assange: https://t.co/PxQs8vqdrx
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 965 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.372%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 8.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 42x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jessicamauro, #johnjordan, #whitetaillandscapes.
- What is Carl Higbie's engagement rate on X?
- Carl Higbie (@CarlHigbie) has an engagement rate of 0.372%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 263,244 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.372%, Carl Higbie sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CarlHigbie have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CarlHigbie post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.