Back to @CarlHigbie's profile

Carl Higbie engagement report

@CarlHigbie - 263K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.372%
of 263K followers
Per impression
8.56%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
4.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
965
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.97/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 965 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.372%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 8.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 42x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jessicamauro, #johnjordan, #whitetaillandscapes.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #jessicamauro, #johnjordan, #whitetaillandscapes.

Compared with accounts its own size

Carl Higbie's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.372%, Carl Higbie sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 215 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202642x their median

    These are the people importing your daughters’ rapists. https://t.co/irVqwFes7X

    33K6.3K811234607K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202616x their median

    Blahahahah. Bessent just b**** slapped Canada "At war with Canada? What are they gonna do, take their 2 submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sick 'em on us!?" https://t.co/6NaM9I2mnk

    13K2.1K56596150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202616x their median

    You think gas prices are high? Go ahead and vote for democrats that are TELLING you they are gonna shut down oil drilling…. See how you like those gas prices.

    11K2.8K1.2K105112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202611x their median

    The world is weaponizing diesel prices to try to swing the midterms for democrats... https://t.co/7F8e0S7Am3

    7.0K2.7K49513092K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20269.9x their median

    🚨 BREAKING — TRUMP WINS AT SCOTUS: The Supreme Court 5-4 has just GREENLIT White House ballroom military complex construction INDEFINITELY, with Chief Justice ROBERTS joining the liberals LET'S GO! 🔥 SCOTUS says the group who sued likely DOES NOT HAVE STANDING, exactly what Trump has been arguing Roberts made a HORRIBLE move siding against Trump. This suit was fallacious from the start! The "National Trust for Historic Preservation" can shove it. Construction is FULL steam ahead.

    7.8K1.5K22865174K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20269.5x their median

    So we’re finding all this fraud… When do we get a tax refund?

    7.8K9434324151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.0x their median

    This is the SAME thing republicans criticized democrats for doing with Diane Feinstein… Just resign Mitch and let someone else take it. https://t.co/O9A87qaUm8

    5.2K8676498446K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20267.0x their median

    “Pay your taxes… millions on welfare depend on it”😂😂😂 https://t.co/kQm1buABGe

    4.6K1.4K59273143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.5x their median

    Gotta be fair… this would be a pretty accurate republican ad for more than half of congress https://t.co/xFS4HjDOnn

    3.8K1.2K161145202K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20265.3x their median

    If you think Trump kicking CNN out of the White House is bad… wait till you hear that Hillary wanted to drone strike Julian Assange: https://t.co/PxQs8vqdrx

    3.6K1.5K533019K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jessicamauro#johnjordan#whitetaillandscapes

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 965 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.372%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 8.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 42x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jessicamauro, #johnjordan, #whitetaillandscapes.

What is Carl Higbie's engagement rate on X?
Carl Higbie (@CarlHigbie) has an engagement rate of 0.372%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 263,244 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.372%, Carl Higbie sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CarlHigbie have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CarlHigbie post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going