Back to @CanManhChimTo's profile

Cấn Mạnh 🍌 engagement report

@CanManhChimTo - 89K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.652%
of 89K followers
Per impression
2.27%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
28.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
582
interactions (median)
Saved
0.538%
138 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 582 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.652%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 2.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cấn Mạnh 🍌's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.652%, Cấn Mạnh 🍌 sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,862 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 17, 202627x their median

    Khẩu dâm nghe đã tai ghê https://t.co/TDm4gFOElQ

    11K4.2K5013877K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202623x their median

    Anh rể mò cu em vợ buổi đêm , mới đầu nó ko nghe sau nó cầm cu dí thẳng mồm cho bú https://t.co/5PBf2zocFM

    11K2.5K93407K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202617x their median

    Bật loa to lên nghe ảnh khẩu dâm móc cặc móc loz ra mà cho ảnh đụ https://t.co/UFuDCJaQUd

    7.6K2.4K88180K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202617x their median

    Cảm giác bị thk con mik đụ . Bú cặc thk con mik . Gọi thk cha dượng là vợ nó đã j đâu . Ổng rên khiến t nứng cặc https://t.co/601tWxdDGS

    8.0K1.9K113277K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.6x their median

    Khẩu dâm đụ Đăng chim nhiều qua bị khóa acc rồi kb instagram mới để chat sex với anh nha https://t.co/1d6gweB1MN follow ig tâm sự sục cu vs anh nha mấy bé https://t.co/wHzACoOed8

    4.1K1.4K612126K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20268.9x their median

    anh rể lột body ra gạ em vợ . ai ngờ bị em vợ đụ cho sướng tê loz https://t.co/YAqPBirKOL

    4.1K1.1K70170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20268.8x their median

    Sướng lồn e quá hu hu .khẩu dâm sướng lồn lắm bật vollum dở loz ra mà móc https://t.co/Rx1kMh9aCm

    4.0K1.2K42100K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20268.3x their median

    cha dượng đè loz con trai vk ra đụ . khẩu dâm sướng tê loz con trai https://t.co/vphB3wiOmH

    3.8K1.1K63162K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20267.5x their median

    khẩu dâm ,đụ anh bộ đội https://t.co/BiwxVwJ1QP

    3.3K1.1K23134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.9x their median

    Khẩu dâm đụ Đăng chim nhiều qua bị khóa acc rồi kb instagram mới để chat sex với anh nha https://t.co/1d6gweB1MN follow ig tâm sự sục cu vs anh nha mấy bé https://t.co/YmwHulp78B

    2.7K7764398K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 582 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.652%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 2.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is Cấn Mạnh 🍌's engagement rate on X?
Cấn Mạnh 🍌 (@CanManhChimTo) has an engagement rate of 0.652%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,224 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.652%, Cấn Mạnh 🍌 sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CanManhChimTo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CanManhChimTo post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going