Back to @CadioArena's profile

Cardio Arena engagement report

@CadioArena - 483K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.379%
of 483K followers
Per impression
0.208%
878K views on a typical post
Reach
181.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.126%
1.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 483K followers, an engagement rate of 0.379%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 878K times each, and 0.208% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 181.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #̢̛ͥ̀̽̽ͨ̌̓͆̇̀̽ͦͨͫͯ̏̎̇̈̚͜҉̕͢͏͡҉̸̶̛͢͡҉̵̨̭̳̘̹̫͔͖̜̠͖̫̲̖̱̤̻̖͉͢͞͡ͅͅ͏̸̷̢͑̊̀̐ͣͭͭ̉͂ͨ̽͒̊̎͛ͪ̊̎ͩͧ̀͝͠͠͏̸̵̵̷̵.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cardio Arena's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.379%, Cardio Arena sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 144 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 21, 202613x their median

    The number of times you wake up to urinate at nights say a lot about your health, in fact a very important one.

    22K965347652.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202612x their median

    Repetitive negative thinking is linked to Alzheimer’s protein buildup in the brain. https://t.co/AHUyqBAgTc

    18K2.9K2216302.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202612x their median

    ok dumb question... YouTube is free. but who's paying to store billions of hours of videos forever? the storage bill must be insane.

    21K133493513.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20269.0x their median

    31 years helping men grow monster sausages, yet no one believes me when I tell them this 🍆 1. Dip your balls in ice cold water https://t.co/0uLCZE51Hq

    15K1.2K373777.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20267.8x their median

    Una chica de 27 años llegó a urgencias con un dolor abdominal insoportable. Los médicos pensaron que sería algo relativamente común. Hasta que vieron su radiografía. Había algo ahí que definitivamente no debía estar... ¿Puedes encontrarlo antes de que te diga qué era? https://t.co/i0B8HYhqZN

    14K259348166.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20267.7x their median

    おい…これ毎朝してくれ…😭🫵🏻 肩周りゴリゴリ鳴るんだけど、一気に頭に血が巡ってマジやる気でる。しかも顔のむくみも一瞬で消えるし良いことしかない。 https://t.co/67ncSAbMfC

    11K2.8K845576K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20264.3x their median

    The truth about alcohol you should know. https://t.co/0ETJt5mNne

    5.9K1.2K51990841K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.9x their median

    Isn't it really good? https://t.co/UvGYlyNtTp

    6.4K561181512.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.9x their median

    Lymphatic drainage is the best way to get rid of bloating belly, facial fat, and reset your body's natural detox system. Here are 6 simple fixes to improve lymphatic flow:

    5.0K333188949K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20262.9x their median

    How does bamboo turn into clothes https://t.co/bieFGdUD50

    4.6K59468261.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#̢̛ͥ̀̽̽ͨ̌̓͆̇̀̽ͦͨͫͯ̏̎̇̈̚͜҉̕͢͏͡҉̸̶̛͢͡҉̵̨̭̳̘̹̫͔͖̜̠͖̫̲̖̱̤̻̖͉͢͞͡ͅͅ͏̸̷̢͑̊̀̐ͣͭͭ̉͂ͨ̽͒̊̎͛ͪ̊̎ͩͧ̀͝͠͠͏̸̵̵̷̵

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 483K followers, an engagement rate of 0.379%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 878K times each, and 0.208% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 181.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Cardio Arena's engagement rate on X?
Cardio Arena (@CadioArena) has an engagement rate of 0.379%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 483,008 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.379%, Cardio Arena sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CadioArena have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CadioArena post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going