Catherine Herridge engagement report
@C__Herridge - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.9K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.462%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 4.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 40% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Catherine Herridge's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.462%, Catherine Herridge sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 63% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 742 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 24, 202516x their median
BREAKING: Doctor Targeted by Biden DOJ After Blowing The Whistle on ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care For Minors at Texas Children’s Hospital Breaks Silence After All Charges Dropped; Calls on Trump Administration/DOJ to Investigate His Case “I was willing to go to jail” 00:00 Introduction 02:00 Reaction - Criminal Case Dismissed 04:20 All I Wanted Was To Hold My Baby 04:40 What Accountability Looks Like 06:40 Whistleblower Story Goes Viral 09:30 Retaliation 10:40 Biden DOJ/Alleged Threats 12:00 HHS Memo 13:50 Target Letter 15:15 Three Indictments 16:10 DOJ Errors 18:10 Darkest Moment 19:50 Gag Order 21:40 X Lifeline 22:20 Calls on Trump Administration/DOJ to Investigate his case 23:20 Responses Subscriptions @C__Herridge support independent journalism. Subscribe today!
- Apr 1, 202517x their median
BREAKING: FBI Imposed “Gag Order” About Hunter Biden Laptop After Employee Accidentally Confirmed Its Authenticity To Twitter Newly released internal FBI chat messages reveal senior bureau officials actively shutting down discussion of the laptop’s credibility days before the 2020 Presidential election This is a CatherineHerridgeReports @C__Herridge / Public @Shellenberger Joint Investigation An FBI official admitted to House investigators that an FBI employee had inadvertently confirmed the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop to Twitter on a conference call the morning of October 14, 2020, the day the New York Post published a story about it. “I recall that when the question came up, an intelligence analyst assigned to the Criminal Investigative Division said something to the effect of, ‘Yes, the laptop is real’,” the then Russia unit chief testified in a closed door transcribed interview. “I believe it was an (Office of General Counsel) attorney assigned to the (Foreign Influence Task Force) stepped in and said, ‘We will not comment further on this topic.’” For the first time, and with a change of administration, the FBI has now turned over to GOP House investigators the internal chat messages that show Bureau leadership actively silenced its employees. The FBI, which had a special task force to counter foreign election interference, could have set the record straight by confirming the laptop was real and the subject of an ongoing criminal probe. Instead, FBI leadership allowed the false narrative about the laptop to gain momentum. The FBI provided the chat messages to congressional investigators with heavy redactions. Some of the redactions on the chats are marked “OGC AGC,” which appears to mean that they were made by the FBI’s Office of General Counsel and Associate General Counsel. An individual whose name is blacked out, tells Elvis M. Chan, the San Francisco-based FBI special agent tasked with interacting with social media companies, there was a “gag order” on discussion of Hunter Biden’s laptop. In a separate exchange, Chan is told “official response no commen(t).” In the chat, the FBI officials showed awareness that the laptop may have contained evidence of criminal activity. Asked Chan, “actually what kind of case is the laptop thing? corruption? campaign financing?” Another FBI employee responds, “CLOSE HOLD —” after which the response is redacted. To which Chan responds, “oh crap” appearing to underscore the serious nature of the probe, which included felony tax charges. Chan adds, “ok. It ends here”. In the same conversation, Chan is asked if “Anyone discussing that NYPost article on the Biden’s?” Chan responds, “yes we are. c d confirmed an active investigation. No further comment.” “C D” is likely shorthand for the FBI’s Criminal Division. Said another FBI employee, whose name was redacted by the Bureau, “please do not discuss biden matter.” We asked for a response from the bureau and the FBI employees identified in the chat messages. An FBI spokesman declined to comment. We go in-depth on the chat messages for subscribers!
- Sep 11, 20269.2x their median
In 24 years of watching 9/11 memorials and the reading of the names of the dead, I have never heard applause. This morning the crowd did — because one brave widow, @TerrySStrada, looked at the leaders in front of her and refused to let the day pass in silence. She called out Saudi Arabia’s role, the broken promises, and a string of administrations that protected the Kingdom instead of helping to deliver justice for the families. A stunning, must-watch minute. Stand with the families.
- Sep 9, 20254.4x their median
BREAKING: Newly Declassified FBI/CIA Reports Reveal Two Saudi Government Employees “May Have Served As An Advance Team” For 9/11 Hijackers These records challenge the official 9/11 narrative shifting the timeline back to December 1998, almost three years before al-Qaeda terrorists killed nearly 3,000 Americans on September 11th, 2001 1:17 Saudi Government Employees “May Have Served as (9/11) Advance Team” 2:20 FBI: Ties to Al-Qaeda 3:00 Alleged Advance Team Lead Buried In Secret Government Records 4:00 Arrival In Southern California December 1998 – 13 Months Before Hijackers 5:20 Hijackers’ Support Network - “50/50” Chance Advance Knowledge 6:00 Letters to Saudi Government Official “Complete Cooperation” 6:35 February 2000 Video: “Welcome Party” 9/11 Hijackers 7:50 Hijackers’ Road Trip Oklahoma + Missouri 8:40 Washington D.C. “Casing” Video / Bin Laden 9/11 Targets 9:20 Trump Administration: For 9/11 Families, Once In A Lifetime Chance For Answers 11:10 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Response
- Sep 11, 20264.2x their median
1998 DECLASSIFIED PRESIDENT'S DAILY BRIEF: The System Was Already Blinking Red. Under President Clinton, intelligence indicated "Bin Laden Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft." "Some member of the Bin Laden network have received hijack training.." "Bin Laden organization or its allies are moving closer to implementing US attacks.." Disconnecting the Dots. Declassified records @cia
- Aug 23, 20264.0x their median
STARING TONIGHT: And Every Sunday, Until The 25th Anniversary, I Will Post Investigative Content About The Untold Stories of 9/11. I Begin With FBI records That Have Been Withheld From The Public And The 9/11 Families About Who Helped The Hijackers Inside The US. There Is So Much More To The Story.....
- Sep 9, 20264.0x their median
9/11: Twenty-five years ago this week, I collected ash in an envelope after a woman told me she was taking ash home in a shoebox so her family would have something to bury. The woman said she had driven all night and all day to NYC because her sibling had been at the World Trade Center for a business meeting. That’s when I realized the towers had been turned into a furnace by the Al-Qaeda terrorists. Americans were jumping to their deaths— some holding hands—rather than be burned alive. From Fox to CBS, and now as an independent journalist, I have kept that envelope in a safe place, hoping the chance would come one day to analyze it and share it. Since 9/11 more Americans have died from toxic exposure than died in the attacks themselves. Never Forget is a solemn pledge.
- Sep 15, 20263.8x their median
FBI AGENT: PROSECUTE MUSK OVER DOGE "...happy to write the case opening and find a prosecutor (or at least try)... No, I am not kidding." - FBI Special Agent 'sought to criminally investigate @elonmusk after Musk asked government officials to list five things they accomplished in a week,' per 2025 emails released @ChuckGrassley - FBI Agent attempted to target Musk's Special Government Employee status (SGE) - Email further exposes double standard on SGEs - DOJ refused to investigate Huma Abedin when she was an SGE for then-SEC State Hillary Clinton and worked for the Clinton Foundation - Agent compares Musk use of (twitter) X to Clinton's use of unsecured personal server for government business where highly classified information was transmitted
- Aug 12, 20263.5x their median
BREAKING: Declassified Records Reveal Alleged Tampering With Confidential Source Info to Blunt Ukraine Corruption Claims, Benefit Bidens Declassified "Delta Project" by DNI @TulsiGabbard's team found: - @FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force unofficially formed a group of analysts who gathered "any/all derogatory information" about Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma as well as the so-called "Ukraine Narrative" - Analysts "red flagged" negative reporting, had "administrative access" to files and deemed "Russian disinformation" - "Round River" Team operated leading up to and through the 2020 US Presidential Election - Some long standing confidential sources eventually "terminated" after reporting negative intel about Ukraine/Bidens - 'Round River' did not 'corroborate any of the (actual) allegations of the 'Ukraine Narrative'
- Sep 14, 20263.5x their median
9/11 SECRET FILES: Now @realDonaldTrump is getting involved FBI/CIA records reveal two Saudi government employees “may have served as an advance team” for the hijackers. After our exclusive 2025 investigation, the 9/11 families pressed the US government to release the FBI's analysis of Saudi phone records that is still hidden from the public. There is compelling evidence the US-based support network secured housing, bank accounts, driver’s licenses and even helped identify flight schools for the hijackers. Over the weekend, President Trump said he will consider releasing more records in response to @TerrySStrada Grateful to see @AP @Reuters and other media outlets pick up the coverage that has been driven by independent reporting @X
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.9K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.462%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 4.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 40% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
- What is Catherine Herridge's engagement rate on X?
- Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) has an engagement rate of 0.462%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,058,040 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.462%, Catherine Herridge sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @C__Herridge have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @C__Herridge post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.