Back to @C_3C_3's profile

C3 engagement report

@C_3C_3 - 346K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.464%
of 346K followers
Per impression
7.89%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
5.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 346K followers, an engagement rate of 0.464%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 7.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

C3's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.464%, C3 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 234 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202619x their median

    The left-wing has a network of hundreds of blogs (and countless Telegram channels) dedicated to doxxing and harassing right-wingers. If you click the link below, you can see how organized this gets: they're grouped in cities, they share addresses and license plate information, they include family and friends. Talk about asymmetrical treatment. Scroll below to click directly to the network of NoBlogs doxxing.

    21K7.6K536214302K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202617x their median

    How could any jury look at this little onesie and not decide in 5 seconds? This is a real low point for humanity. https://t.co/Y362ubpgsV

    24K2.9K32263266K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.6x their median

    Listen to every word… After the last hearing on Sanctuary Cities Pramila Jayapal complained they had more pressing matters… More important business? Like Marcus Coleman’s little girl Dalilah being disabled by an illegal. Dems don’t care. They need illegals. Pure evil. https://t.co/RPMDfVU3F7

    8.9K3.1K1558479K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.4x their median

    Want your blood to boil? Senators are being paid $17,640 on their 37 day vacation. Theft.

    6.7K1.7K933443K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.7x their median

    Modern Feminists now support killing the unborn and the born. It’s not a typo. The unborn can be killed because “my body my choice” and the born can be killed because of “postpartum depression”. Think about that. That’s Modern Feminism. That’s a Death Cult. That’s Evil.

    4.6K1.2K1482028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.9x their median

    The Left called Charlie Kirk racist because he was a threat to their agenda. Not because he was actually racist. Leftists knew it. Same reason they call… Trump a Fascist. Elon a Nazi. And anyone they fear a slur. So their mentally ill followers believe it and act. Evil.

    2.5K51231418K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.8x their median

    Timothy Jones Jr. Strangled his children just like Lindsay Clancy. He claimed schizophrenia and hearing a “gremlin” voice. A jury of 7 man and 5 women… Found him guilty in 6 hours. https://t.co/5YuWE7mXL6

    2.1K622472123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.6x their median

    🚨 Vice President JD Vance is taking the White House briefing room tomorrow. Not a photo-op. A press briefing. This will be his third time behind that podium. The press corps hates it when he shows up. He answers. He doesn’t flinch. He doesn’t play their game.

    2.3K25943533K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Remember they called Trump a racist for saying these were who crossed into America illegally? 200 Illegal Rapists, Murders and Child Predators arrested by ICE in NY. Operation Rotten Apple. He was right again. https://t.co/AVDjOVwCMy

    1.2K37414410.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Once you know this everything makes sense… 56% of white liberal women age 18-29 have been told they have a mental health condition by a Doctor. That was in 2020. Imagine how bad it is now. The Lindsay Clancy jury makes total sense. Mentally ill judging the mentally ill.

    1.3K24542115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 346K followers, an engagement rate of 0.464%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 7.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is C3's engagement rate on X?
C3 (@C_3C_3) has an engagement rate of 0.464%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 345,654 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.464%, C3 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @C_3C_3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @C_3C_3 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going