Back to @C_3C_3's profile

C3 engagement report

@C_3C_3 - 356K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.519%
of 356K followers
Per impression
11.7%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
4.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.122%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.519%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 11.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

C3's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.519%, C3 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 196 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202632x their median

    White people are a 8% global minority and yet white majority countries are the only places multiculturalism is ever pushed. Literally the only places. Weird, right?!

    50K6.5K498140619K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202629x their median

    How could any jury look at this little onesie and not decide in 5 seconds? This is a real low point for humanity. https://t.co/Y362ubpgsV

    47K5.9K580134685K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202621x their median

    The left-wing has a network of hundreds of blogs (and countless Telegram channels) dedicated to doxxing and harassing right-wingers. If you click the link below, you can see how organized this gets: they're grouped in cities, they share addresses and license plate information, they include family and friends. Talk about asymmetrical treatment. Scroll below to click directly to the network of NoBlogs doxxing.

    28K9.9K661264413K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202616x their median

    Dear America: You know what made prices go up? Biden mass-importing over 20,000,000 illegals. You know what will make prices go down? Trump mass-deporting them.

    18K4.6K5.6K302293K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202614x their median

    Has anyone done more damage to our kids than Randi Weingarten in the last decade? A childless Marxist. Teachers Union president with a $560,000+ per year salary. Wrote a book calling parents FASCISTS with union money. Now she’s lying about deporting illegals. An evil woman. https://t.co/rYDNpvLZyK

    19K5.8K1.2K281139K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202614x their median

    🚨 NEW TOOL: MASS MIGRATION EXPLORER 🚨 🔎 FOLLOW THE PEOPLE. TRACE THE MONEY. 💰 Show this to your friends who think the Trump administration didn't do anything! I've built a tool that maps who came, where they settled, how they got here, and which federally funded organizations were paid to resettle them. This is the most complete tool that I know of which puts together the money network. The data was pulled from ORR; FEMA pulls will happen soon! Here's what you can do: ✅ Watch the border change: monthly encounters fell 96%, from 301,981 in Dec 2023 to 12,242 in Aug 2026. All 19 months since Feb 2025 combined are fewer than December 2023 alone. ✅ County-by-county map, 1990–2024: foreign-born share, growth, and filters for 48 countries and every world region. ✅ See WHY counties changed: 116 of the biggest jumps explained with sources. ✅ Legal-pathway layers: refugee arrivals, unaccompanied minors released to sponsors, H-1B/H-2A/H-2B, immigration court cases, green cards. ✅ The NGO network: 1,150+ organizations, with every link backed by a USASpending award or a row in an IRS filing. ✅ Filter by faith network: Catholic, Lutheran, Jewish, Muslim, Interfaith and more. ✅ See what was cut: 63 federal awards ($186M) terminated or cut short since Jan 20, 2025. Follow the money through: 🔹 International Rescue Committee 🔹 HIAS 🔹 Church World Service 🔹 Global Refuge (formerly LIRS) 🔹 World Relief 🔹 US Conference of Catholic Bishops 🔹 USCRI 🔹 ECDC 🔹 Bethany Christian Services 🔹 Episcopal Migration Ministries 🔹 Southwest Key, BCFS and the ORR shelter network 💡 Anyone who says this administration didn't change anything should look at the chart. Keeping these results takes more Republicans in Congress. Vote straight Republican Nov 3. 🇺🇸 👇 Try it now: [link in next post]

    17K7.7K499381299K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202612x their median

    The Biden Administration… Tracked Barron Trump but not 400,000 kids that crossed the border. Sickos.

    18K3.5K764681K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20269.4x their median

    Do you know what that the perfect environment for a virus to grow is? An Election Year. It’s Science.

    14K2.5K1358982K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20267.5x their median

    Sally Yates remember her? Sally lied to frame innocent General Flynn and spy on innocent Donald Trump. She should be in prison but since she isn’t… Now she’s going to review (lie & frame) the Cornell 7 case. For political purposes. You can bet on that. She’s a sick woman. https://t.co/v3vLycNXRj

    9.8K3.6K2227164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.7x their median

    Listen to every word… After the last hearing on Sanctuary Cities Pramila Jayapal complained they had more pressing matters… More important business? Like Marcus Coleman’s little girl Dalilah being disabled by an illegal. Dems don’t care. They need illegals. Pure evil. https://t.co/RPMDfVU3F7

    8.9K3.1K1558479K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.519%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 11.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is C3's engagement rate on X?
C3 (@C_3C_3) has an engagement rate of 0.519%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 355,660 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.519%, C3 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @C_3C_3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @C_3C_3 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going