Back to @CSalvatore's profile

Chris Salvatore engagement report

@CSalvatore - 536K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.113%
of 536K followers
Per impression
1.34%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
8.45%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
605
interactions (median)
Saved
0.267%
121 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Saturday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 605 interactions against 536K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 669x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.113%, Chris Salvatore sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link67% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 101 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 16, 2026669x their median

    For anyone who used a computer between 1990 & 2005… what’s the one game you still think about?

    14K69340K7.3K11M viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202663x their median

    Me after eating Taco Bell https://t.co/3BlH5dAfom

    36K2.0K661092.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202625x their median

    friday pump please ignore the uncrustables defrosting on my desk https://t.co/Ve2lWrab5i

    14K5521104221K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 202618x their median

    Beach vs shore https://t.co/0vCHIdBKpB

    9.7K5513091391.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 11, 202697x their median

    The opening is insane! 🤯 KATSEYE performs “PINKY UP” at Coachella, opening the set with strong crowd energy. KATSEYE PINKY UP COACHELLA #KATCHELLA #KATSEYECHELLA #KATSEYE_COACHELLA https://t.co/BmshhZ8IYi

    8.0K77630105185K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 202692x their median

    Baby elephant bullied by others because it's chubby ❤🤎 https://t.co/gT6FgaEEpd

    7.6K59978115538K viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 202685x their median

    guys this is kinda insane…live vocals, choreo so synced up, all the rehearsal time it takes to execute and seamlessly rotate around each member…i know there work schedule is insane https://t.co/0qjYYEBSA2

    7.5K3122416183K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 202611x their median

    A person who possesses a lot of energy, including sexual energy, also possesses a great deal of healing energy. This is because sexual energy is healing energy at the spiritual level. The best healers possess abundant sexual energy.

    5.8K6084861256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202610x their median

    🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/8hrtSKH626

    5.8K213491140K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20269.1x their median

    happy place 🏡 https://t.co/muVOp68NFU

    5.3K146373113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 605 interactions against 536K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 669x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chris Salvatore's engagement rate on X?
Chris Salvatore (@CSalvatore) has an engagement rate of 0.113%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 536,354 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.113%, Chris Salvatore sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CSalvatore have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @CSalvatore post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going