Back to @CRRJA5's profile

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅 engagement report

@CRRJA5 - 420K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 420K followers
Per impression
2.02%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0.115%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 420K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 2.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.311% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 3310x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #truth.

Compared with accounts its own size

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, 🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅 sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20263310x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Nick Shirley just went FULL THROTTLE at the EPIC Islamic Center in Texas. He showed up to film. Peacefully. They didn’t debate him. They didn’t welcome questions. They hunted him down on their property and told him to get out. A Muslim man follows him, pointing, demanding: “Are you a Muslim?! This is NOT for you.” Not “this is private property.” Not “please stay on the sidewalk.” Straight up: You’re not one of us. Leave. Nick didn’t flinch. Camera rolling the entire time. This isn’t a misunderstanding. This is the mask slipping. They built it. They control it. And they just told America, on camera, that parts of Texas are off-limits unless you convert. Cohabitation? They just said the quiet part out loud. Watch every second. This one is going to travel.

    61K23K2.1K8441.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026884x their median

    🚨 JUST IN: $59 MILLION for NYC “luxury” hotels housing illegal immigrants — RETURNED to FEMA. 4 employees FIRED. DHS just dropped the hammer: Four FEMA staffers (including the CFO) got the boot for circumventing leadership and unilaterally cutting a $59 million check for New York City migrant hotels. The money is being clawed back. Congressman Mike Lawler (R-NY) nailed it on Fox: “These funds have been misappropriated going back to the Biden administration. New York City, a sanctuary city, has been wasting billions — with a B — on free housing, clothing, food, education, and healthcare for illegal immigrants, including criminal aliens.” Sanctuary cities got away with this for years while American taxpayers footed the bill. Under Trump, that ends. No more incentivizing open borders. No more deep-state end-runs around the President. The border is being secured. The gravy train is being shut down. This is what accountability looks like.

    17K5.3K317121339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026705x their median

    🚨KABOOM💥🚨Democrats are accused of violating the Logan Act by colluding with Mark Carney’s Canadian government to undermine President Donald Trump’s trade policies. These backchannel diplomatic maneuvers illegally interfere in active US-Canada trade disputes.🚨 https://t.co/faPU4Ho1gb

    11K5.5K1.4K399775K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026444x their median

    🚨 JOHN SOLOMON JUST HIT THE MOTHERLODE. 🚨 NSA intercepts from 2022 just DROPPED. Ukrainian officials + Biden’s own USAID insiders in Kyiv were caught discussing a plan to take HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of YOUR tax dollars — money meant for “clean energy” — and launder 90% of it straight into Joe Biden’s 2024 campaign and the DNC. Fake infrastructure projects. Layered U.S. subcontractors. Designed so no one could follow the money. This wasn’t aid. This was a slush fund. They built biolabs with stolen American money… then they tried to steal the election with the rest of it. Tulsi Gabbard is now hunting the records. Criminal referrals are on the table. The same people who called YOU a “threat to democracy” were running a foreign money-laundering operation against you. Was the entire Ukraine war just the biggest Democrat money-laundering scheme in history? Watch Solomon drop the receipts. Then share this like your country depends on it. 🇺🇸🔥 #UkraineLaundering #BidenDNC #JohnSolomon #Motherlode

    6.9K4.2K268189212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Don’t let the door hit you in the A$$. Bye 👋 Bye 👋 https://t.co/C0eejarItD

    1561201.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Poland did pass a 2009–2010 law making pharmacological sex-drive treatment mandatory after prison for certain child/incest rapists. 💥Children First. https://t.co/MyJfzY7l6p

    12710951 viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Julian Assange founded WikiLeaks. In 2010 it published Chelsea Manning’s cache: the “Collateral Murder” Apache video from Baghdad, the Iraq War Logs, the Afghan War Diaries, Guantánamo files, and ~250,000 State Department cables. Those files showed civilian casualty counts the Pentagon had downplayed, torture and rendition, and diplomacy that did not match public talking points. The U.S. never said the documents were fake. The fight was over whether publishing them was journalism or a crime. In 2019 the U.S. charged him under the Espionage Act — not for lying, for obtaining and publishing classified “national defense” information. That statute does not care if the public interest was high. After years in Ecuador’s London embassy and then Belmarsh, he took a 2024 plea in Saipan: guilty to one count, sentenced to time served (~62 months already done), and went home to Australia.

    124001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Wake up, America 🇺🇸 The Enemy Within. https://t.co/9nL4lVE2Z8

    10400239 viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Polish MEP Dominik Tarczyński. He’s a Law and Justice (PiS) member of the European Parliament. His brand is “Be Like Poland” — red hat and all. For years he’s said Poland’s line on illegal migration is zero. At rallies he even asks the crowd: “What’s my favorite number?” Answer: zero. That’s the policy pitch: no illegal crossings, send people back. 👏🏻

    83001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Texas banned “sexually oriented” shows around kids. Judge David Hittner, a Reagan-appointed 87-year-old judge just killed the law again. The 5th Circuit already let it take effect. This isn’t over. Hitter blocked it in 2023. The 5th Circuit later let it take effect (~March 2026) and sent it back. On Aug. 25, 2026, Hittner struck it down again as overbroad and vague under the First Amendment. Ken Paxton says he’ll appeal. 💥Texas wrote a child-protection law so broad a judge said it could hit Dolly Parton, Elvis, and Olympic swimmers. That’s why it fell. Texas, write the law again, and make no room for loopholes.

    0400301 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#truth

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 420K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 2.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.311% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 3310x its own typical post.

What is 🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅's engagement rate on X?
🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅 (@CRRJA5) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 420,254 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, 🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅 sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CRRJA5 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CRRJA5 post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going