Back to @CRN's profile

CRN engagement report

@CRN - 47K followers on X

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 47K followers
Per impression
0.416%
481 views on a typical post
Reach
1.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 481 times each, and 0.416% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #xchange.

Compared with accounts its own size

CRN's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, CRN sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link98% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 98% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 638 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 20267.0x their median

    Congratulations to the following winners of our second annual Best of the Channel Awards! You can learn about all of the 2026 winners on our website here: https://t.co/FeUJxkAl9P. Together with our parent company, @TheChannelCo, we hosted an awards ceremony last night in Atlanta to spotlight these exceptional leaders helping shape the future of the IT channel. - Best Emerging Leader: Stacie Nadeau​, @IngramMicroInc - Best Solution Provider CEO: Jon Groves​, @LogicalisUS - Best Solution Provider Channel Visionary: Jim Keller​, @Quantiphi - Best Vendor Channel Visionary: Gordon Lord​, @SchneiderElec - Best Channel Achiever: Brook Lee​, @rev_io_hq - Best Channel Chief: @wademcfarland43​, @Lenovo - Best AI Solution Provider: @Ahead - Best AI Vendor: @cyera_io - Best Channel Marketing Team: @zscaler - Best Solution Provider Team: @GuidePointSec - Best Channel Team: @TDSYNNEX - Best Security Solution Provider: @wwt_inc - Best Security Vendor: @AWNetworks - Best Vendor: @HaloPSA_ - Best Solution Provider: Quantiphi - Lifetime Achievement Award recipient: Felise Katz, PKA Technologies -- @SchneiderNA

    12200573 viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20266.0x their median

    Congratulations to the winners of the 2026 @CRN Best of the Channel Awards! 🏆 🎉 Stay tuned for more photos and details on the winners of the second annual awards tomorrow morning 👀 We announced and celebrated the following stand-out channel leaders, teams and companies within the IT channel tonight at an awards ceremony at @TheFoxTheatre in Atlanta, Ga.: - Best Emerging Leader: Stacie Nadeau​, @IngramMicroInc - Best Solution Provider CEO: Jon Groves​, @LogicalisUS - Best Solution Provider Channel Visionary: Jim Keller​, @Quantiphi - Best Vendor Channel Visionary: Gordon Lord​, @SchneiderElec - Best Channel Achiever: Brook Lee​, @rev_io_hq - Best Channel Chief: @wademcfarland43​, @Lenovo - Best AI Solution Provider: @Ahead - Best AI Vendor: @cyera_io - Best Channel Marketing Team: @zscaler - Best Solution Provider Team: @GuidePointSec - Best Channel Team: @TDSYNNEX - Best Security Solution Provider: @wwt_inc - Best Security Vendor: @AWNetworks - Best Vendor: @HaloPSA_ - Best Solution Provider: Quantiphi -- @SchneiderNA

    11100892 viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.0x their median

    As AI agents begin to work across a variety of browsers and IT systems, a massive challenge is arising for businesses whose identity security controls were designed around humans, according to @1Password CTO Nancy Wang. Wang tells CRN Security or Else! podcast host @KyleAlspach that the stark differences between how agentic and human workers will operate is creating a major need for identity security to adapt across the industry and channel. You can watch or listen to the latest episode of the podcast here: https://t.co/ejRRd8RpUx.

    2121496 viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.0x their median

    Proofpoint announced that it has reached an agreement to acquire @varonis in a $6.3 billion deal that aims to turn the vendor into an even bigger force in the red-hot data and AI security market. @CRN cybersecurity reporter and Senior Editor @KyleAlspach breaks down five key things to know about @proofpoint’s acquisition of Varonis, including managed service provider (MSP) perspective from Brian Betzen, founder and chief technologist at veraTECH Solutions: https://t.co/DmU1lQij3k

    3021585 viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.0x their median

    Nutanix CEO @RajivRamaswami says VMware migrations are a 10-year opportunity for channel partners, that he wants partners to embrace @nutanix on public clouds, and is “surprised” that VMware deauthorized solution provider powerhouse Insight Enterprises. “From a business perspective why do you want to alienate your big partners? It just doesn’t make sense from my perspective,” Ramaswami said onstage during an interview with @CRN Executive Editor @jfollett and Executive News Editor @StevenJBurke at #XChange Best of Breed, hosted by our parent company, @TheChannelCo, this week in Atlanta, Ga. Ramaswami said there’s still “anywhere from 100,000 to 200,000” VMware by Broadcom customer opportunities for Nutanix to go after as partners will have a decade to win over concerned VMware clients. From Nutanix’s acquisition of Ryax Technologies to its AI hopes, here’s what else Ramaswami shared with Jen and Steve about his vision, strategy and more: @NutanixPartners https://t.co/lmse4RCZrp

    4200758 viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.0x their median

    The rapid advancement of ultra-powerful AI models for cybersecurity means that a large majority of work inside the security operations center (SOC) is on track to become predominantly agentic in the not-too-distant future, @AWNetworks CEO Nick Schneider said this week at #XChange Best of Breed, hosted by our parent company, @TheChannelCo, in Atlanta, Ga. At the same time, emerging AI technology, including capabilities now under development by the security operations platform vendor, could also make it easier for partners to inject human judgment within crucial SOC processes, Schneider said in response to questions from @CRN editors during the conference. CRN cybersecurity reporter and Senior Editor @KyleAlspach has more details from Schneider, as well as partner perspective from Manak Ahluwalia, president and CEO of solution provider Aqueduct Technologies: https://t.co/NT5hcvZlWA

    3120620 viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20262.5x their median

    Paco Lebron’s journey from running a managed service provider (MSP) part-time to leading MSP Owners Group has taught him that building a successful business requires more than technical expertise. It takes accountability, the willingness to learn from mistakes and a community of people who understand all those challenges. Lebron, CEO of ProdigyTeks and now CEO of MSP Owners Group, spoke at XChange NexGen, hosted by our parent company, @TheChannelCo, this week in Orlando, Fla., about his 13-year entrepreneurial journey, including the struggles of leaving corporate America, finding his first clients, building a profitable business and eventually exiting his MSP while remaining involved in its future. Success, he stressed, was never something he achieved on his own. The relationships he built with fellow MSP owners, mentors and business partners helped him work through tough decisions. CJ Fairfield has the details, including perspective on Lebron’s message from Marcial Velez, CEO at Xperteks Computer Consultancy, here: https://t.co/ph2fWgWqxn.

    4100428 viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20262.5x their median

    Employees are using AI tools regardless of whether their employers are ready for it. With the inevitability of shadow AI, solution providers are working to balance safeguarding clients’ data and IT estates with enabling AI use and experimentation. @CRN Senior Associate Editors CJ Fairfield and @WadeMillward and Senior Editor @DylanOnChips asked the following solution providers at XChange NexGen 2026, hosted by our parent company, @TheChannelCo, this week in Orlando, Fla., “How big of a concern is shadow AI, and how are you helping customers manage it?” How are you approaching shadow AI at your MSP? - Kelly Yeh, president, Phalanx Technology Group - Marcial Velez, president and CEO, Xperteks Computer Consultancy - Wayne Roye, CEO, Troinet - John Medaska, CEO, JMXi - Dylan Borden, vice president, operations, growth, Four Winds IT - Hani Eshack, founder and CEO, Critical IT Solutions - David Yates, founder and managing principal, Geeks-r-Us https://t.co/Fplcl8ESIp

    3200698 viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20262.5x their median

    The threat of attackers potentially exploiting a pair of critical-severity PHP vulnerabilities could persist for some time, even though the initial evidence of exploitation of the PHP2Shell flaws appears to be modest, according to Justin Timothy, threat intelligence consultant at @GuidePointSec. @KyleAlspach has the details: https://t.co/OxsfPCvscV

    3200580 viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20262.5x their median

    Two critical vulnerabilities in PHP are facing active exploitation attempts, creating an urgent need for widespread patching, according to cybersecurity researchers from @wiz_io, @watchtowrcyber, @HuntressLabs, @CrowdStrike, and @SentinelOne. The vulnerabilities, together known as “PHP2Shell” and considered a “critical” risk with severity ratings of 9.2 out of 10.0, can enable attackers to execute code remotely without authentication. PHP is a key technology behind numerous web platforms including WordPress and Drupal. @CRN cybersecurity reporter and Senior Editor @KyleAlspach breaks down five key things to know about the “critical” PHP vulnerabilities and exploitation activity: @_JohnHammond @0xAmit https://t.co/sGQJ0VurzT

    4100727 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#xchange

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 481 times each, and 0.416% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

What is CRN's engagement rate on X?
CRN (@CRN) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 46,566 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, CRN sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CRN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CRN post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going