Back to @CMEGroup's profile

CME Group engagement report

@CMEGroup - 712K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 712K followers
Per impression
0.324%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 712K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.324% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 160 interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fedwatch, #hoodsummit, #naturalgas.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #fedwatch, #hoodsummit, #naturalgas.

Compared with accounts its own size

CME Group's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, CME Group sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link59% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 59% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 20264.2x their median

    The wait is almost over: Trade 50+ of the biggest names in U.S. equities with Single Stock futures starting July 27. https://t.co/IPuIyZSitI https://t.co/s2Vop5a5uf

    9633112060K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.1x their median

    Get ready to trade new larger- and Micro-sized Bitcoin Cash and Uniswap futures in our 24/7, CFTC-regulated marketplace. https://t.co/uixnqsgMjV

    1022821620K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.6x their median

    Start trading the infrastructure of tomorrow with Compute futures, launching October 5. View contract specifications to see how the product is structured, including trading hours, tick increments and settlement mechanisms powered by Silicon Data’s real-time GPU benchmarks. https://t.co/9E193zJ6BT

    832092446K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.0x their median

    We're thrilled to join Robinhood's HOOD Summit as a presenting sponsor to showcase how smaller E-nano equity index contracts make the markets more accessible than ever. Learn more: https://t.co/EmZo8jzlPX https://t.co/fssUeXX9ZN

    821221017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.8x their median

    Our suite of Single-Asset Crypto Benchmarks now includes Ethena (ENA). Access real-time pricing and regional reference rates across London, New York and APAC. https://t.co/t4YA984qRV https://t.co/6y3tPyIgVu

    79183522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.4x their median

    Single Stock futures liquidity is on the rise. Over 50,000 contracts traded yesterday (Aug 4), led by $NVDA, $INTC and $AMZN futures. https://t.co/zfMtqhGaOT

    70146213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.3x their median

    This August*, E-nano Equity Index futures will provide exposure to the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 and DJIA at a fraction of the cost. https://t.co/pWOCEPaQmE https://t.co/O8bxNvU98H

    601351017K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.1x their median

    The countdown is on. Single Stock futures arrive July 27.* https://t.co/G0NXaYkrGW https://t.co/lctD1EHHRR

    57133514K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    To mark the official launch of E-nano Equity Index futures, our Equity team hit Times Square to celebrate in front of the @Nasdaq Tower. Built for precise benchmark exposure, E-nano Equity Index futures are our most accessible contracts yet. https://t.co/7tPwZjU6c5

    5785113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.8x their median

    One week in: E-nano Equity Index futures volume is on the rise, driven by E-nano Nasdaq-100 futures (NNQ). Start trading today on: @RobinhoodApp | @NinjaTrader | @IBKR https://t.co/12dsajBaGq

    46911315K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fedwatch#hoodsummit#naturalgas#oott

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 712K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.324% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 160 interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fedwatch, #hoodsummit, #naturalgas.

What is CME Group's engagement rate on X?
CME Group (@CMEGroup) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 711,945 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, CME Group sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CMEGroup have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CMEGroup post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going