Pys engagement report
@CFCPys - 716K followers on X
Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 716K followers, an engagement rate of 0.671%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 156K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #ad, #ucl.
Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #cfc, #ad, #ucl.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pys's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.671%, Pys sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 38% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 20265.3x their median
These guys are still at it after last night 😂😂 https://t.co/kto0lF1jsU
- Sep 9, 20264.9x their median
🚨 Barco: “I am ready to play in these games and I am ready to play in the Premier League as well. It’s physical and a tough league, but I am ready to fight in every game. I feel comfortable with the team and coach. (@ChelseaFC) https://t.co/fWKffKPX5f
- Sep 11, 20264.1x their median
🚨 🚨 BREAKING: Joao Pedro wins Premier League POTM. (@ChelseaFC) https://t.co/1HeJ0C91Kb
- Sep 9, 20263.3x their median
🚨 Chelsea’s first 5 under Alonso : ✅ Fulham - 3-2 ✅ Luton 2-0 ✅ Brighton 4-3 ❌ Arsenal 1-2 ✅ Leeds 6-3 ⚽️ Goals scored : 16 ⚽️ Goals conceded : 10 https://t.co/8a7VJa3UYe
- Aug 24, 20263.2x their median
Unbelievable performance tonight from Maxence Lacroix. Commanding, quick to the tackle, driving us forward on the ball. He made some really nice interceptions as well. Really enjoyed his display. https://t.co/57AgrogVid
- Sep 10, 20263.0x their median
🚨 Hull manager Sergej Jakirovic on how he plans to stop Joao Pedro, Palmer and Rogers on Saturday : “Kick them” (laughs)” (@SkySportsPL) “No, if you man mark you don’t have a chance, we will need to be together and compact”
- Sep 10, 20262.8x their median
🚨 Palmer said Alonso started calm but then got a bit angry at half time so they had to step it up in the second half. #CFC (Sky Sports Football on YT) https://t.co/plksAfUjVn
- Aug 24, 20262.7x their median
🚨 BREAKING: Chelsea are looking at four potential options should Enzo Fernandez leave : - Alex Scott - Adam Wharton - Manu Kone - Eduardo Camavinga (@JacobsBen @talkSPORT)
- Aug 24, 20262.6x their median
🚨 Internally at Chelsea there has been a recognition that they undervalued the importance of AURA when it came to hiring coaches. Rosenior and Potter could NOT stand the HEAT. (@guardian_sport) #CFC https://t.co/0tqbvKT0UU
- Sep 11, 20262.6x their median
🚨 👀 At least 2 other players have verbally agreed new deals. Further announcements will be made down the line. (@Matt_Law_DT) #CFC
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 716K followers, an engagement rate of 0.671%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 156K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #ad, #ucl.
- What is Pys's engagement rate on X?
- Pys (@CFCPys) has an engagement rate of 0.671%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 716,022 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.671%, Pys sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CFCPys have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CFCPys post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.