CFCDaily engagement report
@CFCDaily - 805K followers on X
Measured over 116 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 805K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 116 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 116 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 66K interactions, about 47x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #asm, #carabaocup.
Measured over 116 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #cfc, #asm, #carabaocup.
Compared with accounts its own size
CFCDaily's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.176%, CFCDaily sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 37% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 37% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 132 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202647x their median
🚨🇺🇦 Mykhaylo Mudryk set to leave Chelsea before the Deadline, loan deal being discussed. Leeds United insisting for days but there could be surpises based on opportunities. Mudryk wants to stay in Premier League. https://t.co/ASe4TXsIeN
- Aug 30, 202629x their median
É sempre especial voltar a Stamford Bridge. Hoje, dando continuidade ao trabalho da CBF no Chelsea x Brighton e compartilhando a jornada com Thomas Tuchel, Roberto Di Matteo e Paul Clement. https://t.co/de5TcwVUfZ
- Sep 24, 202617x their median
🚨Rogers on Messi/Ronaldo debate: “Ronaldo was my personal favourite, but, I played Messi in that World Cup semi-final, he’s 39, I couldn’t believe, I can’t imagine what he was like in his prime. I can imagine him in his prime being absolutely nothing you can do, like it’s impossible. But it was borderline nothing you could do in that game and he’s 39!” [CFC +]
- Aug 21, 202613x their median
The Faces of Chelsea on the new Sky Intro 🔵🤩 https://t.co/imKjoK0Tf0
- Aug 30, 202612x their median
🚨Lavia: “It’s not the best looking goal but I’ll take it.” [chelseafc] https://t.co/Oo3ecrbmn7
- Aug 22, 20267.7x their median
❗️David Ornstein believes Chelsea are the closest challengers to Arsenal: “Without European football and the quality of their recruitment I’m going to go left field and say Chelsea.” [TNT] https://t.co/ETpzecUAtF
- Aug 30, 20267.1x their median
❗️Emi Martinez on Instagram https://t.co/Gvg1azG2z5
- Sep 25, 20266.7x their median
Does that mean the Hazard panenka at Wembley in 2019 and Kepa refusing to leave the pitch is now a trophy? 🏆
- Aug 23, 20266.4x their median
Which PL ‘curse’ do you want to overcome the most this season? • No win at Old Trafford since 2013 • No win at Emirates since 2021 • No win at Anfield since 2021 • No win at Etihad since 2021
- Aug 30, 20265.9x their median
🚨Joao Pedro: “We should be more consistent and not give the opponents energy.” [MOTD] 🔵❗️
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 805K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 116 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 116 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 66K interactions, about 47x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #asm, #carabaocup.
- What is CFCDaily's engagement rate on X?
- CFCDaily (@CFCDaily) has an engagement rate of 0.176%, based on the median interactions across 116 original posts from the last 30 days against 805,041 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.176%, CFCDaily sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CFCDaily have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CFCDaily post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.2 posts per day across the measured window.