Back to @CD9's profile

6ᗡƆ engagement report

@CD9 - 2.3M followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 2.3M followers
Per impression
3.67%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
0.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
765
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 765 interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 3.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.926% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cd9, #parallax.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #cd9, #parallax.

Compared with accounts its own size

6ᗡƆ's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, 6ᗡƆ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 131 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 202637x their median

    Somos este equipo, somos los millones que integran al país, somos los que sueñan con lograr el objetivo, somos los que alientan con todo el corazón.. Somos más de 26, #SomosMéxico. 💚🤍❤️ https://t.co/dUgdHFuw5c

    24K3.4K698171331K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202612x their median

    ¿y si sí? ¿y por qué no? 🇲🇽 ¡VAMOS MÉXICO! @miseleccionmx https://t.co/1Mur2HGWEN

    7.4K1.5K815596K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20263.5x their median

    VENGA MÉXICO CARAJOOOO POR FAVOOOOORSI SE PUEDE

    2.1K3971061033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.0x their median

    𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢.𝚜𝚢𝚗𝚌() https://t.co/o4EoirxFyg

    1.7K3711407256K viewsView on X
  • May 12, 2026

    ¿Cuál será el siguiente destino de 𝑶𝒕𝒓𝒂 𝑽𝒆𝒛: 𝑬𝒍 𝑬𝒏𝒄𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒐? (comenta tu ciudad)

    1.3K1116171121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.6x their median

    [𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗔𝗫] 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗖𝗗𝗠𝗫 𝟤𝟢 𝖭𝖮𝖵 @ArenaCdMexico 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗬 𝟤𝟩 𝖭𝖮𝖵 @ArenaMtyOficial 𝗚𝗨𝗔𝗗𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗝𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝟢𝟦 𝖣𝖨𝖢 @ArenaGdlMx 𝚢𝚘𝚞.𝚌𝚊𝚗.𝚜𝚎𝚎.𝚒𝚝.𝚗𝚘𝚠() 💎💎💎 https://t.co/oTFfjRxKQt

    1.4K30614611555K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.6x their median

    ESTAMOS MUY EMOCIONADOS POR COMENZAR ESTA NUEVA ERA DE CD9… Y NO IMAGINAMOS VIVIRLA DE OTRA FORMA QUE NO SEA CON USTEDES. GRACIAS POR QUERERNOS TANTO. ALAN, ALONG Y JOS.

    1.6K2581082626K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.5x their median

    https://t.co/hz7oE3zxBr https://t.co/s2gUaAlWwS

    1.4K1942005866K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.4x their median

    ◆ : // https://t.co/Tkwr4mmG2E

    1.4K278823328K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.1x their median

    Tenemos algo que contarte. Conéctate mañana por Facebook o Instagram. 📅 01 de julio 🕛 12:00 PM https://t.co/x3WBfwPkx7

    1.2K1851663230K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cd9#parallax

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 765 interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 3.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.926% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cd9, #parallax.

What is 6ᗡƆ's engagement rate on X?
6ᗡƆ (@CD9) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,251,096 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, 6ᗡƆ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CD9 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CD9 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going