Back to @BuzzPatterson's profile

Buzz Patterson engagement report

@BuzzPatterson - 596K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.17%
of 596K followers
Per impression
4.51%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
3.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.071%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.2/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 596K followers, an engagement rate of 0.17%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 4.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 86x its own typical post.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #isaias.

Compared with accounts its own size

Buzz Patterson's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.17%, Buzz Patterson sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 320 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202686x their median

    Don Jr needed a Russian oligarch, two islands, and a fireworks show. I got married on the rooftop of an apartment building in West Hollywood. It was so much cooler. https://t.co/kkAIh0Tp7G

    60K2.9K23K1.2K11M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202650x their median

    The pro-lifers are livestreaming a public execution.

    43K6.3K1.6K256882K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202636x their median

    It’s a crazy party here. Everyone has been tailgating since the morning. Everwhere you go you see these tents with people drinking and having a BBQ. We should introduce this in Germany before games as well! https://t.co/FVtZhqcaD0

    34K99063487743K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202625x their median

    Meet Miguel Rojas. He studied all 100 citizenship questions. He wanted no special treatment because he’s a professional baseball player. And when he passed, he said he was prouder of that perfect score than his World Series home run. What stood out to me most was his gratitude. He talked about America opening its doors to him 21 years ago and said he’s never taken that opportunity for granted. Preparation. Respect for the process. Gratitude for the country that gave you an opportunity. Wanting to contribute and be judged by your character, not your status.

    22K3.1K384255876K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202621x their median

    Pete Hegseth wants to turn an execution into a public spectacle for Americans and the world to watch. He dishonors both our nation and the position he holds. He is beyond unfit to lead the brave men and women of our Armed Forces. He must go.

    8.4K1.4K11K633421K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202620x their median

    The idea of executions being live-streamed is absolutely sick and disgusting. You don’t hate Pete Hegseth enough

    16K2.0K2.9K165217K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202620x their median

    Patricia Heaton says Hollywood became so politically one-sided that she helped build a private network for people to meet in secret just to speak freely... https://t.co/sU5rxhrdpI

    17K2.6K327159815K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202619x their median

    Scott Bessent is running circles around Carney. And it’s brilliant to observe! Hopefully, Canadians will agree and get onboard! BESSENT: “Canada had a great military. They were right there at the forefront on the beaches of D-Day, and what the Canadian government has done to the Canadian Armed Forces, if you look at the ranks of NATO spending, they are near the very BOTTOM, like they're cellar dwellers around with Spain in terms of their military spending to GDP!” “And why is that? Because they were free riding.” “The Canadian businesses are not with the Prime Minister, the Canadian military is not with the Prime Minister.” And I don’t think the Canadian people are either. It doesn’t have to be like this. 🇺🇸🇨🇦 https://t.co/2Y6pXjOxlI

    16K3.0K52059254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202618x their median

    Today, I’ll cast my first Senate vote since I took a bad fall back in June. I’m really looking forward to being back on the Senate floor and seeing my colleagues. My recovery has been a long and often frustrating process, and the lingering effects of childhood polio haven’t made it any easier. I’m still not quite back to 100%, but I’ve assured Leader Thune that, as I continue with physical therapy on the advice of my doctors, I will do my best to be present for tough votes when our Conference needs me. Elaine and I are very grateful for all the continued well wishes from our fellow Kentuckians, and I’m glad to get back to more of business as usual on their behalf this month.

    4.2K57912K1.6K3.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202617x their median

    In America you can watch a firing squad, but can't watch Stephen Colbert. https://t.co/4TIo2GqTEb

    13K2.8K1.6K157124K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#isaias

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 596K followers, an engagement rate of 0.17%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 4.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 86x its own typical post.

What is Buzz Patterson's engagement rate on X?
Buzz Patterson (@BuzzPatterson) has an engagement rate of 0.17%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 596,219 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.17%, Buzz Patterson sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BuzzPatterson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BuzzPatterson post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going