Back to @BuzzPatterson's profile

Buzz Patterson engagement report

@BuzzPatterson - 588K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.267%
of 588K followers
Per impression
4.60%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
5.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.067%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 588K followers, an engagement rate of 0.267%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 4.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Buzz Patterson's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.267%, Buzz Patterson sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202611x their median

    Patricia Heaton says Hollywood became so politically one-sided that she helped build a private network for people to meet in secret just to speak freely... https://t.co/sU5rxhrdpI

    15K2.4K269130550K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202611x their median

    Joe Biden just told an audience the he “closed the border.” What a sick, demented, senile, psychopath! https://t.co/bnrERZyr6x

    13K2.3K1.1K165123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202610x their median

    BREAKING: US Air Force Major Jason Watson facing 10 charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice after he called for President Trump to be REMOVED while in uniform at the Capitol Dude is about to FAFO so hard https://t.co/7ZKGL8zZHU

    13K1.8K884142302K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.7x their median

    This freak, who calls himself a “doctor,” equates child sex change surgery with circumcision. He has no answers for anything. It was incredibly insightful…in a way that his campaign is over. https://t.co/VYEGPmOUU2

    5.8K1.3K1972237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.7x their median

    🚨🚨@RCPolitics EXCLUSIVE and BREAKING: Three Secret Service officials/agents were walked out of their offices on Monday and made "do not admits" as part of a criminal investigation into leaked classified information to the media, according to two sources familiar with the matter. It's unclear if the leaks to the media pertained to the controversy over President Trump's secret evacuation from Turkey because of intelligence about a surface-to-air missile threat to Air Force One from Iran. The FBI and the CIA are involved in the investigation, one source told RCP. Calls to Secret Service Communications Director Anthony Guglielmi were not immediately returned. An email to the Secret Service press office also was not immediately returned. DEVELOPING...

    4.3K1.4K11672397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.9x their median

    Don’t let our media see this! We’re forcing our sailors and their families to watch screenings of Top Gun on the deck of the USS Midway in San Diego. Brutal living conditions. How masculine. What is our @DeptofWar doing? 🤣 https://t.co/uNqqzODeAz

    4.0K570921431K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    Hey, @JetBlue. Really? https://t.co/hNzb5cAcY6

    3.2K1.0K2363957K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.4x their median

    I think I need to start a petition to be invited on the @Gutfeldfox show. He’s missing me and he needs me. 😎 Whaddya think? https://t.co/RbIVyHjzJH

    3.2K29029030187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.4x their median

    Nichole and I moved out of California for a variety of reasons. One, was the cost of living. We just got our first Nevada Power bill. $32.00 We were averaging $350 a month in CA. https://t.co/h7QuA903Ro

    3.1K4022411955K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.8x their median

    HILLARY CLINTON: MY STORY As some of you know, I was the Air Force Military Aide for Bill Clinton, lived in the White House, traveled everywhere they traveled, and carried the “nuclear football.” As such, I was always in close proximity to both Bill and Hill. Among the military who served in the White House and the professional White House staff, the Clinton administration was infamously known for its lack of professionalism and courtesy, though few ever spoke about it. But when it came to rudeness, it was Hillary Clinton who was the most feared person in the administration. She set the tone. From the very first day in my assignment. When I first arrived to work in the White House, my predecessor warned me. “You can get away with pissing off Bill but if you make her mad, she’ll rip your heart out.” I heeded those words. I did make him mad a few times, but I never really pissed her off. I knew the ramifications. I learned very quickly that the administration’s day-to-day character, whether inside or outside of DC, depended solely on the presence or absence of Hillary. Her reputation preceded her. We used to say that when Hillary was gone, it was a frat party. When she was home, it was “Schindler’s List.” In my first few days on the job, and remember I essentially lived there, I realized there were different rules for Hillary. She instructed the senior staff, including me, that she didn’t want to be forced to encounter us. We were instructed that “whenever Mrs. Clinton is moving through the halls, be as inconspicuous as possible.” She did not want to see “staff” and be forced to “interact” with anyone. No matter their position in the building. Many a time, I’d see mature, professional adults, working in the most important building in the world, scurrying into office doorways to escape Hillary’s line of sight. I’d hear whispering, “She’s coming, she’s coming!” I could be walking down a West Wing hallway, midday, busier than hell, people doing the administration’s work whether in the press office, medical unit, wherever. She’d walk in and they’d scatter. She was the Nazi schoolmarm and the rest of us were expected to hide as though we were kids in trouble. I wasn’t a kid, I was a professional officer and pilot. I said “I’m not doing that.” There was also a period of time when she attempted to ban military uniforms in the White House. It was the reelection year of 1996, and she was trying to craft the narrative that the military was not a priority in the Clinton administration. As a military aide, carrying the football, and working closely with the Secret Service, I objected to that. It simply wasn’t a matter of her political agenda; it was national security. If the balloon went up, the Secret Service would need to find me as quickly as possible. Seconds matter. Finding the aide in military uniform made complete sense. Besides, what commander in chief wouldn’t want to advertise his leadership and command? She finally relented because the Secret Service weighed in. The Clintons are corrupt beyond words. Hillary is evil, vindictive, and profane. Hillary is a bitch.

    2.2K515932260K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 588K followers, an engagement rate of 0.267%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 4.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Buzz Patterson's engagement rate on X?
Buzz Patterson (@BuzzPatterson) has an engagement rate of 0.267%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 588,362 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.267%, Buzz Patterson sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BuzzPatterson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BuzzPatterson post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going