Back to @BusyDrT's profile

Dr Sherri Tenpenny engagement report

@BusyDrT - 228K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 228K followers
Per impression
1.55%
6.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
103
interactions (median)
Saved
0.256%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 228K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #flock.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr Sherri Tenpenny's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, Dr Sherri Tenpenny sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link89% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 314 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202661x their median

    Reminder: The only safe and effective vaccine out there is the one you don’t take!

    5.0K9502174978K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202653x their median

    What was the FDA thinking by approving the new Moderna mRNA flu vax? Over 100 deaths and ~75% adverse events? Does this sound safe to you? I talked about in this week's Morning Coffee. Watch here: https://t.co/I8KQ71zV7b Nic Hulscher's epidemiology team just reanalyzed the FDA’s own data used to approve mFLUSIVA. Here's what they found. To prevent just ONE influenza hospitalization, 5,017 people had to be vaccinated at the COST of: ~2 excess unexplained DEATHS ~278 disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions ~3,798 adverse reactions Compared with the standard-dose flu vaccine, that amounts to approximately 1,454 ADDITIONAL adverse reactions and 233 ADDITIONAL disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions for every hospitalization prevented. Unexplained deaths were 2.55× more frequent among mFLUSIVA recipients, while disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions were 6.15× more frequent than with the standard-dose flu vaccine. Literally EVERY SINGLE solicited adverse event was more frequent in the mFLUSIVA group. Neither pivotal trial included a placebo arm, and no influenza-mortality endpoint was ever measured. Moreover, mFLUSIVA commits recipients to annual lifelong exposure to nucleoside-modified mRNA technology despite evidence of residual DNA contamination, genomic integration, protein misfolding, proteostatic collapse, body-wide biodistribution, years-long persistence, and compounded biological injury with repeated dosing. Our study and accompanying information were sent directly to Secretary Kennedy and officials at HHS, FDA, CDC, and NIH. We hope Secretary Kennedy and federal health officials make the life-saving decision to remove this extremely hazardous product from the market before widespread administration begins. In light of the evidence now before them, allowing mFLUSIVA to remain approved would be a grave mistake.

    3.3K1.9K13410442K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202650x their median

    I’ve seen WAY too many posts lately promoting vaccines for infants — and now the annual push for everyone to roll up their sleeves for the flu shot — and quite frankly, it makes me sick. So I’m just going to leave this right here. I hope this video reaches every parent, every grandparent, every pregnant woman, and every person who still believes we should blindly trust what we’ve been told. They labeled me one of the “Disinformation Dozen” for questioning the narrative and refusing to stay silent. We are the people who kept asking questions when we were told to stop asking. We kept reading. We kept researching. We kept speaking when they wanted us silent. Memorize this and share with your loved ones.

    3.4K1.6K744240K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202650x their median

    THE VITAMIN K SHOT IS NOT A VITAMIN. It’s a pharmaceutical injection containing synthetic vitamin K and a solution of other ingredients. Yet one word — “vitamin” — has made generations of parents believe they’re simply giving their newborn something healthy. The data I cite raises an even bigger question: chronic illness was reported at 2.64% with no exposures, 11.7% with Vitamin K alone, and as high as 30% when Vitamin K was combined with maternal vaccination. Those numbers deserve scrutiny. That word changes the perception, but it does not change what’s in the syringe.

    3.3K1.7K644349K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202645x their median

    🚨 New CDC Data this month shows DTaP Vaccination rates amongst school children are collapsing as a record number of Parents are applying for exemptions Parents are listening! Keep fighting! No more vaccines! Just a reminder— The DTaP vaccine is an “updated” version of the DTP vaccine we give to American children today. Listen to what Bill Gates did with The DTP Vaccine involving The Mass Genocide of girls in Africa. “The most popular vaccine in the world is the the DTP vaccine. We got rid of it in this country because it was causing severe brain injuries or death, 1 in every 300 children…. We used it in the 80’s and that’s why there was all this litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act, that then gave them immunity from liability… In Europe they don’t use it, in America they don’t use it, but they give it to 161 million African children every year.” Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved 30 million lives. The Danish government said, Show isis the Data. Bill Gates wasn’t able to. The Danish Government went to Africa and did their own studies and they looked at 30 years of DTP data and what they found shocked them all. They found that African girls who got the DTP were dying at 10x the rate of unvaccinated girls. They were dying of things that nobody had ever associated with the DTP vaccine. They were dying of anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia. Nobody noticed for 30 years that it was the vaccinated girls and not the unvaccinated girls that were dying. What happened was these girls were not dying of Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis… the vaccine protected them against those, but it RUINED their immune systems. They were unable to defend themselves against minor diseases that other children with hearty immune systems were able to fend off.…” That DTP vaccine is still given to children in poorer countries worldwide. This Clip https://t.co/p2SNoYX9hR

    3.4K1.1K374690K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202637x their median

    Measles is not Ebola. Write that down. People have been made absolutely terrified of a disease that, long before the MMR was introduced, was not treated like the deadly catastrophe it’s made out to be today. Go back. Look at the history. Look at the original documents. Stop letting fear tell the story.

    2.7K9301314387K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202625x their median

    Newborns aren’t born defective. Our bodies were designed with intention. When a baby enters the world, up to a third of their total blood volume and precious stem cells remain in the placenta, waiting to naturally transfer back and help repair the microscopic physical stress of delivery. Before agreeing to routine newborn procedures, from delayed cord clamping decisions to the standard vitamin K injection—take the time to do your homework, look at the ingredients, and understand the physiology. Educate before you vaccinate: https://t.co/YkUK15U0GC

    1.8K660252322K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 202619x their median

    🚨WARNING: The "Vitamin K" shot for newborns? It's NOT natural Vitamin K from food—it's a SYNTHETIC Chemical Toxin with the FDA's HARDEST Black Box Warning for Fatal Reactions. From the OFFICIAL Pfizer PACKAGE INSERT—here's the ugly truth they DON'T tell you at the hospital: 🧪 INGREDIENTS: A Toxic Brew for Tiny Bodies - Synthetic Phytonadione (Vit K1): Lab-made chemical, NOT the bioavailable nutrient in greens or K2 supps. Forces blood to clot 9,000X faster—turning it to "sludge" & halting natural stem cell repair post-birth. - Polysorbate 80 (70 mg/mL): 200X MORE than in Gardasil vaccine! Crosses blood-brain barrier, delivers aluminum to the brain, triggers anaphylaxis, heart issues, & hypersensitivity shocks. (Used in chemo to target tumors—WTF for babies?!) - Benzyl Alcohol (9 mg/mL preservative): Causes "Gasping Syndrome" in newborns—gasping breaths, CNS depression, metabolic acidosis, seizures, liver/kidney failure. Fatal in preemies! - Aluminum: Builds up to TOXIC levels, linked to brain damage & bone toxicity. Premature babies at highest risk. - Others: Phenol, propylene glycol, hydrochloric acid—no natural benefits, just risks. ⚠️ BLACK BOX WARNING: Strongest FDA Alert Short of a Ban - FATAL Reactions: Anaphylaxis, shock, liver failure, cardiac/respiratory arrest—can hit DURING or RIGHT AFTER the shot. Even on the FIRST dose! REPORTED ADVERSE EVENTS (Post-Marketing—from Insert) - DEATH & Near-Death: Cardiovascular collapse, bradycardia, cyanosis, hypersensitivity shocks. - Brain & Body Harm: Seizures, neurological deterioration, intracranial hemorrhage (the EXACT thing they claim to prevent!), SIDS links in studies. - Liver/Lung/Light Issues: Jaundice, hyperbilirubinemia, hemolysis (blood breakdown)—worse in preemies from overdose. - Skin Horror: Scleroderma-like patches, urticaria, delayed hypersensitivity (up to 1 YEAR later!). - Bonus Red Flag: Studies tie synthetic K1 to leukemia risk. Low newborn Vit K? It's BIOLOGY—not a "deficiency." Babies need thin blood for stem cell travel from cord blood post birth; 30% is still in the placenta & cord which needs to transfer to baby via non-coagulated blood. Vitamin K levels rise naturally by day 7. Nature designed birth this way—NOT for chemical intervention! Demand FULL informed consent. Say NO to this poison & protect your baby. If concern is still there, pregnant mom consuming plenty of nutrient dense vitamin K rich foods & a simple single drop of oral natural Vitamin K for baby post birth prevents any issues. This is how most other developed countries care for their pregnant moms & newborns. The US needs to stop the chemical assault on pregnant moms & babies.

    1.2K771343166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202618x their median

    I don’t even want to share this article because it doesn’t deserve the traffic. But you need to see what is STILL being published in 2026. I mean…what are we doing? COVID shots. Again. Are you kidding me? Confusing guidance? How is anyone still pretending this is normal? https://t.co/yZysW5IXwZ

    1.2K3451884416K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202611x their median

    A TikTok isn’t research. A reel isn’t evidence. And confidence doesn’t make someone an "expert." I’ve spent 26 years digging into vaccines, reading the studies, following the references, and asking the hard questions. Your health deserves more than an algorithm. Do the research and think for yourself. I’ve made it easier to go deeper. Read more here: https://t.co/yEZbFCTdEI

    85120230512K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#flock

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 228K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

What is Dr Sherri Tenpenny's engagement rate on X?
Dr Sherri Tenpenny (@BusyDrT) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 228,027 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, Dr Sherri Tenpenny sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BusyDrT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BusyDrT post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going