Back to @BuckSexton's profile

Buck Sexton engagement report

@BuckSexton - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.062%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.638%
129K views on a typical post
Reach
9.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
824
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
36 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.87/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 824 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 129K times each, and 0.638% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 75x its own typical post.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Buck Sexton's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.062%, Buck Sexton sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 3, 202675x their median

    This hits Bash so hard because it used to work. CNN could just say "the experts" and half the country nodded agreement. But Covid exposed them- and CNN- as such a joke, their old tricks now fail. Bravo RFK jr! https://t.co/fzPAj2lE66

    53K7.7K713130544K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202645x their median

    Imagine being so narcissistic and deluded that you'd say something like this in front of a crowd because you think it makes you sound wise and virtuous https://t.co/VEOuQ8RBxg

    28K3.4K5.2K5532.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202630x their median

    The problem isn't that Fauci didn't know for sure what vaxx risks were- it's that he claimed with absolute certainty that there were NO RISKS. He lied. It was monstrous. https://t.co/lL5UVWkiFY

    20K4.2K39461173K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202629x their median

    In a saner America, the strikingly beautiful blond woman standing for truth and defending all women against gender madness would be the most celebrated sports figure in the country https://t.co/sZhK7TUzKJ

    21K2.3K34939149K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202619x their median

    Those of us who said starting in 2020 that Fauci was a maniacal media whore who cared much more about being adored by tv journos than saving any actual lives from Covid apparently understated the case against him

    14K1.7K16327219K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202618x their median

    However disdainful you are of Fauci's megalomania and narcissism, it's not enough And whatever contempt you have for media figures who demanded the worship of Fauci, it's not enough

    13K1.8K2323899K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202616x their median

    To all of Twitter/X who truly believed Fauci, wore t shirts emblazoned with his face, etc: You're not as smart as you think you are. Not even close. "the science" was a scam. You were fooled. Now you should be apologizing profusely to everyone you told to mask up years ago

    11K1.7K31760123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202615x their median

    Lindsey Clancy's 3 murdered children were defenseless humans deserving full protection of the state. If she murdered 3 adults, would anyone cheer for her outside the courtroom? Would there be any "doubt" about her guilt? Leftism, abortion, it's all demonic, dehumanizes kids

    11K1.6K15121126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202612x their median

    Hard to imagine anyone being such a pandering coward they'd claim Karmelo Anthony-- who murdered a kid in front of dozens of eyewitnesses-- only got convicted because there wasn't a black person on the jury. But here's low-T Talarico saying just that https://t.co/4DcevwYkFf

    7.9K1.7K2665797K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202610x their median

    Hasan Piker crowd boos after he says America didn’t deserve 9/11 This is the Democratic Party. https://t.co/7KHhmpWHkj

    7.2K1.0K18950257K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 824 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 129K times each, and 0.638% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 75x its own typical post.

What is Buck Sexton's engagement rate on X?
Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) has an engagement rate of 0.062%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,319,322 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.062%, Buck Sexton sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BuckSexton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BuckSexton post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going