Back to @BruceGrannec's profile

Bruce Grannec engagement report

@BruceGrannec - 390K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 390K followers
Per impression
1.26%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
7.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
350
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 350 interactions against 390K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bruce Grannec's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Bruce Grannec sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202663x their median

    BRADLEY BARCOLA 🇫🇷 VA DEVENIR LA VENTE LA PLUS CHÈRE DE L’HISTOIRE DE LIGUE 1 VERS UN CLUB ÉTRANGER !!!!!!!!!! 🤑💰 115 M€ + 25 M€ BONUS !!!!!!!!!!! https://t.co/i8r7giyRQX

    21K8431151001.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202614x their median

    Le Real c'est dans la continuité des dernieres saisons, rien n'a changé. C'est qu'un match mais ca sent déjà le copier coller de la saison passée. Au-delà des limites de cet effectif, Arda qui sort car c'est plus simple de sortir lui plutôt que d'autres...

    4.6K23214733186K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202613x their median

    Kazuyoshi Miura (59 ans) a inscrit un doublé avec Fukushima United en Coupe de l’Empereur aujourd’hui. 🇯🇵⚽️ Il est l’un des footballeurs professionnels les plus âgés de l’histoire. 👴 https://t.co/YXFLgvALxz

    4.3K2315022223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    🚨 LE NOM DE DAVID BECKHAM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 REVIENT DANS LES DISCUSSIONS D’UN RACHAT DU FC NANTES ! 💛💚 Il fait parties d’un des projets de rachat du club. 🗞️ @OuestFrance https://t.co/QSWw1sufo0

    4.1K1693819431K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.9x their median

    Le Shark va tellement rouler sur la L1 facilement, encore un super coup du PSG. C'était très intelligent d'aller le chercher !

    2.4K47132225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.8x their median

    L'enchaînement CDM de Jude et le début de saison, c'est très fort !

    2.1K7915272110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.6x their median

    Wiloo a tellement raison le psg peut devenir la plus grande équipe de l’histoire devant le barca de guardiola Si on fait le 3 peat on va tout mélanger hein https://t.co/roMPor9r52

    1.9K1861151471.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.2x their median

    🦈🦈🦈 ça commence. Il va se régaler dans ce PSG !

    2.1K4014185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.2x their median

    Il est tellement fort Raphina, sacré début de saison !

    1.8K418024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.7x their median

    Facile pour Malik Fofana, il arrête le temps. La gestion parfaite de Fonseca et de l'OL autour des barrages de LDC, c'est très propre !

    1.6K369047K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 350 interactions against 390K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

What is Bruce Grannec's engagement rate on X?
Bruce Grannec (@BruceGrannec) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 389,737 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Bruce Grannec sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BruceGrannec have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BruceGrannec post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going