Brodie Smith engagement report
@Brodiesmith21 - 756K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 29 interactions against 756K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.146% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 247x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brodie Smith's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Brodie Smith sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 70% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 20% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 27, 2026247x their median
Accuracy in different fields is amazing of talented ones. https://t.co/K4J64nrD6p
- Jun 18, 20266.7x their median
One of the easiest nutrition tricks I use when looking for high protein foods: Take the grams of protein and add a zero. Example: • 20g protein = 200 • 15g protein = 150 • 10g protein = 100 Now compare that number to the calories per serving. If the protein number with a zero added is GREATER than the calories, it's generally a great source of protein. Examples: • 20g protein, 180 calories = Great protein source • 15g protein, 220 calories = Not as protein dense This isn't a perfect rule, but it's a quick way to spot foods that give you a lot of protein for relatively few calories when you're shopping. Check out the nutrition labels in the photos and see which ones pass the test! Most people look at calories first. I look at protein efficiency first.
- Aug 29, 20266.6x their median
Rainers Balodis put up an INSANE 1088-rated round on Moving Day and will have a THREE-STROKE LEAD heading into Championship Sunday 🤯 https://t.co/l1zA8J0mIG
- Jun 18, 20265.2x their median
If you told me 10 years ago I would be competing for a World Championship with a bald spot, I’d say you’re crazy. But here we are. Full Send! https://t.co/UfVxAqJsSs
- Sep 11, 20265.0x their median
One of the greatest investments you can make is in your health. Let’s get after it! https://t.co/ZBSgoRzowb
- Aug 30, 20265.0x their median
This has to be AI right? https://t.co/g1Up2m7NMH
- Jul 4, 20264.9x their median
Masters World Championship – 3rd Place 🥉 What a week in England. Huge thanks to everyone on Wolly Mammoth for giving me the opportunity to play ultimate frisbee again after 10 years. I honestly never thought I’d play again, let alone at a World Championship. This week you guys made something very clear. Yes I love ultimate frisbee, I love throwing hammer goals and getting layout D’s, but what I missed most was being part of a team. Having a group of guys all buying into one goal and pushing each other to achieve it. Being part of this team showed me what I’ve been missing and I look forward to playing again with you all. As for what’s next… Overall, I’m happy with how my body held up. I avoided any major injuries, and during our quarterfinal I finally started to feel a little like my old self again. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to play in the Semifinals against Clapham (body just had enough) and that sucked, but I’ll use that for fuel moving forward. I’m going all in on training for ultimate over the next 4–5 months to see what I’m capable of. If you’ve followed me for a while, you know I’m going to give it everything I’ve got. If I can squeeze a few more great years out of this sport, that’ll be a dream come true. Thanks to everyone who supported us throughout the tournament, and to everyone I met at the tournament. The positive messages, conversations, and support meant more than you know. BRODIESMITH21 IS BACK!
- Aug 8, 20264.3x their median
How to lose fat - Calorie deficit How to gain muscle - Lift heavy and progressive overload Do these 2 things and watch how it changes your life https://t.co/c3cimgJzOk
- Aug 8, 20264.1x their median
Max out your 401k and Roth IRA every year. Your future self will thank you.
- Aug 13, 20263.8x their median
We’re running our first marathon together in Chicago on October 11th, but we wanted to make those 26.2 miles about more than just us. We have 3 corgis of our own Lance, Zero & Moose and we believe every dog deserves a chance to find a loving home. So we’re raising $2,200 for PAWS Chicago. We’re already halfway there, and this is the last week to donate. If you’d like to help us get to the finish line, we’d really appreciate it. Every bit helps. Donate here: https://t.co/heFBlL9unj 26.2 miles for a pretty good reason. 🐾 #ChicagoMarathon #PAWSChicago
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 29 interactions against 756K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.146% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 247x its own typical post.
- What is Brodie Smith's engagement rate on X?
- Brodie Smith (@Brodiesmith21) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 755,966 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Brodie Smith sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Brodiesmith21 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Brodiesmith21 post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.