Back to @Brodiesmith21's profile

Brodie Smith engagement report

@Brodiesmith21 - 758K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 758K followers
Per impression
0.351%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
2.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
71
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 758K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.351% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 102x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brodie Smith's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Brodie Smith sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 27, 2026102x their median

    Accuracy in different fields is amazing of talented ones. https://t.co/K4J64nrD6p

    6.7K39495123.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20262.7x their median

    One of the easiest nutrition tricks I use when looking for high protein foods: Take the grams of protein and add a zero. Example: • 20g protein = 200 • 15g protein = 150 • 10g protein = 100 Now compare that number to the calories per serving. If the protein number with a zero added is GREATER than the calories, it's generally a great source of protein. Examples: • 20g protein, 180 calories = Great protein source • 15g protein, 220 calories = Not as protein dense This isn't a perfect rule, but it's a quick way to spot foods that give you a lot of protein for relatively few calories when you're shopping. Check out the nutrition labels in the photos and see which ones pass the test! Most people look at calories first. I look at protein efficiency first.

    18256077K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    Rainers Balodis put up an INSANE 1088-rated round on Moving Day and will have a THREE-STROKE LEAD heading into Championship Sunday 🤯 https://t.co/l1zA8J0mIG

    17746329K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20262.2x their median

    If you told me 10 years ago I would be competing for a World Championship with a bald spot, I’d say you’re crazy. But here we are. Full Send! https://t.co/UfVxAqJsSs

    132614149K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20262.0x their median

    Masters World Championship – 3rd Place 🥉 What a week in England. Huge thanks to everyone on Wolly Mammoth for giving me the opportunity to play ultimate frisbee again after 10 years. I honestly never thought I’d play again, let alone at a World Championship. This week you guys made something very clear. Yes I love ultimate frisbee, I love throwing hammer goals and getting layout D’s, but what I missed most was being part of a team. Having a group of guys all buying into one goal and pushing each other to achieve it. Being part of this team showed me what I’ve been missing and I look forward to playing again with you all. As for what’s next… Overall, I’m happy with how my body held up. I avoided any major injuries, and during our quarterfinal I finally started to feel a little like my old self again. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to play in the Semifinals against Clapham (body just had enough) and that sucked, but I’ll use that for fuel moving forward. I’m going all in on training for ultimate over the next 4–5 months to see what I’m capable of. If you’ve followed me for a while, you know I’m going to give it everything I’ve got. If I can squeeze a few more great years out of this sport, that’ll be a dream come true. Thanks to everyone who supported us throughout the tournament, and to everyone I met at the tournament. The positive messages, conversations, and support meant more than you know. BRODIESMITH21 IS BACK!

    1288708.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.9x their median

    This has to be AI right? https://t.co/g1Up2m7NMH

    111320021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.8x their median

    How to lose fat - Calorie deficit How to gain muscle - Lift heavy and progressive overload Do these 2 things and watch how it changes your life https://t.co/c3cimgJzOk

    12023027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.7x their median

    Max out your 401k and Roth IRA every year. Your future self will thank you.

    101314150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.5x their median

    We’re running our first marathon together in Chicago on October 11th, but we wanted to make those 26.2 miles about more than just us. We have 3 corgis of our own Lance, Zero & Moose and we believe every dog deserves a chance to find a loving home. So we’re raising $2,200 for PAWS Chicago. We’re already halfway there, and this is the last week to donate. If you’d like to help us get to the finish line, we’d really appreciate it. Every bit helps. Donate here: https://t.co/heFBlL9unj 26.2 miles for a pretty good reason. 🐾 #ChicagoMarathon #PAWSChicago

    91162127K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 2026

    My favorite way to end a throwing session https://t.co/DzeGWvruvr

    9804015K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 758K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.351% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 102x its own typical post.

What is Brodie Smith's engagement rate on X?
Brodie Smith (@Brodiesmith21) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 757,985 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Brodie Smith sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Brodiesmith21 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Brodiesmith21 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going