Jimmy Corsetti engagement report
@BrightInsight6 - 221K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 221K followers, an engagement rate of 0.768%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 68K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 35% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jimmy Corsetti's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.768%, Jimmy Corsetti sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 95% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 447 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 28, 202613x their median
Plato told us that ATLANTIS was destroyed by a flood in a single day and night, and became an impassable barrier of mudā¦ The horrific flood disaster in Napal has truly illustrated that a catastrophic force of water has the power to erase everything from a civilization. Meanwhile, virtually every ancient civilization spanning five continents around the world share legends of a great flood that destroyed those before themā¦because it happened š Video created by @vantortech
- Aug 12, 20268.4x their median
Extinct human remains found on seafloor fuel claims of real-life biblical giants
- Sep 24, 20266.1x their median
Genesis 8:4: āā¦the Ark came to rest on the mountains of Araratā¦ā I think now is a good time to revisit the 439 YEAR OLD MAP which shows NOAHās ARK on the mountains of Ararat, located in modern day Turkey Urbano Monte, circa 1587 šŗļøšš» https://t.co/7UvMAA7jwh
- Sep 26, 20265.9x their median
āEven if the Durupinar site is proven to be an ancient boat, it doesnāt mean itās Noahās Arkā Actually it would. Itās virtually the exact length, AND in the same location it was described. A large vessel ~6,500ft up on the Mountains of Ararat would undoubtedly be Noahās Ark. What else would it be?
- Aug 23, 20265.7x their median
NOAHāS ARK UPDATE: New testing underway at Mount Araratās āDurupinar Formationā, which is virtually the exact LENGTH & LOCATION described in the Bible! If/when confirmed, it may ALSO change everything we knew about GOBEKLI TEPE, as āNoahās Altarā described in Genesis 8:20 has striking similarities to the Biblical depiction of the altar. Could Gobekli Tepe be the Altar that Noah built after emerging from the Great Flood? https://t.co/rWfrkyuNS0
- Aug 13, 20265.6x their median
NEVER BEFORE SEEN RUINS FINALLY EXCAVATED! Today is a massive victory to all āconspiracy theorists & pseudo-archaeologistsā who rightfully called out the Olive Trees that were planted on top of ancient ruins at GOBEKLI TEPE As a result of the global backlash, authorities in Turkey have initiated excavations on the North side of the hill. Yet a significant % still awaits excavation This is a great first step in the right direction, which is literally decades overdue Now we wait and see to what extent the roots (of the nearly 1,000 olive trees) have done to damage the ruins that layer buried all this timeā¦
- Aug 30, 20263.8x their median
What you need to know about the winged-bulls of ancient Iraq that were destroyed by ISISā¦ ISIS = Mercenaries. They were paid to do this. But who orchestrated this and why? A must watchšš» https://t.co/22k1KOG9kM
- Sep 4, 20263.1x their median
A few thousand years from now Archaeologists will stumble upon the Hoover Dam and say it was an ancient āreligious templeā Then, theyāll ridicule those who suggest it was a lost technology, kinda like they did to the Great Pyramid https://t.co/WBIpDFbWA0
- Sep 27, 20262.9x their median
āThe Durupinar site is NOT Noahās Ark. It was studied and debunked decades agoā No, it hasnāt been debunked. The 1987 study of ~40yrs ago isnāt even remotely comparable: š1987: Analog GPR, and only 4-core samples collected, all under 10 meters š2026: Military-grade 3D Radar, Multi-channel ERT, LiDAR/Thermal drones, 1,000 soil samples collected, and several dozen more pending core-drill samples that will reach depths of up to 100 meters! All of this is exponentially larger in scale, and with technology that is far more advanced. Itās also being done under University Permits for the first time. The 2026 study is ongoing, and results arenāt even in yet. So how exactly has this been debunked?? š§
- Sep 7, 20262.7x their median
šØDECLASSIFIED Epstein emails reveal he had sought to meet with legendary ancient astronaut theorist, Zecharia Sitchin, famous for proposing that Humans were created by the āAnunnakiā Hmmā¦thereās something about this that brings more validity to Sitchins work, imo. Iāve said it before and Iāll it again: Many of the worlds richest and most powerful people are deeply interested in the mysteries of lost ancient civilizations. But why? š¤
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 221K followers, an engagement rate of 0.768%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 68K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 35% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
- What is Jimmy Corsetti's engagement rate on X?
- Jimmy Corsetti (@BrightInsight6) has an engagement rate of 0.768%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 221,438 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.768%, Jimmy Corsetti sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BrightInsight6 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BrightInsight6 post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.