Brian Chovanec engagement report
@Brian_Chovanec - 94K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 961 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 63.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 39x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iasen, #txgov, #txsen.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #iasen, #txgov, #txsen.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brian Chovanec's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.02%, Brian Chovanec sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.697% to 2.61%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 41% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 12% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 20, 202639x their median
The 90s were awesome. “John, we need a theme song for NBA basketball.” “Got it. How big?” “Full orchestra. French horns. Strings. Timpani. The fate of Western civilization hangs in the balance.” “Say no more.” https://t.co/14SaPrwmHM
- Aug 25, 202624x their median
El-Sayed: I feel really good about being able to beat Mike Rogers who we both agree is a beta. Watters: *laughs* Didn’t agree to that. El-Sayed: But you laughed because you actually agree. https://t.co/mojar1dKjy
- Mar 9, 201823x their median
I am going to retweet this tweet on August 19th, 2026.
- Sep 13, 202612x their median
it’s over. fire everyone. send the o line into the sun. throw the refs in jail.
- Aug 16, 20266.0x their median
Hakeem Jeffries has got to go. He is not going to be a leader of anything if Democrats win and we have free and fair elections.
- Sep 16, 20265.1x their median
I have seen more organised backlash from the pro-Palestine movement towards Ed Sheeran than I have EVER seen towards Donald Trump
- Sep 16, 20264.3x their median
Can someone explain to me what Ed Sheeran has done wrong? From what I understand, other acts on his tour expressed opinions about Palestine, an owner prevented them from performing in his stadium, Sheeran expressed support for the other performers’ right to free speech while himself declining to comment further on the issue that they are protesting. And now many people seem mad Ed Sheeran, for either 1) supposedly causing the other performers to be dropped from his show (which I think is not at all what happened) or 2) for not joining their protest, which is his right to not do. It seems to me that he hasn’t done anything wrong, he’s just caught up in something swirling around him that he did not cause nor escalate, but now he’s being made out to be the bad guy. Why? Do I have any of the facts wrong here?
- Aug 24, 20263.7x their median
My daughter's tuition bill just arrived: $4,400 for the semester at UNC. Last year, it was $44,000 at a different school. Same kid. Same major. Ten times the price. She started at a private college out of state. Great school. But the department she cared about wasn't especially strong. The flights were miserable. Every semester cost as much as a new car. And she was homesick. This year she transferred to UNC, which she'd originally gotten into and turned down. (Because what 18-year-old picks the school Dad wants?) In-state tuition at one of the best public universities in the country turns out to be less than a lot of families spend on summer camp. A friend put it well: one of the best things about North Carolina is that there's a college for almost anyone willing to put in the work. From essentially open-enrollment schools to UNC and Duke, you can find it without leaving the state. Like most parents, I figured the price tag said something about the quality. Then I watched my own kid find an equal or better education for one-tenth the cost, 20 minutes from home.
- Aug 18, 20263.3x their median
It took Milwaukee 5 hours to report 180K votes. Florida has reported 2.5 million votes in an hour. Don't Milwaukee my Wisconsin.
- Aug 21, 2026
You cannot watch this only one time. You just can’t. https://t.co/BJwNiKzBp7
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 961 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 63.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 39x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iasen, #txgov, #txsen.
- What is Brian Chovanec's engagement rate on X?
- Brian Chovanec (@Brian_Chovanec) has an engagement rate of 1.02%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 94,172 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.02%, Brian Chovanec sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Brian_Chovanec have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Brian_Chovanec post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.