Back to @BrettFromDJ's profile

Brett engagement report

@BrettFromDJ - 171K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.399%
of 171K followers
Per impression
1.21%
57K views on a typical post
Reach
33.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
683
interactions (median)
Saved
0.279%
158 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 683 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.399%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brett's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.399%, Brett sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 322 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 19, 202512x their median

    Experimenting with liquid metal. https://t.co/SmffQeUbP3

    7.5K276244731.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.2x their median

    This company is crazy. After spending $68,000 on my body, they rented me a car to drive to the Hyrox venue. My transformation into a billboard is now complete. Higgsfield also gave me $30,000 in API credits to make marketing videos with AI models like Seedance. I built a little puzzle game to give them away: finish it and verify your email, and I’ll randomly pick 30 winners in 48 hours, each getting $1,000 in credits. The game starts in this tweet, in this photo... It should take you ~15 minutes. Good luck 👀 This little sponsorship experiment made me realize AI has pushed solopreneurship mainstream. Companies are sponsoring influencers, as we see on YouTube. This wasn't the case when I joined X in 2021. All my friends outside our indie-hacking bubble are talking about building their own internet business solo. I think it was meant to happen because solopreneurship unlocks two fundamental human desires: creativity and not-having-a-boss. If I had to bet, we're just at the beginning.

    2.4K7133281517K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20262.4x their median

    I'm ridiculously excited to finally ship this. GatherOS now automatically syncs your X bookmarks. No more losing great ideas to an endless feed. Try it for free now: https://t.co/ud0Iiz11Al https://t.co/yUCa7fAf2z

    2.1K7915419284K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.2x their median

    Playgrnd® beta is live. No account. No paywall. 100% free. 32 tiny tools for making weird, beautiful things, with new ones dropping every day. Animate in one click. Dither everything. Export SVGs. Go make something weird. 🛝 https://t.co/Vs4BkFweHm https://t.co/QSPhHPtnL9

    1.9K10712529205K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.1x their median

    I think I accidentally built one of the sickest branding tools on the internet. https://t.co/KrFpDM6yfU https://t.co/VQm0T1iFOp

    2.0K75804180K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.1x their median

    I can't imagine disliking someone so much that I'd willingly rob myself of the excitement of witnessing something genuinely this historic. https://t.co/aVJP1FjheA

    2.0K6843458K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.3x their median

    Introducing Higgsfield Layers. Our image editor with layer decomposition, flawless text rendering, and native 4K. > Upload or generate any image > Split it into layers and edit each separately > Regenerate any text or object without changing the whole image https://t.co/ra3eu7aEET

    1.2K15410349294K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.7x their median

    made a thing for your next brand project. oddgrid — generative pixel grid art. pick a look, set your palette, add motion. export as PNG, vector SVG, animated SVG, or video. free, no signup, runs entirely in your browser. https://t.co/khGw3iaJ25

    1.1K4244645K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20261.7x their median

    If this isn’t proof that Elon is the most insane inventor in human history, I don’t know what would. https://t.co/AdV2FiIr5g

    1.0K42451755K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.6x their median

    I’ve been building something new for designers. It’s called playgrnd®. A growing collection of tiny tools for making weird, useful, beautiful things. Launches next week. https://t.co/HyzNPmkIkE

    1.0K1860255K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 683 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.399%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Brett's engagement rate on X?
Brett (@BrettFromDJ) has an engagement rate of 0.399%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,025 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.399%, Brett sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BrettFromDJ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BrettFromDJ post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going