Back to @BrazilianHotwif's profile

BrazilianHotwife engagement report

@BrazilianHotwif - 266K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.153%
of 266K followers
Per impression
0.673%
60K views on a typical post
Reach
22.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
407
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
38 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 407 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.153%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 0.673% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

BrazilianHotwife's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.153%, BrazilianHotwife sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202622x their median

    Tô atrasada pra academia, mas não podia sair sem avisar 👇🏻 Termina HOJE às 18h! 👀⏰ Depois não fala que eu não avisei ☝🏻 https://t.co/MsfP6FZ0pv

    8.6K2391012514K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    O pronunciamento vocês já viram… 😂 Agora vamos voltar no tempo e mostrar como tudo aconteceu naquele dia. Mais um episódio da nossa vida real… 🎥 E pensar que tudo começou por causa de um simples símbolo… ♠️ https://t.co/r3Uh5m7oYf

    4.6K132191429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20265.2x their median

    Meu marido recebendo dois seguidores que ele nunca viu na vida como se fossem amigos de infância… 😂😂 https://t.co/p6cXQy6NFR

    2.0K9028099K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.1x their median

    O que vamos fazer no nosso primeiro dia em Goiânia? Quem acerta? https://t.co/0mG9OiHy8h

    2.0K58200143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.5x their median

    Adivinha quem foi curtir uma rave nesse final de semana e está acabada até agora? https://t.co/6a1FLm8r5O

    1.7K4733280K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.9x their median

    Se me encontrasse assim no elevador, apertava qual botão? 👀 https://t.co/ByTFy5LKg7

    1.5K5773268K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.0x their median

    A gente foi só pra curtir a festa… pelo menos esse era o plano. 😂👀 https://t.co/hF4UMb2gLY

    1.2K45120119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.7x their median

    Fomos conhecer os encantos e as magias das cachoeiras de pirinópolis 🫶🏻🙈 https://t.co/oJ2VsnnHJY

    1.1K31110183K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.5x their median

    PRONUNCIAMENTO OFICIAL SOBRE O OCORRIDO NO BANHEIRO DA BALADA Uma coisa que às vezes é bem chata quando a gente decide compartilhar a vida real por aqui são alguns julgamentos que aparecem como se quem estivesse do outro lado nunca tivesse cometido um erro ou assumido algum risco na vida. O que mostramos aqui é justamente isso: a nossa vida real. Sem roteiro e sem tentar parecer perfeitos até porque não somos. Mas queremos deixar uma coisa muito clara: não incentivamos e muito menos apoiamos relações desprotegidas. Pelo contrário. Na imensa maioria das nossas experiências existe proteção e, quando por alguma circunstância isso não aconteceu, sempre tivemos consciência dos riscos envolvidos e buscamos os cuidados necessários como fazer exames no dia da relação. Mostrar que algo aconteceu não significa dizer que aquilo é o correto ou recomendar que outras pessoas façam o mesmo. NÃO TENHAM RELAÇÕES DESPROTEGIDAS. A gente entende perfeitamente quem chama atenção para os riscos — e informação sobre prevenção é sempre bem-vinda. O que incomoda é quando a preocupação vira julgamento, principalmente porque ninguém conhece toda a realidade de outra pessoa através de alguns minutos publicados na internet. Vamos continuar mostrando nossas histórias como elas realmente aconteceram: os momentos bons, as loucuras, os acertos e também as escolhas que talvez hoje fizéssemos diferentes. Vida real não é sinônimo de vida perfeita. E nosso posicionamento é simples: cuidem-se, protejam-se, façam exames e tomem decisões conscientes. ❤️

    93929430220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.3x their median

    Amizades que valorizamos…. ♠️🤘🏻🫶🏻 https://t.co/RzRmBhHJY7

    90527110144K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 407 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.153%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 0.673% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is BrazilianHotwife's engagement rate on X?
BrazilianHotwife (@BrazilianHotwif) has an engagement rate of 0.153%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 265,741 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.153%, BrazilianHotwife sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BrazilianHotwif have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BrazilianHotwif post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going