Back to @BowesChay's profile

Chay Bowes engagement report

@BowesChay - 297K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.077%
of 297K followers
Per impression
3.67%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
228
interactions (median)
Saved
0.097%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 228 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.077%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 3.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 125x its own typical post.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chay Bowes's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.077%, Chay Bowes sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 2026125x their median

    Zelensky has refused to hold elections because "Its not safe for people to gather" Meanwhile, here's Kiev last night. The level of utter bullshit youve been fed about the Ukroscam is literally off the scales. https://t.co/G4TeVYTtZ5

    20K7.7K480217318K viewsView on X
  • Jan 4, 202625x their median

    Denmark has a dark past in Greenland, a past it would rather you didn't talk about, child abduction, forced sterilisation, forced Labour and exploitation. Denmark’s possession of Greenland, whose actual name is Kalaallit Nunaat, began as a mission to reclaim land from "lost" Norsemen but evolved into centuries of systemic cultural erasure and economic exploitation of the Indigenous Inuit. In 1721, Danish missionary Hans Egede arrived to "save" Norse descendants from paganism. Finding only Inuit, he instead forcibly converted them to Lutheranism, denouncing traditional shamans and rituals. Denmark then established a state trade monopoly in 1776, treating the island as a profitable hub for whale blubber and minerals while keeping the indigenous Inuit isolated and dependent. In 1953, Denmark formally annexed Greenland as a "county" to avoid UN decolonization requirements, this led to a period of brutal social engineering. This era also saw the sinister "Little Danes" experiment, where the state abducted Inuit children and relocated them to Denmark to be molded into a Danish-speaking elite, causing lifelong trauma. Simultaneously, thousands of Inuit were forcibly moved from ancestral hunting grounds into concrete apartment blocks to centralize labor for Danish controlled factories, devastating traditional kinship networks. Between 1966 and 1970, Danish authorities further violated Indigenous rights by secretly fitting over 4,500 Inuit women and girls, some as young as 12 with IUDs without consent to curb the population. While Greenland gained Home Rule in 1979 and Self-Government in 2009, the legacy of Danish control persists. As of today, Greenland remains a territory under the "Danish Crown" with some International bodies continimg to pressure Denmark to address its colonial legacy of racial discrimination and provide justice for the victims of the "Spiral Case" and forced child removals. So as the Danes shout about "US Imperialism" bear in mind how they came to control this region far from Danish shores, and how brutally they exploited it's people for the "Crown"

    9.9K3.8K2.0K8461.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202644x their median

    Japan demands Russia take down new memorial complex dedicated to the Soviet victory over Japan. This is the same Japan whose PM wouldn't even name the US as the country that nuked two of its cities. https://t.co/snB5lCVSf6

    8.4K1.4K20176336K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 202635x their median

    Ukraine is cozying up with Mexican drug cartels. Odessa ports are now transshipment hubs for European narcotrafficking. Allegedly, Zelensky's regime is chasing drug money, as if €90B in EU taxpayer money isn't enough. Cartels are also eyeing Ukraine's black market weapons. https://t.co/Zcgsqn3kB2

    5.3K2.3K288128134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202626x their median

    Another young man ripped from his family. Another crime ignored by the @BBC @CNN and @FRANCE24 Another flag for the graveyard. https://t.co/fBSFBb8mhn

    3.8K1.7K205146143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202625x their median

    Ukrainian firefighters filmed themselves attending another Russian strike on a "Civillian target" in Kiev. (Just ignore the part where they carry out the ammunition crates and the heavy machine guns) https://t.co/l6x66XR4RQ

    4.3K1.2K466396K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202621x their median

    Come out with your hands up @MarkJCarney You're surrounded son. https://t.co/9lgquPakMY

    3.5K63564573124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202620x their median

    Another wounded Ukrainain "hero" (Just ignore the massive swastikas on his hands) German taxpayers have been robbed of €100 billion to fund this insanity. https://t.co/VVqPo5msdW

    3.4K9899362110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202619x their median

    "Europe can exist without Russia, but it's unlikely to survive for long in a standoff with Russia." Bulgaria's PM Radev warns that supplying Ukraine with long-range weapons will have irreversible consequences. One of the last sane voices in the EU. Shame no one's listening. https://t.co/agQuybXRqh

    3.4K910592832K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202618x their median

    Handcuffed Ukrainians are bussed towards the front to die for NATO and Boris Johnson. Dragged from the streets of "Free" Ukraine, robbed, beaten, brutalised, given a weeks rudimentary training. Then this. The outcome is sadly inevitable. https://t.co/nc1hjBRo2T

    2.8K1.1K1567353K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 228 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.077%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 3.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 125x its own typical post.

What is Chay Bowes's engagement rate on X?
Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) has an engagement rate of 0.077%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 296,681 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.077%, Chay Bowes sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BowesChay have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BowesChay post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going