Back to @BostonDotCom's profile

Boston.com engagement report

@BostonDotCom - 428K followers on X

Measured over 120 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 428K followers
Per impression
0.055%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 120 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.055% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.845% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 120 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 120 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Boston.com's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Boston.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,787 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 149 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202656x their median

    Review and setlist: Bruno Mars showed the Boston crowd at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough why he is pop music's ultimate showman. https://t.co/QPgSKUBtnz

    8919228.8K viewsView on X
  • Feb 25, 202615x their median

    📲 We’re everywhere you are — and now on Apple News+ too! Hit follow across all your favorite platforms so you never miss a beat. Apple News+: https://t.co/TB7Q1JqWPN Facebook: https://t.co/VgJho0tWuj Instagram: https://t.co/OOlRlT8Qed Threads: https://t.co/TjFw2KYwtD TikTok: https://t.co/iw1wGjUKpO Nextdoor: https://t.co/sXDGnB0JXr Bluesky: https://t.co/aRzalOp0Pr Prioritize us on Google (be sure to check the box): https://t.co/0Jzt07OIwC

    15311019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20268.5x their median

    Way too often, the broadcast sounds like it could be called the World of Will Flemming Podcast, Chad Finn writes. https://t.co/fv7fyRYqWM

    607420K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.5x their median

    Look inside Omni Mount Washington Resort & Spa after a multi-million dollar makeover completed this summer. https://t.co/w084L9rF8M

    1700013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.0x their median

    New England Patriots wideout A.J. Brown is ready to make an impact in a variety of ways with his new team in 2026. https://t.co/krvFHaYG4e

    103106.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20266.5x their median

    A youth hockey player in Massachusetts has been suspended indefinitely after slashing at an opponent during a game in Foxborough. https://t.co/8EeJ04QCX4

    1012012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.5x their median

    Watertown students were finally able to enter their brand-new high school for the first day of school today. https://t.co/HaCn9MTDeD https://t.co/ZnzDkfYqLe

    112005.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.0x their median

    “It’s about making sure our young people walk into the classroom feeling confident, proud, and ready to be themselves.” https://t.co/OY3qgG3r5J https://t.co/LvQCWNbFwo

    110104.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20265.5x their median

    “There’s no difference to the snap…[or] to the taste" https://t.co/UO4nXHk6gM https://t.co/GBuSxcX7r0

    50605.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20265.0x their median

    Famed chef Julia Child was a staple of the Cambridge area where she lived for 40 years. https://t.co/11OZVfKjo9

    62206.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 120 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.055% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.845% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 120 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is Boston.com's engagement rate on X?
Boston.com (@BostonDotCom) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 120 original posts from the last 30 days against 428,131 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Boston.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BostonDotCom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BostonDotCom post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going