Boson engagement report
@BosonProtocol - 79K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 79K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 982 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Boson's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.066%, Boson sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 19% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 8, 202619x their median
Boson x402B - secure commerce infrastructure for the agentic economy - is live on mainnet! > Agentic Commerce is going exponential (a16z) > By 2030 Agentic Commerce will reach $5T (McKinsey) x402B enables agents to exchange any asset, of any value, between any counterparty. 🧵
- Aug 27, 20264.7x their median
the part of https://t.co/rDV9zxS2gX i’d watch most closely isn’t escrow. it’s what happens when two agents disagree. @termix_ai currently puts a challenge layer between delivery and final economic resolution: jobs commit terms upfront, deliverables are anchored onchain, and disputes can bring in a randomly selected three-evaluator panel. filing a bad challenge also carries a bond cost. that design matters because agent commerce has a verification problem that payments alone cannot fix. code execution can sometimes be proven mechanically. research quality, design work, risk analysis or data interpretation are much harder. a transfer rail can prove that 100 USDC moved, but it cannot prove the work deserved 100 USDC. so TermiX is effectively trying to price disagreement itself. providers have stake behind performance, challengers face a cost for abusing disputes, evaluators become part of settlement, and the final outcome feeds back into reputation. if agent markets scale, the scarce infrastructure may not be moving money between machines. it may be deciding when that money should move without putting a human moderator back in the loop. @KaitoAI
- Sep 11, 20262.5x their median
Introducing Held. Buy from a stranger, keep your money until it's sorted. Built on Boson. Never arrives? The case is raised for you. Arrives damaged? An AI proposes a split. In development. Demand turns a prototype into a product: https://t.co/QO3yB3NyTA https://t.co/sLuIyZE2Qs
- Sep 29, 20262.4x their median
Buy anything you see on X, with your money held safe until it arrives. Tag an agent under any product post. Pay once. The payment sits in Boson escrow until the item reaches you. Buy with Boson. Coming soon on 𝕏 https://t.co/IvgIs1i8AW
- Aug 11, 20261.8x their median
Live! The Facet Adapter for WooCommerce — Powered by Boson. @facetllc, one of the hottest agent-commerce startups, has opened WooCommerce to AI agents — the largest ecommerce platform on the planet by store count, more than four million live stores. Every purchase settles through x402B, backed by Boson escrow. The money is held until the order is fulfilled: the buyer receives the item, or gets their money back. The @BosonProtocol ecosystem is growing.
- Aug 4, 2026
Now live across every registry: Boson dACP. 98,000+ listings across the four biggest MCP registries. SDKs pulled 116M+ times a week. That's the MCP ecosystem — and secure commerce is now one install away, anywhere in it. Boson dACP: Secure Agentic Commerce for Everything https://t.co/p0iLNaHFqL
- Sep 29, 2026
A serviced 1970s steel dive watch for $1,450, in a stranger's post. Would you wire that much and hope? Tag the agent, pay once, and your money stays in Boson escrow until it arrives. Buy with Boson. Coming soon on 𝕏 https://t.co/CmAu65mNQv
- Sep 29, 2026
Buy anything you see on X, with your money held safe until it arrives. Tag an agent under any product post. Pay once. The payment sits in Boson escrow until the item reaches you. Buy with Boson. Coming soon on 𝕏 https://t.co/XZEZf6ZOYT
- Sep 1, 2026
Three weeks ago, stores could start selling to AI agents. Today, agents can start buying. Facet's shopping skill is an open-source client any agent installs to shop a Facet-enabled store: find the door, identify itself, build a checkout, ask its human, pay from its own wallet. The money settles in Boson escrow on Base mainnet by default — held by a contract until the store delivers. Supply side, demand side, one rail underneath both. Agentic commerce is being built on Boson x402B. https://t.co/fOtGHSgwhr
- Aug 3, 2026
Now live on Smithery: Boson dACP. Smithery lists 13,500+ MCPs — it's where devs wire agents to tools in minutes. Boson dACP now slots in: shipped agents can pay and get paid safely. Escrow, disputes, settlement: handled. Boson dACP: Secure Agentic Commerce for Everything https://t.co/lKdrGbPhsq
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 79K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 982 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
- What is Boson's engagement rate on X?
- Boson (@BosonProtocol) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 79,203 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.066%, Boson sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BosonProtocol have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BosonProtocol post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.