Back to @BonginoReport's profile

Bongino Report engagement report

@BonginoReport - 590K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 590K followers
Per impression
1.57%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
111
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.97/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 111 interactions against 590K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 43% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bongino Report's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Bongino Report sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 161 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202622x their median

    A Lindsay Clancy juror accidentally told on HIMSELF when he tried to attack the one HEROIC juror who refused to let Clancy walk free 💥 “Your morals are out of place!” — @Shawn_Farash https://t.co/MMAkwDclR5

    2.0K40292856K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202620x their median

    There’s a dirty secret behind the anti-Trump propaganda flooding your social media feeds… and you’re being straight up LIED to ‼️ “I told you to follow the money!” – @dbongino https://t.co/fJiWNVGwhK

    1.4K3933842354K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202616x their median

    Joey Jones UNLOADS on Hasan Piker with a BRUTAL truth bomb. We need more of this 💥 “Wow, good for you, Joe!” — @dbongino https://t.co/DHDKYbFlaP

    1.4K30016216K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202612x their median

    You need to hear this warning that went NUCLEAR on social media. What’s happening in France is not only coming here, but it’s here NOW ⚠️🚨 “How many more warnings could you possibly need?!” — @dbongino https://t.co/ws5IaJFJAP

    95239728715K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20269.8x their median

    Zohran Mamdani just got a taste of his own medicine… from a leftist mob. He clearly did NOT see this reality check coming 😂😬 “There is no one pure enough for these people!” — @dbongino https://t.co/rzPSiUJsGF

    89017817317K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.1x their median

    🚨 @VinceCoglianese says someone just committed “treason” to hurt Trump… and The Washington Post helped them do it 👇 https://t.co/VTmXNDc4Kz

    75320840617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.7x their median

    Scott Bessent is a national treasure 😂😂😂 https://t.co/FPBSTz5Kcr

    8708317016K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20268.3x their median

    Zohran Mamdani and AOC were CAUGHT on camera showing their TRUE COLORS at a 9/11 memorial… shocking doesn’t even begin to describe this 🤬 @Shawn_Farash: “F you and the horse you rode in on!” https://t.co/9exu9oINeO

    68718836536K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20267.9x their median

    This poor woman just learned what happens when socialists run cities. They turn to s**t — literally! 💩 “This lady had first contact. It didn’t smell good!” — @dbongino https://t.co/jiME3bIICe

    68716223438K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20267.8x their median

    This father STARED down Democrats and told the TRUTH about their evil policies. You have to watch every second of this 🔥👏 “Grow a pair of nuts and tell him what he just said is wrong… you can’t!” — @dbongino https://t.co/DytvRl7vL9

    7001546111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 111 interactions against 590K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 43% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Bongino Report's engagement rate on X?
Bongino Report (@BonginoReport) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 590,215 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Bongino Report sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BonginoReport have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BonginoReport post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going