Back to @Boldstocksbabe's profile

BoldStocksBabe engagement report

@Boldstocksbabe - 70K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.104%
of 70K followers
Per impression
0.561%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
18.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.561% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 91 interactions. Recurring topics include #digitalmedia, #ai, #gold.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #digitalmedia, #ai, #gold.

Compared with accounts its own size

BoldStocksBabe's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.104%, BoldStocksBabe sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link89% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 428 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026

    Quantum X (OTC: $QUTX) is official. New name. New ticker. Clearer mission. EntangleX moved from development to beta and a hosted AI-assisted quantum simulator. That’s more than a rebrand. It’s a buildout. #QUTX #AI #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    7991218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    VisionWave (Nasdaq: $VWAV) Okayyy, this one is pretty wild. 👀 VisionWave filed a U.S. non-provisional patent application describing ARGUS™, a proposed space-enabled, AI-driven counter-drone architecture bringing sensing, resilient communications, command-and-control and coordinated response layers into one framework. That is a serious defense-tech concept with a lot of moving pieces coming together. Read more: https://t.co/9hkLhtmr4p @VWAVInc #VWAV #DefenseTechnology #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement #AD – Paid Dissemination

    69106012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    A press release disappears fast if nobody builds around it. That is why Cornerstone’s newsroom is designed as a permanent, source-linked layer around company developments—independent reporting and clearly labelled sponsored coverage, organized by sector and ticker. The feed moves. The archive stays. Browse the newsroom: https://t.co/rWjVlBOA3a #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement #PublicMarkets

    6993012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Cornerstone Marketing isn’t one generic feed wearing seven different profile pictures. Each account has its own lane—company developments, market context, catalysts, research, storytelling and distribution—while the sourcing and campaign direction stay coordinated behind the scenes. Different voices. One system. Meet the team: https://t.co/cvhqNkysvk #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement #ContentMarketing

    6893013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Galloper Gold Drills turning. Now we watch the core. Galloper Gold (CSE: $BOOM | OTC: $GGDCF) has commenced a planned approximately 7,000-metre, 30-hole diamond-drill program at Glover Island. The first target is Kettle Pond South, with follow-up work intended to test continuity and depth. That is the signal worth watching next. Read more: https://t.co/M1LDYa5aNv #BOOM #GGDCF #Gold #OTC #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    6792011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    SECUR3D Holdings (CSE: $SRD) Sentry development coverage is now up to 22 online marketplaces, with limited testing already spanning more than 2,000 listings across eight enterprise engagements. That is a pretty interesting AI + brand-protection niche to watch. #SRD #AI #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    7071013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Onyx Gold (TSXV: $ONYX | OTCQX: $ONXGF) This is how you clean up a land position. 👀 Onyx says it now controls 100% of the key surface and mineral rights surrounding the Argus Gold System within a three-kilometre radius after a series of property acquisitions and an accelerated option exercise. Less fragmented ground around a growing discovery is a pretty straightforward strategic win. Read more: https://t.co/g7khMa5KBc @OnyxGoldCorp #ONYX #ONXGF #Gold #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    6683012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Contango Silver and Gold (NYSE American/TSX: $CTGO) 506 g/t AgEq over 13.90 metres at Torbrit. 807 g/t AgEq over 4.96 metres at North Star. Yeah, those numbers know how to make an entrance. 👀 The bigger detail: step-out drilling confirmed a mineralized zone connecting the two deposits, and the 2026 campaign has expanded beyond 50,000 metres. High grade gets the headline. Continuity is what keeps me reading. Read more: https://t.co/qUFo9vWAMs #CTGO #Silver #Exploration #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    7070013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Wall Street snapped back Thursday. 👀 The S&P 500 gained 1.1%, the Nasdaq jumped 1.7% and the Dow added 0.6% as oil eased and Treasury yields backed off. One day after the Fed hike, the market’s message was basically: okay, now show me the follow-through. Read more: https://t.co/0w65disXf9 #StockMarket #Macro #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    6690012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Gold had a move today. ✨ December gold futures settled at $4,387.50, up $54.70 on the session, while the broader precious-metals complex stayed sensitive to rates, inflation and geopolitical risk. That is exactly why I keep one eye on the macro screen even when the small-cap stories are getting all the attention. Read more: https://t.co/YCWHuqPvKO #Gold #Commodities #DigitalMedia #MediaPlacement

    6078011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#digitalmedia#ai#gold#mediaplacement#ad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.561% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 91 interactions. Recurring topics include #digitalmedia, #ai, #gold.

What is BoldStocksBabe's engagement rate on X?
BoldStocksBabe (@Boldstocksbabe) has an engagement rate of 0.104%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 69,790 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.104%, BoldStocksBabe sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Boldstocksbabe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Boldstocksbabe post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going