Bojana Maljević engagement report
@BojanaMaljevic - 150K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 290 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.193%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 3.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #svinaizbore, #talkingbox, #gradimopozorištezajedno.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #svinaizbore, #talkingbox, #gradimopozorištezajedno.
Compared with accounts its own size
Bojana Maljević's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.193%, Bojana Maljević sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 50% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 283 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 20268.5x their median
#НоваФотографијаПрофила https://t.co/vDVi5mevOk
- Sep 13, 20262.5x their median
Sad kad je završeno kidanje sa potpisima za Studentsku listu, da se vratim opet na 2023. kada su zloupotrebljeni (izmedju ostalih) moj potpis i svi lični podaci. Tužilaštvo do danas nije reagovalo! O tome sam mnogo puta pisala i ako se još neko pita kako se skupe potpisi za sat vremena - evo ovako. S tim u vezi, gde je i šta radi opštinska overiteljka koja je uradila ovo krivično delo i koliko je overitelja sada opet učinilo isto? Imate pravo da pitate RIK da li se vaše ime i potpis nalaze na nekoj listi i na kojoj. I da prijavite ako je neko zloupotrebio vaše podatke. Možete da iskoristite model moje prijave, iako je bila za gradske izbore.
- Aug 27, 20262.4x their median
Ratko Mladić je umro. Iza njega ostaju pravosnažne presude za genocid, zločine protiv čovečnosti i ratne zločine. Ali pre svega ostaju mrtvi, njihove porodice i društva koja više od tri decenije nose posledice ratova. Njegova smrt neće vratiti nijednu žrtvu niti zatvoriti rane. Ali može biti trenutak u kojem ćemo odlučiti šta više ne želimo da nosimo u budućnost. Generacije ljudi na prostoru bivše Jugoslavije odrasle su uz ratove koje nisu započele, mržnje koje nisu stvorile i podele koje im se i danas nude kao jedina moguća sudbina. Mi odbijamo da verujemo da je to naša sudbina. Evropa je posle svojih najstrašnijih ratova izabrala saradnju umesto sukoba, institucije umesto oružja i solidarnost umesto neprijateljstva. To je evropska ideja koju želimo za Srbiju. I Srbija koju želimo u Evropi. Ne želimo zaborav ni relativizaciju zločina. Ne prihvatamo kolektivnu krivicu bilo kog naroda. Želimo istinu, odgovornost i mir. Ratko Mladić sada pripada istoriji. Vreme je da joj pripadne i politika koja je iza sebe ostavila mrtve, raseljene i generacije naučene da se plaše svojih suseda. Zato danas želimo da govorimo o životu posle njega: o Srbiji koja neće tražiti neprijatelje među susedima, o Balkanu na kojem granice postaju neprimetne, a ljudi ih prelaze bez straha. I, najviše, o generaciji kojoj ćemo konačno ostaviti nešto bolje od naših ratova. Možemo da živimo u miru, da sarađujemo i da jedni drugima pomažemo. Evropa je dokaz da narodi ne moraju zauvek ostati zarobljenici svoje najgore istorije Vreme je da i mi konačno izađemo iz svoje i krenemo u budućnost. Ceo tekst na: https://t.co/mM3IHc53Ma
- Sep 8, 2026
Nije lako gledati sve ovo... ali empirijski je dokazano da se stvari neretko menjaju upravo onda kada deluju nepromenljivo
- Sep 24, 2026
Prof. Nikolić bila odlična! A što je skraćena Debata na N1 za čitavih pola sata?
- Aug 5, 2026
Pre više od tri nedelje (13. jula) napisala sam pismo studentima univerziteta u Nišu, upravo pred početak procesa veta (16.7.), odnosno u jedinom trenutku kada sam imala dovoljno informacija da bih mogla da donesem odgovornu procenu i odluku. Pismo nije bilo namenjeno javnosti. Zato ga nikada nisam objavila na svojim profilima, niti slala medijima. Pismo je dospelo u javnost. Od tada je više puta citirano, prepričavano i tumačeno. Analizirano je uz nedostajuće informacije (za čitaoce kojima nije namenjeno). Pojavljivali su se, u medijima i na mrežama, navodi i rečenice koje nikada nisam napisala i učitavale namere koje nisu postojale. Pismo nije nastalo kao politički tekst. Nastalo je zato što sam smatrala da u jednom ovako važnom procesu moraju postojati: jasna pravila sa kojima su upoznati na vreme svi oni kojih se proces tiče; predvidiv postupak i jednaka zaštita, kako za studente tako i za njihove kandidate. I da je, zbog svega što nas čeka, neopisivo važno vratiti poverenje u taj proces. Nisam reagovala. Nisam odgovarala novinarima, nisam prihvatila nijedan intervju, niti ulazila u rasprave i gadosti. Rekla sam već da je svako čitao pismo u granicama svoje pokvarenosti. Sada samo dodajem: svako je i reagovao u svojim granicama... Nisam bila sama u tome. Studenti su bili tu i nemam reči kojima bih opisala pamet, poštenje i požrtvovanost nekolicine sa kojima sam u kontaktu. Bilo je i mnogo ljudi uz mene. Nisam objavljivala brojne podrške smatrajući da je najvažniji događaj ODGOVOR tabloidnom pisanju odnosno - Saopštenje studenata iz Niša. Takođe sam mislila da će njihov odgovor ipak zainteresovati sve učesnike procesa. Ono što je do danas izostalo je adekvatna javna reakcija drugih kandidata za SL, mahom jer nisu bili upoznati (sa dokumentacijom), ili zato što nisu imali lične kapacitete da se bave tabloidnim razvlačenjem, prvo studenata a potom i mene po mrežama. Za to vreme vlast je koristila i ono što je u mom pismu činjenično stajalo ali i sve pripadajuće spinove. Ne znam da li je neko iz svega toga naučio nešto. Ja jesam. Danas, 5.8. uoči isteka roka za "argumentaciju" u postupku tekućeg studentskog "državnog veta", mislim da je ispravno da svako ko želi može da pročita ono što sam zaista napisala. Zato prvi put objavljujem celo pismo, onako kako sam ga napisala. I odgovor studenata, iz kojeg su naši odnosi i međusobno razumevanje nedvosmisleno jasni. Hvala svima koji su to isticali. Ne očekujem da većinu ovo uopšte zanima. Ali verujem da je bolje da postoje izvorni dokumenti nego njihovi delovi, tumačenja ili nepostojeće reči. Možda zatreba, nekad. Za neko tačnije tumačenje. Kada sam pisala o nezaštićenosti kandidata, nisam mislila samo na sam postupak odlučivanja. Iz moje vizure svejedno je ko će ostati na SL. Mislila sam i na period koji sledi dok konačna lista ne bude utvrđena. Verovala sam da kandidati moraju (a izmenama u proceduri bi i mogli) biti zaštićeni od proizvoljnih i neproverenih optužbi, medijskih konstrukcija, pretnji i javnih presuda za koje niko neće preuzimati odgovornost. Vidimo da se brojnim kandidatima to već dešava poslednjih dana. I to nije dobro. U narednom periodu biće i gore, jer kao što je moje pismo dospelo u tabloide - dospeće i cele "argumentacije i kontraargumentacije studenata" u procesu vetiranja, koji uz sve sad ima i večno trajanje. I danas mislim da to ide na ruku svima koji su protiv studenata i promena koje žele građani. Ne postoji ništa što, primerice, utvrđuje da li će neko napisati predlog za nečiji veto (a može bilo ko da napiše) na osnovu činjenica, tračeva ili prostog utiska o nečemu. Smatram da ovo treba imati u vidu kada tabloidi krenu da bombarduju "studentskim informacijama". Upravo zato mi je važno da, bez posrednika, ostanu dostupna oba dokumenta: moje pismo i odgovor studenata. Neka svako ko želi pročita i donese sopstveni sud. Pogotovo u nedeljama i mesecima koji dolaze. 🫶
- Sep 16, 2026
3N, by the way, Nije Nego Narod 🫶 https://t.co/ynThwklcJt
- Sep 7, 2026
Nema bolje, za danas. https://t.co/JmnOH2KE8K
- Aug 16, 2026
Najopasniji trenutak nije kada ljudi poveruju u laž, nego kada posle dovoljno laži, prestanu da veruju bilo kome i bilo čemu. Sa ljudima koji više ne mogu da razlikuju istinu od laži, vlast može da radi šta hoće. Apropo izlaza, našeg.
- Aug 27, 2026
Nada umire poslednja https://t.co/kHTu5b7VqX
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 290 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.193%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 3.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #svinaizbore, #talkingbox, #gradimopozorištezajedno.
- What is Bojana Maljević's engagement rate on X?
- Bojana Maljević (@BojanaMaljevic) has an engagement rate of 0.193%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 149,827 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.193%, Bojana Maljević sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BojanaMaljevic have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BojanaMaljevic post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.