Back to @Boby06981247's profile

đŸŒģđŸ”Ģ( āϗ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĄā§€ āĻŽā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ )đŸ”ĢđŸŒģ engagement report

@Boby06981247 - 133K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.01%
of 133K followers
Per impression
2.03%
639 views on a typical post
Reach
0.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 639 times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.481% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 267x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chandniraat, #moonlight, #āĻ…āĻĒā§āϰāĻ•āĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ…āύ⧁āĻ­ā§‚āϤāĻŋ.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #chandniraat, #moonlight, #āĻ…āĻĒā§āϰāĻ•āĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ…āύ⧁āĻ­ā§‚āϤāĻŋ.

Compared with accounts its own size

đŸŒģđŸ”Ģ( āϗ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĄā§€ āĻŽā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ )đŸ”ĢđŸŒģ's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, đŸŒģđŸ”Ģ( āϗ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĄā§€ āĻŽā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ )đŸ”ĢđŸŒģ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video18% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 25, 2020267x their median

    āĻĒ⧃āĻĨāĻŋāĻŦā§€āϤ⧇ āĻāĻŽāύ āĻāĻ•āϜāύ āύāĻžāϰ⧀ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧇āύāĨ¤ āϝāĻžāϰ āĻĒāĻŋāϤāĻž āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧇āύ āύāĻŦā§€, āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻŽā§€ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧇āύ āύāĻŦā§€, āĻ­āĻžāχ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧇āύ āύāĻŦā§€ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āϛ⧇āϞ⧇āĻ“ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧇āύ āύāĻŦā§€, āϕ⧇ āϏ⧇ āĻŽāĻšāĻŋāϝāĻŧāϏ⧀ āύāĻžāϰ⧀?

    3.0K12530211View on X
  • Sep 29, 20265.6x their median

    āĻĻāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ āĻšāϞ⧇ āϭ⧇āϤāϰ⧇ āϭ⧇āϤāϰ⧇ āϭ⧇āϙ⧇ āϚ⧁āϰāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϝāĻžāĻŦā§‹, āϤāĻŦ⧁āĻ“â€”āφāĻĒāύāĻžāϕ⧇ āφāϰ āĻŦāϞāĻŦā§‹ āύāĻž, āϝ⧇ āφāĻŽāĻžāϰ “āĻ…āύ⧇āĻ• āĻ•āĻˇā§āϟ āĻšāϝāĻŧ..!!” 💔

    613901.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.8x their median

    🌙 “āϚāĻžāρāĻĻ⧇āϰāĻ“ āĻ•āϞāĻ™ā§āĻ• āφāϛ⧇, āϤāĻŦ⧁āĻ“ āϏ⧇ āϰāĻžāϤ⧇āϰ āφāĻ•āĻžāĻļ⧇āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻšā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻ•āĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ•ā§āώāĻŋāϤ āϏ⧌āĻ¨ā§āĻĻāĻ°ā§āϝāĨ¤â€ https://t.co/qN6tf3xGtS

    40270943 viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.5x their median

    āφāĻ˛ā§āϞāĻžāĻšāϰ āϏāĻžāĻŽāύ⧇ āφāĻŽāĻŋ āύāĻŋāσāĻ¸ā§āĻŦ āĻāĻ• āĻŦāĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻĻāĻž! āĻ–āĻžāϞāĻŋ āĻšāĻžāϤ⧇ āĻāϏ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āĻāĻ•āĻĻāĻŋāύ āĻ–āĻžāϞāĻŋ āĻšāĻžāϤ⧇āχ āϚāϞ⧇ āϝāĻžāĻŦ, āĻŽāĻžāĻāĻ–āĻžāύ⧇āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁āχ āφāĻ˛ā§āϞāĻžāĻšāϰ āφāĻŽāĻžāύāϤāĨ¤

    412201.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.1x their median

    āĻĻ⧁āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĻ­ā§‹āĻ— āϤ⧋ āĻ…āĻ˛ā§āĻĒāχāĨ¤ āφāϰ āϝāĻžāϰāĻž āϤāĻžāĻ•āĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻž āĻ…āĻŦāϞāĻŽā§āĻŦāύ āĻ•āϰ⧇, āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āφāĻ–āĻŋāϰāĻžāϤ āωāĻ¤ā§āϤāĻŽāĨ¤ — āϏ⧂āϰāĻž āφāύ-āύāĻŋāϏāĻž, āφāϝāĻŧāĻžāϤ : ā§­ā§­ (āφāϝāĻŧāĻžāϤāĻžāĻ‚āĻļ)

    363101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.1x their median

    āϏāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϜāĻŋāĻ• āĻœā§€āĻŦāύ⧇ āϝāϤāϗ⧁āϞ⧋ āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ• āφāϛ⧇ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁āĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āϤāĻžāρāϰ āĻŽāĻ§ā§āϝ⧇ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āϝāϤāĻŽāĨ¤ āĻ•āĻžāϰāύ āĻŽāύ⧇āϰ āϏ⧁āĻ– āĻĻ⧁āσāĻ– āϗ⧁āϞ⧋ āĻāĻ•āĻŽāĻžāĻ¤ā§āϰ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁āϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨ⧇āχ āĻ­āĻžāĻ—āĻžāĻ­āĻžāĻ—āĻŋ āĻ•āϰāĻž āϝāĻžāϝāĻŧāĨ¤ āϤāĻŦ⧇ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁āĻ¤ā§āĻŦīŋŊīŋŊīŋŊāϰ āĻŽāĻ§ā§āϝ⧇āĻ“ āĻ­āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āύāϤāĻž āϰāϝāĻŧ⧇āϛ⧇āĨ¤ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁ āϏāĻŦ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋ āĻĒāĻĨ⧇ āφāĻšāĻŦāĻžāύ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āφāϰ āĻĻ⧁āĻˇā§āϟ⧁ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁ āĻ–āĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒ āĻĒāĻĨ⧇āĨ¤ ⓑ☏ⓞ☏ⓑ☏ⓨ

    331601.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.7x their median

    āϝāĻžāϰāĻž āĻ–āĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϛ⧇āĻĄāĻŧ⧇ āϗ⧇āϛ⧇ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨ⧇ āύāĻžāχ āĻŦāĻž āĻšāϞ⧋ āĻĻā§āĻŦāĻŋāϤ⧀āϝāĻŧ āϏāĻžāĻ•ā§āώāĻžā§ŽāĨ¤đŸ’”

    291501.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.7x their median

    āĻļ⧇āώ āĻŦāϝāĻŧāϏ⧇ āĻ­āĻžāχ-āĻŦā§‹āύ" āĻāĻ•āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āϝ⧇ āĻ­āĻžāχ-āĻŦā§‹āύ āĻāϕ⧇ āĻ…āĻĒāϰ⧇āϰ āϏ⧁āĻ–-āĻĻ⧁āσāϖ⧇āϰ āϏāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ, āφāϜ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻ•āĻĨāĻžāĻ“ āĻšāϝāĻŧ āĻĒā§āϰāϝāĻŧā§‹āϜāύ⧇āϰ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ⧇āĨ¤ āϤāĻŦ⧁āĻ“ āĻŽāύ⧇ āϰ⧇āĻ–ā§‹, āĻ­āĻžāχ-āĻŦā§‹āύ⧇āϰ āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ•āϟāĻž āĻ…āĻ­āĻŋāĻŽāĻžāύ āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻļ⧇āώ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āĻĻāĻŋāĻ“ āύāĻžāĨ¤ āĻŦāĻžāĻŦāĻž-āĻŽāĻžāϝāĻŧ⧇āϰ āĻĒāϰ⧇ āĻāχ āĻŽāĻžāύ⧁āώāϗ⧁āϞ⧋āχ āϤ⧋ āϤ⧋āĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻļ⧈āĻļāĻŦ⧇āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻšā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻŦāĻĄāĻŧ āϏāĻžāĻ•ā§āώ⧀āĨ¤ āĻœā§€āĻŦāύ āĻāĻ•āĻĻāĻŋāύ āĻļ⧇āώ āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϝāĻžāĻŦ⧇, āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ¤ā§āϤāĻŋ, āĻ…āĻšāĻ‚āĻ•āĻžāϰ,

    27440934 viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.6x their median

    āϤāĻŦ⧇ āφāĻŽāĻžāϰ āφāϰ āϕ⧋āύ⧋ āφāĻĢāϏ⧋āϏ āύ⧇āχāĨ¤ āφāĻŽāĻŋ āϝāĻžāϕ⧇ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋āĻŦ⧇āϏ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āϤāĻžāϕ⧇ āϏāĻ°ā§āĻŦā§‹āĻšā§āϚāϟāĻž āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋āĻŦ⧇āϏ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽāĨ¤ āϏ⧇ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ āφāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋āĻŦāĻžāϏāĻž, āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻ…āύ⧁āĻ­ā§‚āϤāĻŋāĨ¤āϤāĻžāϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝāχ feel āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āĻĒ⧇āϰ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ teenage-āĻāϰ āϏ⧇āχ sweet feelingsāĨ¤āϤāĻžāϰ āĻĒā§āϰ⧇āĻŽā§‡ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧ⧇ āϝ⧇ āϏ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĻāϰ āĻ…āύ⧁āĻ­ā§‚āϤāĻŋāϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āĻŽ āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞ, āϏ⧇ āĻŦ⧁āĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞ āϕ⧇āύ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋āĻŦāĻžāϏāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻž āωāϚāĻŋāϤ

    261701.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.5x their median

    "āύāĻŋāĻœā§‡'āϕ⧇ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āϰāĻŖ āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻž āφāĻ˛ā§āϞāĻžāĻšāϰ āĻĒāĻ•ā§āώ āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āĻ…āύ⧇āĻ• āĻŦāĻĄāĻŧ āĻāĻ•āϟāĻŋ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻžāĻŽāϤ.!🖤

    300301.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chandniraat#moonlight#āĻ…āĻĒā§āϰāĻ•āĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ…āύ⧁āĻ­ā§‚āϤāĻŋ#āφāĻšāϤ_āĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϤāĻŋāĻˇā§āĻ•#āĻœā§‹āĻ›āύāĻžāϰāĻžāϤ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 639 times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.481% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 267x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chandniraat, #moonlight, #āĻ…āĻĒā§āϰāĻ•āĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ…āύ⧁āĻ­ā§‚āϤāĻŋ.

What is đŸŒģđŸ”Ģ( āϗ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĄā§€ āĻŽā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ )đŸ”ĢđŸŒģ's engagement rate on X?
đŸŒģđŸ”Ģ( āϗ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĄā§€ āĻŽā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ )đŸ”ĢđŸŒģ (@Boby06981247) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,797 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, đŸŒģđŸ”Ģ( āϗ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĄā§€ āĻŽā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ )đŸ”ĢđŸŒģ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Boby06981247 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Boby06981247 post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going