đģđĢ( āĻā§āύā§āĻĄā§ āĻŽā§āϝāĻŧā§ )đĢđģ engagement report
@Boby06981247 - 133K followers on X
Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 639 times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.481% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 267x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chandniraat, #moonlight, #āĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ āύā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋ.
Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #chandniraat, #moonlight, #āĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ āύā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋ.
Compared with accounts its own size
đģđĢ( āĻā§āύā§āĻĄā§ āĻŽā§āϝāĻŧā§ )đĢđģ's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.01%, đģđĢ( āĻā§āύā§āĻĄā§ āĻŽā§āϝāĻŧā§ )đĢđģ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 18% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 25, 2020267x their median
āĻĒā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻŦā§āϤ⧠āĻāĻŽāύ āĻāĻāĻāύ āύāĻžāϰ⧠āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύāĨ¤ āϝāĻžāϰ āĻĒāĻŋāϤāĻž āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āύāĻŦā§, āϏā§āĻŦāĻžāĻŽā§ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āύāĻŦā§, āĻāĻžāĻ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āύāĻŦā§ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻā§āϞā§āĻ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āύāĻŦā§, āĻā§ āϏ⧠āĻŽāĻšāĻŋāϝāĻŧāϏ⧠āύāĻžāϰā§?
- Sep 29, 20265.6x their median
āĻĻāϰāĻāĻžāϰ āĻšāϞ⧠āĻā§āϤāϰ⧠āĻā§āϤāϰ⧠āĻā§āĻā§ āĻā§āϰāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§ āϝāĻžāĻŦā§, āϤāĻŦā§āĻâāĻāĻĒāύāĻžāĻā§ āĻāϰ āĻŦāϞāĻŦā§ āύāĻž, āϝ⧠āĻāĻŽāĻžāϰ âāĻ āύā§āĻ āĻāώā§āĻ āĻšāϝāĻŧ..!!â đ
- Sep 28, 20263.8x their median
đ âāĻāĻžāĻāĻĻā§āϰāĻ āĻāϞāĻā§āĻ āĻāĻā§, āϤāĻŦā§āĻ āϏ⧠āϰāĻžāϤā§āϰ āĻāĻāĻžāĻļā§āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻā§āϝāĻŧā§ āĻāĻžāĻā§āĻā§āώāĻŋāϤ āϏā§āύā§āĻĻāϰā§āϝāĨ¤â https://t.co/qN6tf3xGtS
- Sep 29, 20263.5x their median
āĻāϞā§āϞāĻžāĻšāϰ āϏāĻžāĻŽāύ⧠āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āύāĻŋāĻāϏā§āĻŦ āĻāĻ āĻŦāĻžāύā§āĻĻāĻž! āĻāĻžāϞāĻŋ āĻšāĻžāϤ⧠āĻāϏā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āĻāĻāĻĻāĻŋāύ āĻāĻžāϞāĻŋ āĻšāĻžāϤā§āĻ āĻāϞ⧠āϝāĻžāĻŦ, āĻŽāĻžāĻāĻāĻžāύā§āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻāĻŋāĻā§āĻ āĻāϞā§āϞāĻžāĻšāϰ āĻāĻŽāĻžāύāϤāĨ¤
- Sep 29, 20263.1x their median
āĻĻā§āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĻā§āĻ āϤ⧠āĻ āϞā§āĻĒāĻāĨ¤ āĻāϰ āϝāĻžāϰāĻž āϤāĻžāĻāĻāϝāĻŧāĻž āĻ āĻŦāϞāĻŽā§āĻŦāύ āĻāϰā§, āϤāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāύā§āϝ āĻāĻāĻŋāϰāĻžāϤ āĻāϤā§āϤāĻŽāĨ¤ â āϏā§āϰāĻž āĻāύ-āύāĻŋāϏāĻž, āĻāϝāĻŧāĻžāϤ : ā§ā§ (āĻāϝāĻŧāĻžāϤāĻžāĻāĻļ)
- Sep 28, 20263.1x their median
āϏāĻžāĻŽāĻžāĻāĻŋāĻ āĻā§āĻŦāύ⧠āϝāϤāĻā§āϞ⧠āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāϰā§āĻ āĻāĻā§ āĻŦāύā§āϧā§āϤā§āĻŦ āϤāĻžāĻāϰ āĻŽāϧā§āϝ⧠āĻ āύā§āϝāϤāĻŽāĨ¤ āĻāĻžāϰāύ āĻŽāύā§āϰ āϏā§āĻ āĻĻā§āĻāĻ āĻā§āϞ⧠āĻāĻāĻŽāĻžāϤā§āϰ āĻŦāύā§āϧā§āϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨā§āĻ āĻāĻžāĻāĻžāĻāĻžāĻāĻŋ āĻāϰāĻž āϝāĻžāϝāĻŧāĨ¤ āϤāĻŦā§ āĻŦāύā§āϧā§āϤā§āĻŦīŋŊīŋŊīŋŊāϰ āĻŽāϧā§āϝā§āĻ āĻāĻŋāύā§āύāϤāĻž āϰāϝāĻŧā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āĻāĻžāϞ⧠āĻŦāύā§āϧ⧠āϏāĻŦ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āĻāĻžāϞ⧠āĻĒāĻĨā§ āĻāĻšāĻŦāĻžāύ āĻāϰ⧠āĻāϰ āĻĻā§āώā§āĻā§ āĻŦāύā§āϧ⧠āĻāĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒ āĻĒāĻĨā§āĨ¤ âââââââ¨
- Sep 29, 20262.7x their median
āϝāĻžāϰāĻž āĻāĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧā§ āĻā§āĻĄāĻŧā§ āĻā§āĻā§ āϤāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨā§ āύāĻžāĻ āĻŦāĻž āĻšāϞ⧠āĻĻā§āĻŦāĻŋāϤā§āϝāĻŧ āϏāĻžāĻā§āώāĻžā§āĨ¤đ
- Sep 28, 20262.7x their median
āĻļā§āώ āĻŦāϝāĻŧāϏ⧠āĻāĻžāĻ-āĻŦā§āύ" āĻāĻāϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āϝ⧠āĻāĻžāĻ-āĻŦā§āύ āĻāĻā§ āĻ āĻĒāϰā§āϰ āϏā§āĻ-āĻĻā§āĻāĻā§āϰ āϏāĻā§āĻā§ āĻāĻŋāϞ, āĻāĻ āϤāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāĻĨāĻžāĻ āĻšāϝāĻŧ āĻĒā§āϰāϝāĻŧā§āĻāύā§āϰ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧā§āĨ¤ āϤāĻŦā§āĻ āĻŽāύ⧠āϰā§āĻā§, āĻāĻžāĻ-āĻŦā§āύā§āϰ āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāϰā§āĻāĻāĻž āĻ āĻāĻŋāĻŽāĻžāύ āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āĻļā§āώ āĻāϰ⧠āĻĻāĻŋāĻ āύāĻžāĨ¤ āĻŦāĻžāĻŦāĻž-āĻŽāĻžāϝāĻŧā§āϰ āĻĒāϰ⧠āĻāĻ āĻŽāĻžāύā§āώāĻā§āϞā§āĻ āϤ⧠āϤā§āĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻļā§āĻļāĻŦā§āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻā§āϝāĻŧā§ āĻŦāĻĄāĻŧ āϏāĻžāĻā§āώā§āĨ¤ āĻā§āĻŦāύ āĻāĻāĻĻāĻŋāύ āĻļā§āώ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§ āϝāĻžāĻŦā§, āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāϤā§āϤāĻŋ, āĻ āĻšāĻāĻāĻžāϰ,
- Sep 27, 20262.6x their median
āϤāĻŦā§ āĻāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻāϰ āĻā§āύ⧠āĻāĻĢāϏā§āϏ āύā§āĻāĨ¤ āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āϝāĻžāĻā§ āĻāĻžāϞā§āĻŦā§āϏā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āϤāĻžāĻā§ āϏāϰā§āĻŦā§āĻā§āĻāĻāĻž āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āĻāĻžāϞā§āĻŦā§āϏā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽāĨ¤ āϏ⧠āĻāĻŋāϞ āĻāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻāĻžāϞā§āĻŦāĻžāϏāĻž, āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻ āύā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋāĨ¤āϤāĻžāϰ āĻāύā§āϝāĻ feel āĻāϰāϤ⧠āĻĒā§āϰā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ teenage-āĻāϰ āϏā§āĻ sweet feelingsāĨ¤āϤāĻžāϰ āĻĒā§āϰā§āĻŽā§ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧā§ āϝ⧠āϏā§āύā§āĻĻāϰ āĻ āύā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋāϰ āĻāύā§āĻŽ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§āĻāĻŋāϞ, āϏ⧠āĻŦā§āĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§āĻāĻŋāϞ āĻā§āύ āĻāĻžāϞā§āĻŦāĻžāϏāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻž āĻāĻāĻŋāϤ
- Sep 27, 20262.5x their median
"āύāĻŋāĻā§'āĻā§ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāύā§āϤā§āϰāĻŖ āĻāϰāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻž āĻāϞā§āϞāĻžāĻšāϰ āĻĒāĻā§āώ āĻĨā§āĻā§ āĻ āύā§āĻ āĻŦāĻĄāĻŧ āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻžāĻŽāϤ.!đ¤
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 639 times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.481% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 267x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chandniraat, #moonlight, #āĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāĻžāĻļāĻŋāϤāĻ āύā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋ.
- What is đģđĢ( āĻā§āύā§āĻĄā§ āĻŽā§āϝāĻŧā§ )đĢđģ's engagement rate on X?
- đģđĢ( āĻā§āύā§āĻĄā§ āĻŽā§āϝāĻŧā§ )đĢđģ (@Boby06981247) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,797 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.01%, đģđĢ( āĻā§āύā§āĻĄā§ āĻŽā§āϝāĻŧā§ )đĢđģ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Boby06981247 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Boby06981247 post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.