Back to @BobEUnlimited's profile

Bob Elliott engagement report

@BobEUnlimited - 305K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 305K followers
Per impression
0.461%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
79
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.461% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #beadata.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bob Elliott's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, Bob Elliott sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video66% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link34% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 220 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 12, 202413x their median

    Given the nature of this platform, it is hard to know what kind of track record folks have in making major macro calls. Here's a look at my track record over the last few years. Thread.

    848838720950K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.5x their median

    Read the room gents. Markets are screaming policy errors left and right: * Warsh presser - long bonds down a couple points. * Bessent buyback efforts - gold up 4%.

    5734052672K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.8x their median

    Household's loss of real purchasing power. https://t.co/fHLpmzs5PT

    437166319K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20265.7x their median

    Dude, Where’s My AI-Driven Productivity? If AI is the most revolutionary technology in history as many predict and markets increasingly price in, it’s odd that 4yrs in developed world macro productivity data shows no change in previous trends. https://t.co/tbhRinaC5Q https://t.co/guNFJWgzqO

    31850611999K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20265.6x their median

    What if peak AI expectations are now behind us? https://t.co/igbdtifGB9

    3532852878K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.1x their median

    *TREASURY DEPT ANNOUNCES INCREASED SIZES OF LONG-END BUYBACKS Another reminder that you don't own enough gold in your portfolio. https://t.co/r1mcrR7WGt

    2453732726K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    $RVI charges investors 1.10% in fund expenses on 750mln AUM. An $8mln money grab when these kind of funds can easily be run at <$1mln in annual expenses. https://t.co/IMzm4x2Hjy

    30372415K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.5x their median

    Another downside inflation surprise today. All those folks itching to sell bonds at multi-decade highs in yields are gonna be disappointed when the inflationary spiral doesn't come. https://t.co/ocEv0Lx82X

    2142234330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.2x their median

    Sharply slowing Walmart sales reported yesterday adds to the many indications of consumer exhaustion we've been seeing more recently. https://t.co/IT3AcAO0BB

    1903232219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.2x their median

    Nice timing for macro funds to max out their bond short. https://t.co/907NcwaiKB

    2032218835K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#beadata

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.461% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Bob Elliott's engagement rate on X?
Bob Elliott (@BobEUnlimited) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 305,264 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, Bob Elliott sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BobEUnlimited have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BobEUnlimited post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going