Bob Elliott engagement report
@BobEUnlimited - 305K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.461% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #beadata.
Compared with accounts its own size
Bob Elliott's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.026%, Bob Elliott sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 66% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 34% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 220 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 12, 202413x their median
Given the nature of this platform, it is hard to know what kind of track record folks have in making major macro calls. Here's a look at my track record over the last few years. Thread.
- Aug 19, 20268.5x their median
Read the room gents. Markets are screaming policy errors left and right: * Warsh presser - long bonds down a couple points. * Bessent buyback efforts - gold up 4%.
- Aug 27, 20265.8x their median
Household's loss of real purchasing power. https://t.co/fHLpmzs5PT
- Jun 4, 20265.7x their median
Dude, Where’s My AI-Driven Productivity? If AI is the most revolutionary technology in history as many predict and markets increasingly price in, it’s odd that 4yrs in developed world macro productivity data shows no change in previous trends. https://t.co/tbhRinaC5Q https://t.co/guNFJWgzqO
- Sep 3, 20265.6x their median
What if peak AI expectations are now behind us? https://t.co/igbdtifGB9
- Aug 19, 20264.1x their median
*TREASURY DEPT ANNOUNCES INCREASED SIZES OF LONG-END BUYBACKS Another reminder that you don't own enough gold in your portfolio. https://t.co/r1mcrR7WGt
- Aug 27, 20264.0x their median
$RVI charges investors 1.10% in fund expenses on 750mln AUM. An $8mln money grab when these kind of funds can easily be run at <$1mln in annual expenses. https://t.co/IMzm4x2Hjy
- Aug 13, 20263.5x their median
Another downside inflation surprise today. All those folks itching to sell bonds at multi-decade highs in yields are gonna be disappointed when the inflationary spiral doesn't come. https://t.co/ocEv0Lx82X
- Aug 21, 20263.2x their median
Sharply slowing Walmart sales reported yesterday adds to the many indications of consumer exhaustion we've been seeing more recently. https://t.co/IT3AcAO0BB
- Aug 18, 20263.2x their median
Nice timing for macro funds to max out their bond short. https://t.co/907NcwaiKB
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.461% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
- What is Bob Elliott's engagement rate on X?
- Bob Elliott (@BobEUnlimited) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 305,264 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.026%, Bob Elliott sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BobEUnlimited have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BobEUnlimited post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.