Back to @Blue_Footy's profile

Vince™ engagement report

@Blue_Footy - 676K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.217%
of 676K followers
Per impression
3.14%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
6.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.47/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 676K followers, an engagement rate of 0.217%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 3.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vince™'s engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.217%, Vince™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video31% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 31% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 198 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202615x their median

    Cole Palmer vs Fulham (A) https://t.co/2svLIkINR8

    18K2.7K1798172.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20268.8x their median

    Fulham played 35 long balls against us tonight, the most by any Premier League team on Matchday 1. They wanted to finish us with those long balls, but thank God we had Lacroix. He did well dealing with those balls and 1v1s.

    12K7937715139K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20268.5x their median

    Marco Palestra and Emmanuel Emegha in training today. https://t.co/WliL1Neuyz

    12K54847993K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.3x their median

    The principles Alonso is trying to install in this team is very, very similar to what Enrique is doing at PSG.

    10K58511228174K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.1x their median

    This number 9 curse is fake. If you are good, you are good. Even Tammy Abraham broke it. Those who failed with it were not good enough. https://t.co/Ov4ulyQWmb

    9.6K62014017100K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20267.0x their median

    Gave this 3 week international trial a go but it needs binning off. Bored of the internationals now and three weeks off is ridiculous for players not involved, fan etc. Need to go back to the old two week format

    9.7K26923735485K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.6x their median

    BREAKING: Flo Balogun deal to Everton is off. The medical threw up an issue so Everton renegotiated the terms of the deal with Monaco and put in a deal sheet. But the player has subsequently had a change of heart and walked away

    8.4K570327353993K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.0x their median

    It's destiny that we are going to have a very successful season. I can feel it.

    8.1K5401752799K viewsView on X
  • May 4, 20263.1x their median

    I have said it before, I hope Tuchel doesn't call up Cole Palmer for the World Cup. I want a fit and angry Cole Palmer next season. Injuries have messed him up this season, and many people have forgotten what he's capable of.

    7.1K46220330236K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.7x their median

    Honest Ahanor's agent, Beppe Riso: 🗣 “When he signed for Chelsea, he hugged a friend of his and me and cried.” https://t.co/hFlN6QjBv2

    6.6K27916785K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 676K followers, an engagement rate of 0.217%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 3.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Vince™'s engagement rate on X?
Vince™ (@Blue_Footy) has an engagement rate of 0.217%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 676,418 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.217%, Vince™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Blue_Footy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Blue_Footy post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going