Back to @BlissBleach's profile

Bliss Beach engagement report

@BlissBleach - 325K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 325K followers
Per impression
0.337%
2.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 325K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.337% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 4516x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bliss Beach's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Bliss Beach sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 165 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20264516x their median

    FBI Director Kash Patel’s girlfriend has lost a defamation case against a right-wing influencer who suggested she was an undercover Israeli “honey-pot.”

    29K2.6K1591021.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262604x their median

    15 years for calling the woman a niggr and waving a Confederate flag ~ "The judge wanted to send a message, you can't call them niqqers and wave a flag"... fifteen years in prison. https://t.co/TwoBfXPAHf

    13K1.8K2.6K3701.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026987x their median

    Just wait until it’s considered “antisemitic” to own a firearm.. You think I’m joking…

    6.2K61312522168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026890x their median

    https://t.co/Q4naehfb31

    3.7K2.2K181168196K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026681x their median

    Tucker Carlson- “Is this country (Britain) better than it was in 1945?” Stooge politician- “Yes of course, the GDP is higher!” Tucker Carlson- “Why is the suicide rate higher now? https://t.co/UOSv8BrM0w

    4.3K385771285K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026284x their median

    On December 14, 2006 David Duke appeared on CNN to debate former AIPAC lobbyist Wolf Blitzer. Their main topic of discussion was the Holocaust conference Duke had just attended in Iran. Blitzer cut the interview short by saying they had to, the "satellite was about to go down" https://t.co/U5F70ytTgG

    1.6K331442154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026240x their median

    🇨🇳This is Jinan, a second-tier city in China. Proof that socialism works better. https://t.co/bP2E7Kr35G

    7541316381561.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026235x their median

    “Why don’t people want to live around us” https://t.co/I0x8Cn3llS

    1.4K1421261184K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2013200x their median

    "Alcohol is just water with feelings in it," said the girl that failed chemistry class.

    752590532View on X
  • Oct 4, 202660x their median

    Donald Trump has caused 1/4 the total national debt.

    3443139528K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 325K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.337% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 4516x its own typical post.

What is Bliss Beach's engagement rate on X?
Bliss Beach (@BlissBleach) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 324,775 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Bliss Beach sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BlissBleach have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BlissBleach post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going