Back to @BjornLomborg's profile

Bjorn Lomborg engagement report

@BjornLomborg - 269K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.285%
of 269K followers
Per impression
4.28%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
6.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
765
interactions (median)
Saved
0.207%
37 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.23/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 765 interactions against 269K followers, an engagement rate of 0.285%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.7K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #restud.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bjorn Lomborg's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.285%, Bjorn Lomborg sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video61% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link92% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 61% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 92% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 308 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20266.2x their median

    The Great Barrier Reef's “obituary” was written again and again. But the patient didn’t comply: the five best years in the monitoring record are the five most recent. The reason you may not have heard this: alarming predictions are prominently reported, but rarely revisited when catastrophe fails to arrive. https://t.co/Mf2iJAfKPl

    3.6K1.0K394796K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.3x their median

    Expensive German climate policy: Germany now faces “structural decline” and is in “free fall”, with price increases “across the economy” Now, real German electricity price 222% of price in 2000 (households+industry) References at end of thread

    1.8K604556044K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.1x their median

    Last year, headlines declared the Great Barrier Reef “devastated” after its worst coral decline on record. What they rarely mentioned: the decline came from record highs, and 2025 was still the fourth-best year in four decades. Now coral is growing again. https://t.co/Mf2iJAfKPl

    1.8K504283424K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.0x their median

    Compelling: The West’s net-zero policies are handing China a huge strategic advantage While Western nations close reliable energy and raise costs, China adds wind and solar without giving up coal, oil or gas—then sells us the panels, batteries and other products our mandates require China’s approach is “add, don’t subtract”: build renewables and nuclear power while continuing to expand fossil fuels. This supplies cheap, dependable energy for Chinese industry. Meanwhile, many Western governments deliberately make their own energy more expensive and become increasingly dependent on Chinese solar panels, batteries, critical minerals and manufacturing. Western climate organizations scrutinize democracies far more aggressively than China, where independent activism is impossible and access depends on the state. Climate policy should be judged by its actual effect on global emissions, energy prices, industrial competitiveness and dependence on China—not simply by whether it appears ambitious at home. https://t.co/2gpXeNvrT9

    1.6K533694845K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.9x their median

    The most ridiculously climate-alarmist headline? "Canada is on fire, underwater and overheating" Reality: 1) Canada fire is below average 2) Canada has lost 0.002% of land over past 30 yrs 3) Warming saved many more Canadians from cold deaths than added deaths from heat Refs: 1) https://t.co/J7DeHOr46z 2) https://t.co/I4lfHtabQW 3) https://t.co/ho7zYDCNUC https://t.co/7r38X2EWsH

    1.7K424462792K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    The Great Barrier Reef is doing better than you have heard For years, alarming predictions about the Great Barrier Reef have generated headlines around the world. Good news receives rather less attention. New data show that the past five years have seen some of the highest coral cover in the monitoring record. From my latest newsletter: https://t.co/jfPBnKNY7b Sign up: https://t.co/PIif2dDeWJ

    1.3K384222730K viewsView on X
  • Dec 2, 20232.3x their median

    Yeah! Best Things First just named one of 2023 Best Books How do most good in world: For $35bn/yr save 4.2 million lives & make the poorer world $1.1 trillion richer—every year! Maybe a Christmas present? Audiobook, paperback, kindle, and hardback https://t.co/VbgsMQ7am5 https://t.co/MEmYTKqGP2

    1.3K30010838389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.1x their median

    The Guardian is shocked, shocked that Europeans would rather stay cool cheaply in a heatwave than spend a fortune waiting a century for climate policy to do little https://t.co/7q81xkV93Q

    1.4K19315818K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.0x their median

    A major environmental problem, droughts, is actually decreasing. Read my peer-reviewed article: https://t.co/CC0h7JKIKv https://t.co/7kZxJoVLgN

    1.1K348222636K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.9x their median

    Good to see Germany’s highest-circulation newspaper, BILD, covering the data: despite the dramatic headlines, the world is burning less, not more. Facts matter. And smarter forest management protects people far more effectively than costly climate policy. https://t.co/29IvINz09w

    1.2K251101022K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#restud

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 765 interactions against 269K followers, an engagement rate of 0.285%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.7K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

What is Bjorn Lomborg's engagement rate on X?
Bjorn Lomborg (@BjornLomborg) has an engagement rate of 0.285%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 269,420 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.285%, Bjorn Lomborg sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BjornLomborg have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BjornLomborg post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going