Bittopia engagement report
@Bittopia_ - 272K followers on X
Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 55 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 4.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.442% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 178 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #dexponent.
Compared with accounts its own size
Bittopia's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.02%, Bittopia sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 33% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1240 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 20263.2x their median
GN Mates USDe Is Testing a New Yield Engine Beyond Crypto 🧭 Ethena’s next move is less about “adding stocks” and more about reducing dependence on one yield regime. The protocol plans to extend USDe’s delta-neutral backing strategy into equity perpetual futures. That market has grown to roughly $6B+ in open interest, while reported funding rates on major venues have recently sat well above Bitcoin’s low-single-digit 2026 funding environment. The strategic point is diversification. If USDe can source basis yield from crypto, equities and other real-world-asset perpetuals, its revenue engine becomes less dependent on crypto leverage being expensive at exactly the right time. But the rollout is still early. Ethena has said the first exchange partners and deployments are expected over the coming weeks, and no meaningful current equity allocation has been disclosed yet. That makes execution, counterparty selection and risk controls more important than the headline yield. Disclaimer: Informational market analysis only. This is not financial or investment advice; derivative-backed strategies carry market, liquidity and counterparty risk. ethereum:0x57e114b691db790c35207b2e685d4a43181e6061 ethereum:0x4c9edd5852cd905f086c759e8383e09bff1e68b3 @EthenaFndtn @cryip_co #Ethena #DeFi #Stablecoins #RWA
- Sep 11, 20262.8x their median
GM Everyone PUMPLYX Is Still on Testnet and That Detail Matters One of the easiest mistakes in early Web3 products is treating a working interface as proof that the production economy is already live. PUMPLYX’s current wallet, Chrome extension and game listings explicitly identify the network environment as opBNB Testnet. The Chrome Web Store goes further and states that testnet assets have no real monetary value. That is not a weakness. Testnet is where systems are supposed to be tested. What matters is keeping the boundary clear: 🧪 Test activity is not automatically mainnet activity 💰 Test assets should not be treated like transferable market value 🔗 Network names and chain IDs should be verified before signing 📅 Mainnet, TGE and distribution rights should come from official announcements A serious community should be able to distinguish “product is usable” from “economic value is live.” 🌐 Website: https://t.co/N5qvbgwsrW 📢 Telegram: https://t.co/z5MppNJjq7 𝕏 X: https://t.co/kokfTKgYjP Disclaimer: Educational only. Testnet assets and activity may have no monetary value, and future mainnet, TGE or allocation terms can change. $PLYX binancecoin:native @PumplyxOfficial #PUMPLYX #opBNB #Testnet #Web3Security
- Sep 12, 20262.8x their median
GM Buddies Bitcoin’s Political Risk May Be Separating From Crypto’s Political Risk One of the more interesting U.S. policy arguments this week came from VanEck’s Matthew Sigel: Bitcoin may be less dependent on which political party controls Washington than the wider crypto market. That is a meaningful distinction. Under this thesis, BTC’s core investment case rests on scarcity, decentralization and monetary credibility. Other digital assets can be more exposed to questions around securities classification, issuer activity, exchange rules and token-specific regulation. Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act has been pushed into September, showing that legislative timing can remain partisan even while parts of crypto policy become more bipartisan. So instead of asking: “Which party is bullish for Bitcoin?” A better framework may be: • What rules affect access? • What rules affect custody? • What rules affect market structure? • Which assets depend on an issuer or regulatory classification? Bitcoin can still react to elections, fiscal policy and regulatory appointments. But if BTC increasingly trades as a macro scarce asset, its political sensitivity may look very different from the rest of crypto. 🏛₿ Disclaimer: Political and market commentary only. The views discussed are not predictions of election outcomes, regulatory decisions or Bitcoin performance. bitcoin:native @matthew_sigel @vaneck_us @BitcoinMagazine #Bitcoin #CryptoPolicy #MarketStructure
- Sep 18, 20262.7x their median
GM Everyone The Game and the Wallet Should Not Have the Same Data Footprint PUMPLYX separates its game and wallet into different applications. The public Google Play disclosures suggest that separation also extends to data handling. The PLYX Wallet listing says it may collect device or other IDs. The Pumplyx Game listing says it may collect personal information plus device or other IDs, and notes that users can request data deletion. Both listings state that data is encrypted in transit and not shared with third parties. That difference is interesting because the two products perform different jobs. 🎮 A game may need player profiles, progression and account context. 🔐 A wallet should ideally minimize everything unrelated to authorization and asset management. This is where modular product design can matter. If the game needs richer user information, that does not automatically mean the wallet needs the same information. For a Web3 ecosystem, privacy architecture is not only about the blockchain. It is also about deciding which application should know what. 🌐 Website: https://t.co/N5qvbgvUCo 📢 Telegram: https://t.co/z5MppNILAz 𝕏 X: https://t.co/kokfTKgquh Disclaimer: Information based privacy commentary only. Store disclosures can change and do not replace independent review of application permissions, privacy policies and technical implementation. $PLYX @PumplyxOfficial #PUMPLYX #PrivacyByDesign #GameFi #WalletSecurity
- Sep 11, 20262.6x their median
GN X-Communities ANSEM’s Burn Is Becoming a Business Model, Not Just a Meme Narrative 🔥 $ANSEM’s latest rally is easy to reduce to “token burn + whales.” The more interesting change is structural. https://t.co/AUWMW2fYjC now makes burning part of product access: Gold launches require 25,000 ANSEM burned, while Diamond launches require 100,000. Those burns are permanent, and qualifying launches can reserve community allocation for ANSEM holders. Recent protocol reporting puts cumulative burns above 2.43M ANSEM. My read: this can create a flywheel only if launch quality holds: more launches → more required burns → lower liquid supply → more holder attention → stronger launch distribution. The weak link is obvious. Scarcity cannot compensate for weak projects forever. Launch quality, repeat usage and genuine demand matter more than the burn headline itself. Disclaimer: Informational analysis only, not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; verify current data and do your own research. $ANSEM $SOL @blknoiz06 @BlackBullSol #ANSEM #Solana #Tokenomics
- Sep 7, 20262.4x their median
GM Everyone Bitcoin Startup Funding Is Becoming a Media Product 🎬 What if a Bitcoin accelerator, an investment committee and a reality show shared the same room? That is essentially the Cypher Tank model returning to Lugano for a second season. Last year’s debut drew 4,000+ participants from 64 countries. The 2026 format expands the finalist pool to 12 projects: 8 for-profit 4 nonprofit Founders will negotiate with investors in a “honey badger” judging format, while the process is filmed for an online series. The interesting part is not the entertainment layer. It is the distribution layer. Early-stage Bitcoin founders normally pitch behind closed doors. Turning the investment process into public media gives teams something capital alone cannot provide: narrative distribution, user discovery and reputational proof. The program also combines potential direct investment with three $100K service prizes focused on incubation, acceleration or relocation support. Finals are scheduled for October 25–27 in Lugano, with the recorded season expected online afterward. If this model works, Bitcoin startup competitions may stop being one-day events and start becoming recurring content engines for the builders themselves. 🦡⚡️ Disclaimer: Event and startup information only. Participation, prizes, investments, dates and program terms are subject to organizer rules and may change. bitcoin:native @cypher_tank @LuganoPlanB @BitcoinMagazine #Bitcoin #Startups #Lugano
- Sep 12, 20262.3x their median
Good Night An NFT Marketplace Is Only Useful If Players Can Read the Market PUMPLYX says its ecosystem includes an open marketplace for NFT assets. The interesting part is what should sit around that marketplace. A useful in game market needs more than a buy button. Players should be able to evaluate: 🔎 asset history 🧬 character attributes 📦 resource relevance 📈 transaction activity 💧 actual liquidity 💸 fees and settlement conditions PUMPLYX also says users can access transaction history, ecosystem metrics and analysis tools. If those layers connect properly, the marketplace can become part of strategy rather than a separate speculation screen. That distinction matters. A marketplace should help users price utility, provenance and scarcity with better information. It should not require them to guess what is happening behind the interface. 🌐 Website: https://t.co/N5qvbgvUCo 📢 Telegram: https://t.co/z5MppNILAz 𝕏 X: https://t.co/kokfTKgquh Disclaimer: Marketplace analysis only. NFT liquidity, pricing, metadata, fees, transferability and utility may change and should be independently verified. $PLYX @PumplyxOfficial #PUMPLYX #NFTMarketplace #GameFi #OnchainEconomy
- Sep 10, 20262.3x their median
GM Mates Chikungunya Is Becoming a Mobility + Mosquito Economics Story 🦟 Chikungunya is no longer a story that fits neatly inside “tropical disease” borders. ECDC reported 219,522 cases and 81 deaths across 25 countries in 2026 as of early August, excluding EU/EEA countries and territories. Twelve countries had ongoing outbreaks, and the Philippines reported cases for the first time in 2026. The underpriced risk is not mortality alone. Chikungunya can produce prolonged joint pain, meaning lost workdays, medical costs and pressure on tourism-dependent regions during mosquito season. 📍 Resilience is local: remove standing water, use effective repellent, wear covering clothing, use screens/nets, and check destination-specific health advice before travel. Cities also need vector surveillance before hospitals see the curve. Climate suitability + global travel + established Aedes mosquitoes can turn a local outbreak into a regional productivity problem. The mosquito is tiny. The balance-sheet effect can be much larger. Disclaimer: For public-health awareness only. Case counts change as surveillance data are updated. @ECDC_EU @WHO @pahowho #Chikungunya #MosquitoBorne #ClimateHealth #TravelHealth #PublicHealth
- Sep 16, 20262.3x their median
GM Buddies The BNB → opBNB Bridge Is a UX Shortcut, Not a Risk Eraser PLYX Wallet added a BNB → opBNB bridge in its recent iOS update cycle. That is a meaningful usability improvement. If the PUMPLYX ecosystem operates on opBNB, giving users an in-wallet path from BNB reduces the number of external steps needed before they can interact with the ecosystem. But a bridge should never be treated like a cosmetic button. The user is still moving value between network environments. That means the important checks remain: 🌉 Which network is the asset leaving? 🔗 Which network will receive it? 💸 What fees apply? ⏱️ How long should settlement take? ✍️ What exactly is being authorized before confirmation? The best bridge UX makes those details easier to understand instead of hiding them. For PUMPLYX, the interesting benchmark is whether moving from BNB into the opBNB environment becomes simple without making users careless. Good infrastructure removes unnecessary friction. It should not remove necessary attention. 🌐 Website: https://t.co/N5qvbgwsrW 📢 Telegram: https://t.co/z5MppNJjq7 𝕏 X: https://t.co/kokfTKgYjP Disclaimer: Technical commentary only. Bridging assets can involve smart contract, network, routing and user error risks; always verify network and transaction details before signing. $PLYX binancecoin:native @PumplyxOfficial @BNBCHAIN #PUMPLYX #opBNB #BNBChain #Web3UX
- Sep 13, 20262.2x their median
GN FAMs Pumplyx Makes a Strong Distribution Claim. Here Is What Should Be Verified Next. Pumplyx says it did not conduct private funding rounds, hidden token sales or private presales, and says it did not reserve a significant portion of supply for funds or early investors. That is a meaningful claim because launch structure can shape who controls an ecosystem before the public ever arrives. But a claim is not the end of due diligence. When final token information is published, I would look for: 📄 complete supply and allocation tables ⏳ vesting and unlock schedules 🏦 treasury and ecosystem wallet disclosure 🔗 deployer and contract verification 📊 concentration after distribution The right standard is not “trust the launch narrative.” It is “can the launch narrative be checked onchain and against published tokenomics?” That is where transparency becomes measurable. 🌐 Website: https://t.co/N5qvbgvUCo 📢 Telegram: https://t.co/z5MppNILAz 𝕏 X: https://t.co/kokfTKgquh Disclaimer: Research commentary only. The funding and allocation statements above reflect Pumplyx’s published claims and should be independently verified against final tokenomics and onchain data. $PLYX @PumplyxOfficial #PUMPLYX #Tokenomics #CryptoResearch #DYOR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 55 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 4.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.442% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 178 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.
- What is Bittopia's engagement rate on X?
- Bittopia (@Bittopia_) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 70 original posts from the last 30 days against 271,685 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.02%, Bittopia sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Bittopia_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Bittopia_ post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.8 posts per day across the measured window.