BIG BOOBS & ASS engagement report
@BigTitsLoves - 1.6M followers on X
Measured over 248 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.137%. Measured over 248 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 3.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 14.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 248 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80K interactions, about 38x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aicompanion, #secretsai, #nsfw.
Measured over 248 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #aicompanion, #secretsai, #nsfw.
Compared with accounts its own size
BIG BOOBS & ASS's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.137%, BIG BOOBS & ASS sits above the 50th percentile of the 155,901 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 55 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 3, 202638x their median
When She Meets A Guy With A Girlfriend 😅 https://t.co/X3T5H3X0eN
- Sep 21, 202623x their median
Riding His Soul Out 🥵 https://t.co/YA1K7kw5bj
- Sep 23, 202623x their median
Body Of A Goddess 😵💫 https://t.co/lfxqD2TyUQ
- Sep 5, 202615x their median
What A MILF Daym 🥵 https://t.co/SMC0hJJ8LQ
- Sep 8, 202615x their median
😵💫 https://t.co/d8EMJNyaGB
- Sep 24, 20267.7x their median
How’s The View? @HaileyRoseFucks https://t.co/nhX2CYUvn2
- Sep 20, 20267.6x their median
https://t.co/PaLiCZAxmJ
- Sep 5, 20266.0x their median
Size Doesn't Matter, Hope He Survived 🥵 https://t.co/EAWdIUdoj3
- Aug 31, 20265.4x their median
https://t.co/mG8t6GkKmT
- Sep 5, 20265.0x their median
The First Pair of Tits I Ever Saw https://t.co/CQnhr5lc23
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.137%. Measured over 248 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 3.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 14.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 248 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80K interactions, about 38x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aicompanion, #secretsai, #nsfw.
- What is BIG BOOBS & ASS's engagement rate on X?
- BIG BOOBS & ASS (@BigTitsLoves) has an engagement rate of 0.137%, based on the median interactions across 248 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,553,819 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.137%, BIG BOOBS & ASS sits above the 50th percentile of the 155,901 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BigTitsLoves have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BigTitsLoves post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 14.73 posts per day across the measured window.