Beverley Eve engagement report
@BevEve - 41K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on November 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 41K followers, an engagement rate of 0.075%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 24,309 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 2.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 87x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gartnerit, #cybersecurityawarenessmonth, #goodtimes.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on November 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #gartnerit, #cybersecurityawarenessmonth, #goodtimes.
Compared with accounts its own size
Beverley Eve's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,309 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.075%, Beverley Eve sits above the 25th percentile of the 243,810 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.027% to 0.158%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.027% |
| 50th percentile | 0.158% |
| 75th percentile | 0.744% |
| 90th percentile | 2.77% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 20% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 294 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 28, 202687x their median
When networks get crowded, first responders still need to communicate. At IACP 2026, we showed how T-Priority delivers top data priority on every 5G band, alongside T-Satellite's coverage extension and our 24/7 Emergency Response Team. Connectivity built around public safety needs. https://t.co/HcmBnPVpnD
- Oct 26, 2026
Humanoid robots grab headlines, but Physical AI is much bigger. At Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo 2026, Jeff Frantz explored what CIOs need to consider to make intelligent systems work together. 4 decisions: Connect. Secure. Place. Orchestrate. @TMobileBusiness Partner | #GartnerIT https://t.co/1BwozG1Eib
- Oct 22, 2026
One factory. Dozens of connected systems. Do they all need separate networks? At Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo 2026, I caught up with Ryan Bowman to see how @TMobileBusiness uses hybrid 5G and Edge Control to simplify manufacturing connectivity👇 T-Mobile for Business Partner | #GartnerIT
- Oct 20, 2026
Now THIS is innovation with heart 🩷 @GaryVee’s pick at the T-Mobile for Business Innovate Awards: Edwards Life Sciences, using connected heart monitoring to support earlier intervention. Customer-reported results show a 73% reduction in heart failure hospitalisations. Remarkable! Honoured to be around people making such a difference to so many. @TMobileBusiness Partner | Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo 2026 #GartnerIT #InnovateAwards
- Oct 21, 2026
📡 What does a future-ready network actually look like? At #GartnerIT, Shawn Settar from @TMobileBusiness explained how AI is helping networks move beyond reacting to problems, towards anticipating them. And some of the real-world examples were fascinating. 👇 @TMobileBusiness Partner | Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo 2026
- Oct 20, 2026
Celebrating innovation with a side of good food, great company and plenty of laughs! 🏆 A brilliant evening at the T-Mobile for Business Innovate Awards, celebrating the people putting technology to work in extraordinary ways 👏 Always extra fun hanging out with my co-founder @Chels_LA 🩷 Thank you @TMobileBusiness for having us! T-Mobile for Business Partner | Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo 2026 #GartnerIT #InnovateAwards
- Oct 21, 2026
‘In life, it’s not where you go… it’s who you travel with’ - Charles M. Schulz @Chels_LA @EvanKirstel @Ronald_vanLoon #GoodTimes #GartnerIT @Gartner_inc https://t.co/S9yGDiA4oe
- Oct 19, 2026
When you’re at Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo 2026 talking about connectivity powering innovation, even the golf buggies get in on the action! 🛺 👏 Travelling in SuperBroadband style to catch @garyvee! @TMobileBusiness Partner https://t.co/VigyCRdBc3
- Oct 14, 2026
Who owns cyber resilience at your place? 👀 If 3 people just pointed at each other, you're not alone. 98.4% say their security teams need to collaborate better. Could you prove you're ready to recover? New @IDC research for @Commvault 👉 https://t.co/WK0Sq3pjcj Commvault Partner https://t.co/Ngy0yBLvul
- Oct 12, 2026
RT @RobTiffany: The biggest news in tech over the last several days has been the use of AI and Rust to create clean-room reimplementations…
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 41K followers, an engagement rate of 0.075%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 24,309 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 2.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 87x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gartnerit, #cybersecurityawarenessmonth, #goodtimes.
- What is Beverley Eve's engagement rate on X?
- Beverley Eve (@BevEve) has an engagement rate of 0.075%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 40,670 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.075%, Beverley Eve sits above the 25th percentile of the 243,810 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BevEve have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,309 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BevEve post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.