Back to @Beth_Kindig's profile

Beth Kindig engagement report

@Beth_Kindig - 184K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.133%
of 184K followers
Per impression
0.818%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
16.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
245
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 245 interactions against 184K followers, an engagement rate of 0.133%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.818% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Beth Kindig's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.133%, Beth Kindig sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 17, 202311x their median

    Is there room for one more in the Old Boys' Club? Stanley Druckenmiller: 4.61% Ray Dalio: 6.91% Bill Ackman: 9.44% I/O Fund: 15.50% https://t.co/guSG4kSQ3G

    2.1K241201431.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.2x their median

    GPU rental prices are rising across every generation, with Nebius raising H100 prices by 17% and B300 prices by 21%. $NBIS $CRWV $NVDA https://t.co/2bVjrROZ5M https://t.co/8paRN1wj6V

    63294381755K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.5x their median

    CoreWeave $CRWV CEO Michael Intrator: “We are struggling to meet demand every day. Every GPU we have could be sold to multiple different clients.” $NVDA

    5464225243K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.5x their median

    OpenRouter’s monthly token traffic has risen from 2 trillion in January 2025 to 379 trillion as of July 2026, with open-weight models accounting for 75% of token generation. $NVDA $MSFT $META $GOOG $AMZN https://t.co/edzFs1TBaB

    48465391948K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.2x their median

    Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang previously called Palantir $PLTR Ontology “probably the single most important enterprise stack in the world today.” Now, the relationship between the two AI leaders is expanding, and it could open the door to a much bigger opportunity for Palantir. Read our latest analysis⬇️ https://t.co/Hv56tMvgVl

    46161161138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.0x their median

    Micron is reportedly accelerating its HBM expansion, with capacity expected to rise as much as 60K wafers per month to focus on 12-hi HBM4. This would take Micron’s total capacity to approximately 100K wafers per month, per TrendForce. $MU $NVDA $AMD $AVGO

    4433422337K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.0x their median

    In the race to ramp up, Nebius $NBIS and CoreWeave $CRWV have similar gross debt to annualized Q2 revenue, at 3.7x and 3.4x, respectively. The difference lies in how much liquidity each has to offset debt – Nebius has net debt of 0.2x annualized revenue, compared to CoreWeave’s 2.9x, giving it higher flexibility to build capacity. https://t.co/PzeUUk4VxG

    40240411169K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20261.9x their median

    Nvidia $NVDA says that its share of IT capex across the top 5 hyperscalers rose from 11% at the start of 2023 to 38% in Q2 2026, expecting this to rise to 44% by the end of 2027. $AVGO $AMD https://t.co/D1qmX4LCBu

    3794538330K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.8x their median

    Google Cloud $GOOG CEO Thomas Kurian: “We offer 2.7x better price performance for training, 80% better price performance for inference, 30% better price performance for CPUs.” $NVDA $AMD $AVGO

    3982813637K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.8x their median

    Nvidia, Broadcom, AMD and Micron are worth a combined $9.8 trillion, up from just $1.7 trillion three years ago. $NVDA $AVGO $AMD $MU https://t.co/yk4SiivtB1

    3693434629K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 245 interactions against 184K followers, an engagement rate of 0.133%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.818% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Beth Kindig's engagement rate on X?
Beth Kindig (@Beth_Kindig) has an engagement rate of 0.133%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 184,450 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.133%, Beth Kindig sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Beth_Kindig have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Beth_Kindig post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going