Beth Rigby engagement report
@BethRigby - 515K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 264 interactions against 515K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 0.539% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #electoraldysfunction, #royalparkshalf, #sundaymorningwith.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #electoraldysfunction, #royalparkshalf, #sundaymorningwith.
Compared with accounts its own size
Beth Rigby's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.051%, Beth Rigby sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 42% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 33% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 336 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 21, 202610x their median
BREAKING: Burnham to cut VAT from energy bills from October 1. The move is expected to take around £45 off the yearly Ofgem price cap. Will cost £850m & will be funded through the cancelled digital ID scheme. Burnham: “I said I wanted to give people breathing space, and that’s what I’m announcing on my second day as Prime Minister. “We’re taking immediate action to cut taxes on energy bills, put more money in people’s pockets and bring back hope.”
- Oct 9, 20267.2x their median
BREAKING: Labour's Sagal Abdi-Wali has officially been declared the winner of the Holborn and St Pancras by-election with 12,292 votes. Green Party leader Zack Polanski received 8,928 votes. Follow live updates ➡️ https://t.co/esLbmGQiLj https://t.co/nLB5JwIFGv
- Sep 4, 20266.9x their median
Farage not ten minutes into speech and already three instances of heckling where protesters dragged out of hall.
- Sep 4, 20266.4x their median
At press conference, Farage read a pre-prepared statement when asked about C4 probe & investigation, which is quite unusual for Farage. He also seemed quite flat as he fielded Qs. We’ve spoken to delegates today who are concerned about the allegations, one telling me it’s me it leaves a bad smell. More on @SkyNews later
- Aug 2, 20265.7x their median
Should men be banned from standing in the next Labour leadership contest? @HarrietHarman thinks it could be the only way to finally get a female leader. 🎧 Hear the full chat with @BethRigby on Electoral Dysfunction here 👉 https://t.co/eZx6Cllbdf https://t.co/6nZReGYfYS
- Jul 20, 20264.8x their median
So, where we are now, compiled by our great newsdesk Andy Burnham has finished for today appointing his cabinet. He made 27 appointments: 1. John Healey - Chancellor 2. Ed Miliband - Foreign Sec 3. Shabana Mahmood - Home Sec 4. Wes Streeting - Defence Sec 5. Alex Norris - Justice Sec 6. Yvette Cooper - Health Sec 7. Pat McFadden - Work & Pensions Sec 8. Louise Haigh - CDL + First Secretary of State 9. Lucy Powell - Education Sec 10. Miatta Fahnbulleh - Energy Sec 11. Angela Rayner - Housing Sec 12. Jonathan Reynolds - Business Sec 13. Heidi Alexander - Transport Sec 14. Angela Eagle - Environment Sec 15. Lisa Nandy - Culture Sec 16. Chris Bryant - Northern Ireland Sec 17. Douglas Alexander - Scotland Sec 18. Stephen Kinnock - Wales Sec 19. Anneliese Midgley - Chief Whip 20. Baroness Smith - Lords Leader 21. Alan Campbell - Commons Leader 22. Bridget Phillipson - Equalities Minister 23. Emma Reynolds - Chief Sec to the Treasury 24. Ellie Reeves - Attorney General 25. Kanishka Narayan - AI Minister 26. Hamish Falconer - Intergovernmental Relations Minister 27. Matt Pennycook - Housing Minister 15 new additions to the cabinet. 12 members of Starmer's cabinet were kept on, with 7 staying in the same post, and 5 getting new jobs. 3 new positions that will attend cabinet (AI minister, Intergovernmental Relations Minister and Housing Minister) 11 members of Starmer's cabinet are confirmed to have left their government (All were officially confirmed by No10 except for Jenny Chapman, who tweeted herself) Phone calls: 1. Donald Trump 2. Volodymyr Zelenskyy 3. Ursula von der Leyen 4. Emmanuel Macron 5. Mark Rutte 6. Friedrich Merz 7. Antonio Costa
- Jul 20, 20264.2x their median
Google: photos where everyone is serving The top result: https://t.co/h87Qwv56XT
- Oct 14, 20263.6x their median
The Conservatives seem to be enjoying a conference bounce as they jump to second in our voting intention, while Labour lead by 4. 🌹 LAB 28% (-1) 🌳 CON 24% (+3) ⏩ REF 21% (-3) 🔶 LIB DEM 11% (+1) 🟢 GREEN 7% (-) ⚫ RES: 5% (+1) N = 2,101 | Fieldwork 9-12/10 | Changes w 5/10 https://t.co/eTofavrjWD
- Oct 12, 20263.3x their median
Esther McVey asks the PM if he will honour the referendum. He says he does and he will, but he then says on exploring future options: "I am determined to do better for Britain" and says if McVey wants to maintain the status quo on Europe, "she is in the minority"
- Sep 9, 20262.8x their median
BREAKING: Met Police to investigate Reform UK over donations which may have broken electoral law. Reform UK deny these allegations broadcast by Channel 4 News. Political correspondent @AliFortescue has the latest from the Met. https://t.co/EMTnnRmZ87 https://t.co/xmRq8XaHVL
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 264 interactions against 515K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 0.539% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #electoraldysfunction, #royalparkshalf, #sundaymorningwith.
- What is Beth Rigby's engagement rate on X?
- Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 514,764 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.051%, Beth Rigby sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BethRigby have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BethRigby post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.